That Hindus converted to Islam by force or coersion is a very bold statement to make. You have to offer some evidence to back that up.
When you concider how much Hindus discriminate against people within Hinduism, it doesnt surprise me that people would want to convert into a more egalitarian religion. I dont see why that should be so unfathomable, that people would WANT to convert to Islam.
Im not trumpeting Islam, but it just seems logical that person who is told that they are considered “untouchable” by virtue of their birth, or someone told they must be a priest, or you and you ilk are only worthy of fighting, or you should only be dealing with money, these things would be a turn off for some segments of society.
If there was no appeal in Islam, then there wouldnt be nearly as many Muslims.
Whats cavalier is your assumption that Muslim forced people to convert. Seems like you might have a bit of chip on your shoulder yourself.
And its laughable that Hindu extremists think they know more off the family history of Muslims, then Muslims themselves. How obnoxious is that!
In fact a lot of your claims, seem to be pronouncements without any factual backing. So for example, certainly Hindu temples were destroyed, but how wide scale was this destruction? What was the motivation behind it? Was that destruction motivated purely by religious zealotry or something else?
I think there is far more complexity to the issue which you (and the Hindutva types) ignore, because its suites the victim narrative thats been cultivated over the years.