Russian military doctrine to identify Nato, not Terrorism, as main threat

Adding on to no longer tolerating dissent, beating up protestors, and murdering journalists and exiles who knew and said too much, Russia now takes yet another step back to the Cold War era.

The writers of the Simpsons predicted this many years ago… proving they have a better grasp of international relations than most western government

Russia is to replace its military doctrine with a more hawkish version that boldly identifies Nato and the west as its greatest danger.
In a statement posted on its website, Russia’s powerful security council said it no longer considered global terrorism as its biggest danger. Instead, Russia was developing a new national security strategy which reflected changing “geo-political” realities, and the fact that rival military alliances were becoming “stronger” - “especially Nato”.

“There have been changes in the character of the threat to the military security of Russia. More and more leading world states are seeking to upgrade their national armed forces. The configuration has changed,” the council said.
Although President Vladimir Putin ordered his generals to revise the country’s military doctrine in June 2005, the blueprint reflects the sudden deterioration in relations with the west.

In particular Russia has been incensed by the US administration’s plans to site two new missile interceptor and radar bases in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Senior figures in the Russian military yesterday told the Guardian they were infuriated by what they regard as Nato’s “relentless expansion” into “post-Soviet space” - the countries of former communist eastern Europe and the Baltic. Russia felt increasingly “encircled” by hostile neighbours, they said.

Yesterday Russia’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, said Washington had failed to explain why it wanted to site missile bases on Russia’s doorstep. President Putin has ridiculed the US claim that the bases are designed to shoot down rogue missiles from Iran or North Korea, claiming their real target is Russia’s nuclear arsenal.

“We have been discussing this issue with our American colleagues. But most of our questions have remained without coherent answers,” Mr Lavrov said.

It is not clear when Russia’s new doctrine will be in place. But the council is likely to recommend a new strategy by the end of the year, military sources said. The doctrine follows a big increase in military expenditure announced last month.

Yesterday analysts said the new doctrine would be “much tougher” than the old one, adopted in 2000.

“It will be much harsher towards the US and Nato. The doctrine will reflect Russia’s concerns about Nato enlargement and the ABM [anti-ballistic missile] system deployment close to Russia’s borders,” Sergei Kortunov, a former member of the council, and professor at Moscow’s school of economics, said. He added: “Russia is concerned about the US’s creation of new arms systems. It is also worried about the dangers to Russia from the US and other western countries, and their political role in the countries of the post-Soviet space.”

The chairman of Russia’s academy of military science, Mahmoud Garayev, said Russia could no longer afford to ignore the threat from Nato. Drugs and terrorism were an irrelevance, he said.

The doctrine comes as the Bush administration has reportedly decided to step up its arguably erratic bilateral engagement with Moscow.

According to the New York Times, the White House intends to “reach out more often and more intensively” to Russia, an acknowledgment in effect that it has not always consulted Russia on major foreign policy and national security plans.

Re: Russian military doctrine to identify Nato, not Terrorism, as main threat

told ya time and time again, even back when the whole thing collapsed..glasnost and prestroika and all that jazz that Russia is not about give up its visions of grandeur..and while its on its knees and acting like its shaping up, its no friend.

i dont trust the russians one bit.

Re: Russian military doctrine to identify Nato, not Terrorism, as main threat

Disintegration of USSR did not change much, Russia still has the capability to wipe out amreeka from the face of the earth. During the turmoil it heavily relied on nuclear punch (more bang for the buck) since its economy is picking up it will upgrade its conventional military machine and will be back to square one.... The first post-Soviet innovation in nuclear policy is the first use of nuclear weapons.. Amreeka you better watch out, Russia has lots and lots of oil perhaps amreeka should buy from the Russkies and pay $500 a barrel without making a pigs squeak..

Russian Foreign Policy Hints at a New Cold War

by Gregory Feifer

All Things Considered, March 5, 2007 · During the Cold War, military parades on Red Square were part of a massive show of force. The practice stopped during the 1990s, but now it has been revived.

Last May, Russian President Vladimir Putin led an elaborate ceremony marking the country's victory in World War II and showcasing Moscow's new wealth.

Russia is back. Fifteen years after the collapse of what Washington used to call the "evil empire," the rhetoric from Moscow is once again confrontational, and often directed against the West.

Some observers have warned of a new Cold War and say the United States and Europe need to reassess their attitudes toward Russia.

But Russia is plotting a different course than the Soviet Union, which projected power through military might and communist ideology.

Today, Russia's ill-disciplined military is a far cry from the Red Army. Independent legislator Vladimir Ryzhkov says profit, not ideology, drives Moscow's relations with other countries.

"Oil and gas generate 70 percent of the country's income," Ryzhkov says. "That means the interests of the state Gazprom natural gas monopoly are often inextricably linked to foreign policy."

The boom is changing the face of Moscow by driving the construction of imposing new office buildings. Sales from Russia's vast reserves of oil and gas are powering the economy to levels not seen since its dramatic post-communist collapse.

But business success is also changing foreign policy. Officials have made no secret of their belief that Russia's economic recovery entitles it to flex political muscle in the international arena.

Russia recently hiked gas prices for its former Soviet neighbors and cut energy supplies to Ukraine and Belarus in price disputes that disrupted deliveries to Western Europe. Moscow also recently forced the Shell oil company to hand over the largest foreign investment project in Russia to Gazprom.

Western governments say Russia is using energy to bully its rivals. But the Kremlin's actions are popular back home.

New Kremlin-backed youth groups stage regular protests outside foreign embassies. Youth for Motherland organized a recent pro-government rally near the Foreign Ministry, housed in one of Moscow's iconic Stalin-era skyscrapers.

Member Mikhail Boycko says he's proud of the growing power the ministry once again represents.

"If we continue on the same path, in 20 years, God willing, we'll be able to resurrect the might of our great predecessor, the Soviet Union," Boycko says.

In the corridors of power, anger at the West is growing. Officials are particularly offended by Western criticism of human rights violations, which is seen here as merely a political tool with which to pressure Russia.

Boris Nemtsov, a top pro-Western reformer in the 1990s, says that's because Putin and his allies think other countries are run just like Russia, and that in a powerful country such as the United States, the government must have control of the judicial system and the media.

"No independent court system, no opposition, no independence of press," Nemtsov says. "This is all a special cynical game against Russia. [Putin] believes in that."

The U.S. plans to install part of its controversial missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic — former Soviet Bloc countries that are now NATO members. The plans have further angered the Kremlin, and Moscow has warned that it may target any such sites in Eastern Europe with its own missiles.

Russia's new aggressiveness was also starkly evident in February at a defense and security conference in Munich. President Vladimir Putin lashed out against Washington, helping to plunge relations between the United States and Russia to their lowest level since the Cold War.

"One state's rule has overstepped its national borders in all areas, in economics, politics and the humanitarian sphere, and is trying to force itself on other states," Putin told the conference in a pointed jab at the United States. "Well, who would like that?"

Russian media headlines proclaimed the start of a new Cold War. But experts dismiss such rhetoric. Despite its revival, Russia's economy is still relatively small — it is the world's ninth largest, lagging behind Italy — for it to compete as an equal to most Western countries.

But Moscow's new clout does mean its cooperation is crucial not only on energy, but also on issues such as nuclear nonproliferation and anti-terrorism.

That kind of collaboration is increasingly rare. Sarah Mendelson of Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies says Moscow has reverted to Soviet-style obstructionism in international forums, such as the United Nations Security Council, where Russia has veto power.

"Time and time and time again, the Russians are voting with the Chinese on a variety of issues," Mendelson says. "They often have to do with human rights, and it's simply meant to put a spoke in the wheel as the international community is trying to do something about gross human-rights violations. And that is very much a legacy of the Soviet Union, and it's very disturbing."

Critics in Washington say Russia has opposed U.S.-led efforts to block the nuclear programs in North Korea and Iran. Moscow is building a nuclear power plant in Iran and also recently sold Tehran a billion dollars' worth of tactical missiles, much to Washington's annoyance.

Western leaders say Putin's recent harsh criticism of the West was a wake-up call about the country's direction in foreign policy. But many analysts say it's time the United States and its European allies develop a common approach to Moscow if they want to deal effectively with the new gauntlet the Kremlin has thrown on the world stage.

Re: Russian military doctrine to identify Nato, not Terrorism, as main threat

challo yaar with russia up again and the cold war starting the boogeyman will be the russkies and not the moozlims .... no more bad guys named ahmed on TV shows and back to Sergei and Hans and shyt like that.

cold war rocks

Re: Russian military doctrine to identify Nato, not Terrorism, as main threat

acc to the predictions i've heard, commie china is gonna be the world's largest economy, beating US. second will be indya and third comes the US and fourth russia or brazil, can't remember.
So, it's not gonna be a cold war b/w US and russia.
And if indya and commie china fight with each other, behold, it will be the end of the world!( chinese missiles can cover half of the entire world already and indyan missiles will cover THE WHOLE world by 2020)

Re: Russian military doctrine to identify Nato, not Terrorism, as main threat

So, British and American media NOW concentrating over “freedom” in Russia!!!

ufff.. they do occasionally highlight lack of “democracy” in China (particularly after Chinese conduct some missile tests)..

I remember they said there was NO DEMOCRACY and ZERO TOLERANCE FOR OTHER RELIGIONS in Saudi Arabia (immediately after 9/11 when some hijackers happened to be Saudi nationals).
During 9/11 era, we also got information from them that Saudis export the cult of “Wahhabism” to other nations!

But now no such news?

(Not To Mention)…Saudi Monarchs(the self proclaimed custodian of Islamic holy shrines) are allies(puppets?) of Washington.

At the moment, apart from Russia, there are many more countries like Iran and Syria “severely” lacking in democracy and USA certified human liberty..

PS: If a country wants to get a good “audit” reports from western media, they should get certificates from Washington first.:confused: