Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it’s allies

You’re surely not a fan of him because you don’t know anything about him.

Thackeray is very vocal in his opposition to people who migrate to Mumbai, to non-Hindus (especially Muslims), and to Pakistanis. In the late 1970s, as part of his “Maharashtra is for Maharashtrians” campaign, Thackeray threatened migrants from South India with harm unless they left Mumbai.

In 2002, Thackeray issued a call to form** Hindu suicide squads** to counter alleged Muslim violence:If such suicide squads are formed only then can we take on perpetrators of mindless violence.[8]](Bal Thackeray - Wikipedia)
In reaction to Thackeray’s call to form Hindu suicide squads against Muslims, Maharashtra government registered a case against him for inciting enmity between different groups. [9]](Bal Thackeray - Wikipedia)

Asia Times further reported on Thackeray’s rhetoric:Thackeray called on Hindus to form suicide squads “to take the Muslims head on”. “Trouble-making Muslims should be wiped out from the country … kick out the four crore [40 million] Bangladeshi Muslims and then the country will be secure,” the Shiv Sena leader said. Urging Hindus to start calling India “Hindu rashtra” (Hindu nation), he maintained that only “our religion [Hinduism] is to be honored here” and then “we will look after other religions”.[10]](Bal Thackeray - Wikipedia)
At least two organizations founded and managed by the retired Indian Army officers namely Lt Col (retired) Jayant Rao Chitale and Lt Ge. P.N. Hoon (former commander-in-chief of the Western Command), answered Bal Thackeray’s call to set up the Suicide Squads in India. Lt Gen. Hoon claimed, Thackeray instructed him to set up the training camps.[11]](Bal Thackeray - Wikipedia)
Thackeray continues to publish inflammatory editorials in his party’s newsletter, Samna (Confrontation).
From Wikipedia.

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

^^ ya but all he is doing is talking. Give me once incident where any suicide bombing took place.

And i agree with one part..kick out illegal immigrants..not beause they are muslims but they are illegaly in india and they make lot of trouble.There have been numerous incidents of robbery by these illegal immigrants.

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

Topic is Russia and you guys are deepa analyzing Bal Thackeray! :)

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

He didn't say "illegal" (you're saying it) and your earlier statement Bal thackrey doesnt send suicide bombers to kill people.
He doesnt ask his followers to kill muslims on the name of god has proven false. So stop covering this hindu terrorist.

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

Apparently some do:

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

Then I'm glad that I'm not one of them. People who use terms like Islamic Terrorism or Hindu Terrorism or Christian Terrorism or Jewish Terrorism are ignorants and stupid because no religion asks its followers to kill innocents and spread terrorism.

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it’s allies

What is Pakistan’s JF-17 picture doing in a news article “Russia can use nukes”? Or do you suggest they will deliver nuke using JF-17? :smiley:

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it’s allies

^:rotfl:

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

I feel guilty because I couldn't copy-paste this one.

US federal debt = $9.193 trillion (as of today)
US state and local debt = $2.05 trillion (at the end of first quarter of 2007)
US credit card debt = $2.17 trillion

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

with all due respect ali sahab, please pay attention. ther eis no generalization, I am specifically asking people who were getting into the filthy game of declaring each other non muslim to stop. i did not ask anyone else to stop anything.

if you are one fo them please stop.

if you are not one of them it does not pertain to you and does not pertain to anything else covered in this thread.

best regards

X2

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

^I replied on the cut and paste issue, rather than the issue declaring each other non muslims. But you are right on this.

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies


Unfortunately some followers misinterpret the teachings and they are the ones that are ignorants and stupids. But it is a fact that there are many who kill innocents and spread terrorism in the name of, and inspired by, their religion, God, prophets and texts.

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

So it is ok to rely on their misinterpretation and start naming their extreme actions as Islamic or Hindu or Christian or Jewish terrorism?

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

When someone says that they have killed in the name of a God, does the family of the victims stop and say "well....theoretically speaking....they are doing it on disinformation"

If you know of such a case, show me.

Moreover, this is being declared by a society that spent roughly 75% of the last century (Christian Calendar) waging war against each other in the name of Christianity. They developed secularism, which was enhanced by WW2 and the mass dead bodies of Jews.

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

Obl's son recently did.

Re: Russia would launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes to defend it's allies

If by extreme actions you refer to the violent methods, no it should not be so generalized, as long as such violence is not sanctioned or called for by the religion or its major proponents.

But I do think it would be a disservice not to deal with the current menace of jihadi suicide bombings. Granted no religion has been free of some outburst but the extent and frequency of such terror in recent times, since it is being done in the name of the Islamic religion, must be addressed by the Islamic leaders in their own and the interest of the rest of the world.