everything in life comes with choices and change.
it is all parties who are taking risks.
no one can wait for the perfect most choice at all times.
what does it tell about the character of the risk aversed?
some human beings may be that unsure of their ability to improvise and take control of their lives.
why do people fail to see that perceptions can be flawed and simplicity in thought is better suited to approach a choice and a change, rather than hasty risk aversion? why?
I don't think the above argument is adequately structured. It seems you want us to argue in accordance with how you view risk averse people. Please elaborate on the question without presenting an argument at the same time.
i see what you are saying.
perhaps this will make my point a bit more clear.
is risk aversion typical in situations where a given individual magnifies one thing over the rest of the information or observation?
if so, is it logical to be risk aversive, when in reality there is not a risk, but it is perceived as such?