Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan's 'disappeared'

If you want to know how brutally Pakistan treats its people, you should meet Amina Janjua. An intelligent painter and interior designer, she sits on the vast sofa of her living room in Rawalpindi – a room that somehow accentuates her loneliness – scarf wound tightly round her head, serving tea and biscuits like the middle-class woman she is. And although neither a soldier nor a policeman has ever laid a hand on her, she is a victim of her country’s cruel oppression. Because, five years ago, her husband Masood became one of Pakistan’s “disappeared”.

It is a scandal and a disgrace and, of course, a crime against humanity. Ask not where Masood Janjua has gone – Amina does ask, of course, all the way up to the President – for he has entered that dark world wherein dwell up to 8,000 of Pakistan’s missing citizens, men, for the most part, seized from their homes or from the streets by cops and soldiers on the orders of spies and intelligence agents and Americans since 11 September, 2001. In Lahore alone, there are 120 “torture houses” just for the missing of the Punjab. Their shrieks of pain from the basements could be heard by residents – who complained only that the buildings might provoke bomb attacks. In Pakistan today, preservation counts for more than compassion.

Masood Janjua was 44 when he was “disappeared” on 30 July 2005. He ran an IT college and a travel agency, the father of two boys – Mohamed and Ali, and a girl, Aisha. He just never came home. Nobody saw what happened. Amina, who was 40 at the time, glows when she speaks of him. “We were so extremely close, so happy, our world was so heavenly – we were always visiting friends, having parties at home. He was so caring and kind to our children, so affectionate. That he should be taken from me! I think it was a very big mistake that they did. But when they do it – like this – they never say they were wrong.”

“They”. Everyone I talk to here talks about “they”. Many refuse to talk in case it provokes “them” to undertake a quick execution. “They” is the Inter-Services Intelligence. “They” is military intelligence. “They” are the Americans, some of them present – according to the few “disappeared” who have been released – during torture sessions. The Defence of Human Rights Pakistan (DHRP), the movement which Amina founded with 25 other bereft families, has gathered evidence of English-speaking interrogators who calmly ask victims questions during their torment. Ironically, Amina lives in a military district of Rawalpindi, beside an old British barracks, where US soldiers are observed in Pakistani uniforms – sometimes female American soldiers dressed, so she says, in the uniforms of Pakistani military paramedics.

Even more ironic was the first word she had of her husband after he disappeared. “When I went to the Supreme Court to demand his return, witnesses came forward to say they saw Masood inside an army barracks here in Rawalpindi, very close to his family. Just think – it was within walking distance from our home! He was inside a cell at 111 Brigade barracks. It was so sad for me – it was as if they were being cynical, to keep him so close to his family.”

Amina Janjua found that one of the court witnesses lived in Peshawar and she travelled to the North West Frontier Province to speak to him five months after her husband disappeared. “He had been in the army facility in Rawalpindi. The prisoners were kept in solitary confinement and only when they were taken to the lavatory did they come close to other prisoners. They were forced to wear big hoods – hoods that went right down and covered their shoulders – and the detainees would get no chance to talk to another human being. This man said my husband was there – he even heard the guard call him ‘Janjua’.”

There is evidence that Pakistan’s “disappeared” are moved around, between barracks and interrogation centres and underground torture facilities in different towns and cities. There are also terrible rumours – fostered, some say, by the security authorities – that the army has thrown detainees from helicopters, that the cops dispose of bodies at night by dumping them in swamps or in open countryside so that decay and animal mutilation will cover the marks of torture before the bodies are found. But Amina Janjua believes most of them are alive. You might say she has to believe that.

“After 9/11, everyone was worried. People were ruthlessly disappeared after the New York attacks. No one knew why their loved ones were taken. The first few months were like hell for me. Then I regained my consciousness and said I could not accept all this. I said I would fight. I said I would get my husband back.” Brave words. Brave lady.

So she turned to the only brave institution still fighting in Pakistan: the lawyers and the judges and the courts. So far, the Supreme Court in Islamabad and the Lahore High Court have squeezed around 200 detainees out of the maw of the country’s security apparatus – those, that is, who were still in Pakistan. Many are known to have been freighted off to the tender mercies of the Americans at Bagram in Afghanistan, where Arab detainees have long ago testified to being beaten and sodomised with broom sticks. There have been prisoner murders, too, in Bagram, the jail that President Barack Obama refuses to close.

“At the beginning, I went to the International Red Cross about Masood,” Amina Janjua says. “I saw them over several months. There was no progress. My father-in-law went to many people, he even went to President Musharraf – he trained in the military with Musharraf and they knew each other very well – and Musharraf said, ‘I will do something for you’– but he never did. After that, when we called the President’s house, they would start avoiding us. We wrote to all the Pakistan intelligence agencies. All said my husband could not be found.”

Many families have been given false hopes. “In some villages way out in the country,” Amina recalls, “families were told by the authorities that their sons were coming home. These were poor people but they were so happy, so delighted. They would hold a party and give out sweets and slaughter valuable animals to show their happiness. But then the sons didn’t come home. Can you imagine treating people like this?”

Amina Janjua’s fraudulent hope came in a phone call in 2006, a year after Masood’s disappearance. "We had our first breakthrough when the military secretary of the President called Masood’s father to say that his son was alive and that they had heard about him, though he had been ill – in a fever. That was our first sign of relief.

“Then he started avoiding us again. There was no message after that. Then we were told ‘No, he is not with us, but we are making every effort because the President has made this request to help you.’ I went on asking senior people in the army what had happened to my husband, and they – I put it like this – they started shivering. They would shudder. They could not disclose any information.”

Teaching herself law and fighting her own case, Amina Janjua returned to the Supreme Court. “When I did this, I started hearing of many other cases and things that are happening. And that’s when I realised. It’s not about ‘missing’ people – this is about abduction. I started organising files on these abducted people and eventually I had 788 families on my list and I started conducting research. And we got about 200 prisoners released. The courts ordered this. They were all still in Pakistan. Others, we know, had been taken to Bagram, three or four to Guantanamo Bay where at least we knew they were alive.”

But Amina’s research could prove terrifying. She discovered not only that abducted men were alive. They were also dead. “I suspected some of them had died,” she said. "I know of three prisoners who are dead. One was Mohamed Shafiq; he was a coach driver and they released his death certificate – it said he died of ‘some illness’. He was in his 40s. One of the prisoners, a businessman called Said Menon, died shortly after he was released.

“All of the 200 we got released had been tortured. Initially, it was very ruthless – they were not allowed to sleep; there were beatings and thrashings; they were hanged upside down. There was loud music. There were actual torture rooms where the things were done to them. The prisoners told us they didn’t think their torturers were human beings at all. The faces of the torturers, they said, were horrifying. It was no longer a real world for them. The torturers seemed so powerful, like monsters, so big.”

The questions they were asked were repetitive, according to Amina Janjua. Where are the guns? Where are the weapons? Where is Mullah Omar? Two prisoners described to Amina’s committee how they were made to wear orange jumpsuits, shaven till they were bald and taken for questioning to Islamabad. “They were interrogated by foreigners – they could see them. They were English-speaking. They didn’t know if they were Americans or British.”

The DHRP now holds public protests in all the cities of Pakistan where the prisoners have their homes – in Lahore, Sagoda, Quetta, Faisalabad, Karachi, Peshawar – but the families focus on Islamabad where they demonstrate their fury and their anguish outside the Supreme Court and the offices of President Asif Ali Zardari and the Prime Minister, Yousuf Raza Gilani. The DHRP files show that there are 1,700 missing from Baluchistan alone. At least 4,000 appear to be in the hands of the Pakistani interior ministry, while 2,000 have been handed over to what the DHRP describes as “foreign agencies” – usually, the Americans. Perhaps 750 of the missing Pakistanis are believed to have been taken by the Americans – illegally, of course – to Bagram, the Policharki prison outside Kabul, or to Herat in western Afghanistan.
Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan’s ‘disappeared’ - Robert Fisk, Commentators - The Independent


The war against terror, a myth or reality? When our own government is selling its citizens, who do we trust? Then the supporters of Mush and the likes say “oh you’re a traitor speaking against the army blah blah”.. I wonder how would Mush feel if his own son was abducted, I doubt he would feel anything…

Re: Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan's 'disappeared'

Yet again, shame on the Pakistan Army, shame on the ISI

There are two kinds of missing persons.

  1. Islamists terrorists that have declared war on Pakistani nation and doing Global Jihad
  2. Ethnic terrorists that have declared war on country called Pakistan but they are local to Pakistan.

Each of these groups are killing and murdering our jawans, our officers, and our policemen as if there is no end.

Many members of both of these groups have gone overseas as well.

Saying that all 8,000 are in police/army custody is not true.

And recently setup judicial commission will certainly bring the reality to the forefront.

Re: Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan's 'disappeared'

^ You cannot prove anything against them without trail (which is right of even residents of Guantanamo bay).

The army should atleast have the courage to tell us if they killed them, sold them or keeping them for fun. The military is not even bothered to reply to summons from the courts.

Wow so you're like a Dictator's chamcha right? I say this cuz you don't have more than 2 categories.. [both being bad]. You must be living in Wonderland.

Well. Add your category then! Which category do you belong to (or would like to add).

Hopefully you are not one of the missing persons (Allah maaf kuray)

Missing persons case is definitely gross violation of human rights but and most of the people who are missing were had close working relationship with the taliban/alqaeda or indian funded BLA/BRA .

as case of amna janjua, i dont think any body had asked her seriously anything related to his husbands involvement in taliban/alqaeda causes.

still it is not the solution and not the way state should behave they should learn to collect corroborate evidence but we should not show these people victims as well without questioning their background.

lets hope that these guys come out soon.

The burden of proof of his guilt is on the authorities who abducted him.

Even if you don't want a trial and do 'off with his head', atleast tell her that you murdered her husband.

This is the first BS I've read on the issue, may be I missed previous BS in the past. There are people who were simple masjid-namazis, there are people who were simply helpers of needies (not the refugee helper) who have gone missing, thanks to lack of intelligence in our intelligence agency they created mistrust in people against their own security apparatus/army.

Re: Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan's 'disappeared'

can someone explain the motivation they attribute to the ISI/Army for picking up random people and keeping them in jail?

i understand that a section of anyone imprisoned, even in those through the legal process, is always innocent. but I dont understand why ISI would pick up just random people. What could their motivation be?

Re: Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan's 'disappeared'

^ Military in Pakistan considers itself above law in our dear homeland.

Re: Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan's 'disappeared'

that doesnt describe their motivation, but the process they're employing. Why is ISI picking up completely random people?

Re: Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan's 'disappeared'

^ They are not random. Supposedly have connections with 'terrorism' as daddy Cheney describes it. ISI or 'hassas idaray' have always picked up, tortured and kept in custody people suspected of spying in particular. This was escalated during Mushy's time when we started even selling them.

You know!

This is the most thankless comment about our shaheed Soldiers and officers.

Your comment is very similar to the ones made during Lal masjid fiasco.

We had our officers (from police and army) being murdered by the Islamists.

And still

most of the commentators were crying for the Mullahs and their well being
While
avoiding a single thank you note for our soldiers,

And

even less about the our shaheed soldiers' families who are now without their fathers, their sons, and their brothers, just because

Islamist Mullahs decided to change a mosque into a source of death and destruction.

You all say that persons have disappeared. This is no different than what so many Islamists are doing. They disappear in the hell hole of FATA and Afghanistan in order to start their Jihad.

And then you blame Pak gov for not doing something about it.

Look at the case of 5 DAAKTARS from Virginia, USA.

They came to fight alongside other terrorists. Were they not caught by the law enforcement agents,

you would all be blaming army for their disappearances.

The only one above the law right now are the terrorists groups in Pak the ones known as Islamists, or the ethnic fascists.

If it was not for our brave soldiers, you all will be OK in the comfy apartments in the West, but

the Pakistanis would be living in a hell not too different from the Islamic Jannatain called Somalia, and Aghanistan.

Re: Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan's 'disappeared'

^ Burqa, abducting and killing people randomly is as inhumane as the deeds of your so called 'islamist terrorists'.

If I criticize our generals, does that mean I support terrorists?

You need not copy-paste the same rhetoric in every thread, you know.

Why 'terrorism' in quotes?

I understand that ISI has always picked up and tortured people suspected of spying in particular. In essence people suspected of being anti-state. The question is whether that criterion is changed now? And are we lobbying to change the general policy of picking up anti-state people, or just these people suspected of 'terrorism'? do you have a track record of arguing for the release of suspected indian spies for example?

OK then criticize General X, or Y or Z. and show what he has done wrong.

But if you say the whole military is above the law (like you did in your post),

then you are doing

disservice to the sacrifices of our Shaheed and Ghazis. And

by putting down our shaheeds and ghazis, you are supporting our enemies that right now are the "terrorists"

Got it?

Re: Robert Fisk: Into the terrifying world of Pakistan’s ‘disappeared’

^ If the military comes out and says those people were terrorists and we killed/sold/kept them, I have no issues. If as an institution they think they are above law and not answerable to Pakistani people/courts, I would say that how it is.

Your logic that if I criticize anything/anyone except the terrorists, I am supporting them, is beyond me. I asked something http://www.paklinks.com/gs/pakistan-affairs/409927-what-jinnah-said-usa.html#post7246803 here to clarify it.

To make deer admit that he is the elephant who was thief, now many people will call it conspiracy theory.

My question to you: Why would "intelligence agency" pickup people to locate likes of Mullah Omar/OBL? I mean are they so dumb that they can't follow the trails? Why pickup people who can actually lead them to the destination and sound alarms for the actual guys?

The problem with the logic is flawed bhai.

There are 3,000 suicide bombers ready to strike at the heart of Pakistan. How many of them are in the list of "missing persons".

Obviously they are being held "hostage" by Islamists

and not the military.