1953 is the darkest year in the history of pakistan. when the * ahrari * Molvis decided to kill off all ahmedis from the surface of the earth. Below are some extracts from the report of ** investigative court tribunal for the 1953 case against the ahmedis **, which was later decided in the favour of ahmedis. So it must be noted that these reports are from sunnis themselves!
" We are unable to use decent words for the behaviour of * ahrari * molvis. Their action was sinister, and hateful."
( page 277, 278 )
" The speeches of * ahrari *molvis against ahmedis are not only poisonous, but also sinister."
( quoting mr. anwar ali, DIG of CID, page 121 )
---------- ** False propaganda **
" Such a claim, as made by the molvis that the plane accident of lahore cantt, was planned by the ahmedis, is a clear lie! Because the people who died in the above mentioned incident, include an ahmedi, General sher khan. "
( quoting mr. anwar ali, DIG of CID , page 121 )
"Molvi mohammad ali of jalandhar , on 15th april, 1951, upon addressing a conference in Montgomery, said that they have a proof of the fact that ahmedis were involved in the rawalpindi cospiracy. Such was a meaningless claim!
** It was clearly a recomendation of hatred, and a hatred of a sinister type! ** nither is molvi mohammad ali capable of having such a proof, nor has any such proof been presented to the investigative tribunal. ** such rumours easily capture people’s minds**."
( page 329 )
A respected leader of the * ahrari * molvis, whose name i am leaving out, out of respect, has been quoted to say:
" An ahmedi spy has been caught in the house of gopal das, and i have provided great information to the government in this regard. "
( page 330 )
the tribunal comments:
" Can the normal, and simple people that such a respected person, who , inspite of being old, is still as sharp as a sword, will write such a ** false ** story about gopal das, which ** is not even by far, related to the truth. ** ? Had it been true, will people not be emotional against the ahmedis? **
** Knwoing that such a speech was a lie, if you are still neglecting this lie, then we may say that you repect his white hair, but you just ignore the unrest he is spreading in the nation. **"
( page 330 )
---------- ** Filthy language **
They narrate:
" ** As the time passed, their tones got worse. The molvis concentrated all their attention on swearing at the ahmedis, and started a shameful verbal abuses **"
( page 20 )
" an urdu newspaper, mazdoor, that is printed in multan, whose editor is abu zar bokhari, son of famous leader ataullah shah bokhari, ** in its issue of 13th june 1952, published an essay, in which, they wrote such disgraceful, cheap, and indecent language, that our decency does not allow us to reproduce it. **
** If such words had been said infront of an ahmedi, and as a result, he wouldve broken their skull, and we wouldnt have even been least surprised.
The words which were used, were completely and outrightly sinister, and speak of indecent behaviour. **"
( page 87 )
" 25th july, 1952, in qasoor, there was a meetng after the friday prayer, the speakers of which included alam shah, an outlaw. After this, a walk was started.
** a man would shout, “zafarullah kunjar”, and people would reply, " hai hai! " **
then alam shah brought some more men, who brought a female donkey, and wrote the words “mrs. zafrullah” on it.
** They made a man ride the donkey. the man wore a tophat, which said, “ghulam ahmed mirza”. He wore shoes around his neck. This walk ended at a factory owned by an ahmedi, where they shouted slogans: Destroy mirzaiyyat. zafarullah kutta; zafarullah kunjar; zafarullah soo’er ** "
( page 356 )
Place your hand, dear readers, on your heart, and tell me, has this anything to do with the preachings of prophet mohammad???
------------- ** killings and Violence: **
" Sayyed firdos shah, DSP , was attacked with knives and sticks, and was killed at the spot. Firdos shah’s body cotained 52 marks of injuries. "
( page 160 )
Here are some more examples of ** serving islam **:
" The same evening, Abdul hayee , who had tried to advise the crown not to start violence, was beaten and injured, and his house was robbed. "
( page 177 )
" The same evening, in sialkot, two ahmedis were killed with knives, the houses of three were looted"
( page 178 )
" On 7th march, a crowd killed a person, mohammad hussain, thinking that he is an ahmedi. After investigation, it was found out, that the person is not an ahmedi, and his enemy has made a move to get him killed."
( page 183 )
" On sixth march, a congregation was held, which moved towards an ahmedi mosque, and set it to fire"
( page 185 )
" The same evening more incidents of robbery and fire took place.
The ahmediyya commercial college, Noor art press, and pak restaurant ( owned by ahmedis) which are located in the different parts of the city, were broken through, by crowds, they robbed different things, broke and burn them.
A non ahmedi was a worker in noor art press, along with ahmedis, he was also killed with a knife, as they thought he was an ahmedi too."
( page 185 )
---------- **More Highlights of the service to islam **
" a crowd of ten thousand attacked the courts of the district, broke the windows, and forced the magistrates to close the courts. Then they entered the house of deputy commissioner . A food store of lyellpur textile mill, was robbed "
( page 188 )
" the railway line was broken. 3 trains were stoppd near the railway station. The shops and the passengers at the railway station were robbed. Many women were raped, and a cabin man was injured."
( page 188 )
" a crowd of three thousand reached the railway station, stopped a train for three hours. They boke the windows of the compartments, and the vacuum chains were broken too. The passenger women were raped."
( page 190 )
---------------- ** conclusion **
Such are the deeds of people, who call themselves the followers of the truth, claiming that they did all this to destroy the false faith of ahmediyyat!
What does these deeds depict? true faith? who saved the ahmedis thru this?
The decision is easy for a man of intellect.
[This message has been edited by jewels of insignificance (edited June 16, 1999).]