Re: Religious parties spreading conspiracy wave against Malala!
Are you sure ?
This is their play , Dual triple games by these fools .
Re: Religious parties spreading conspiracy wave against Malala!
Interestingly, it was few years ago I was thinking about the subject Pak Studies that gets taught from grade 5th on wards (or even sooner) to the paK school kids, and my personal opinion was that this course alone is a very strong reason of cultivating strong feelings against non muslim past of people who lived in modern day Pakistan in particular against Hindus. When you are ten or so years old and the curriculum teaches you that people in sub continent open heartily welcome islam without any issues and how mughals and islamic emporers were next to god like individuals. No one ever questions the need of
→ why several muslim leaders from up north, from modern day Tajikistan and other neighboring states, people like Ghaznavis, Taimoours, Ghoouris, Tughlighs, Mughals, Duraanis etc etc kept coming to India?
→ Were there any other reasons behind Arab invasion of Sindh via Mohammad Bin Qasim other than it was to come to rescue of a helpless woman.
In my personal opinion, most of those invaders were far more interested in the wealth of weak and divided Indian states than any other motive, and Islam and spread of deen was no way near their priorities. But saying that in Pak where people are studying a subject like PakStudies and grown being brain washed since 5th grade will be no less than a blasphemous.
Re: Religious parties spreading conspiracy wave against Malala!
Interestingly, it was few years ago I was thinking about the subject Pak Studies that gets taught from grade 5th on wards (or even sooner) to the paK school kids, and my personal opinion was that this course alone is a very strong reason of cultivating strong feelings against non muslim past of people who lived in modern day Pakistan in particular against Hindus. When you are ten or so years old and the curriculum teaches you that people in sub continent open heartily welcome islam without any issues and how mughals and islamic emporers were next to god like individuals. No one ever questions the need of
--> why several muslim leaders from up north, from modern day Tajikistan and other neighboring states, people like Ghaznavis, Taimoours, Ghoouris, Tughlighs, Mughals, Duraanis etc etc kept coming to India?
--> Were there any other reasons behind Arab invasion of Sindh via Mohammad Bin Qasim other than it was to come to rescue of a helpless woman.
In my personal opinion, most of those invaders were far more interested in the wealth of weak and divided Indian states than any other motive, and Islam and spread of deen was no way near their priorities. But saying that in Pak where people are studying a subject like PakStudies and grown being brain washed since 5th grade will be no less than a blasphemous.
you say that openly and you will be killed by your driver...
and yes most if not all of them were looters who wanted indian wealth to support their armies and crumbling states.....one's imagination needs to be extended beyond proportion to call these looters Muslim heroes..ironically these very heroes killed our own ancestors!
Re: Religious parties spreading conspiracy wave against Malala!
In my personal opinion, most of those invaders were far more interested in the wealth of weak and divided Indian states than any other motive, and Islam and spread of deen was no way near their priorities. But saying that in Pak where people are studying a subject like PakStudies and grown being brain washed since 5th grade will be no less than a blasphemous.
wallahu khairul maakireen, whatever they were interested in, we should be thankful to Allah for making them source for us, no? yes I agree they should not be made 'Superman' or 'Mr Incredible'.
Re: Religious parties spreading conspiracy wave against Malala!
i know many people don’t like najam sethi but spot on analysis..logical and to the point..worth listening!
Re: Religious parties spreading conspiracy wave against Malala!
Pakistani Taliban Declare War on Media - The Daily Beast
Malala Yousafzai has taken one more step in her very long and difficult journey. Separated from her family for now, the 14-year-old Pakistani schoolgirl arrived today at Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Britain’s primary receiving facility for military casualties returning from overseas. Doctors say she still has not regained consciousness since being shot in the head by a Pakistani Taliban gunman who forced his way into a van full of schoolgirls, asked for her by name, and opened fire.
The attack has provoked unprecedented levels of public outrage, both in Pakistan and Afghanistan—even among people who have in the past sympathized with the militants. “First of all, attempting to kill a 14-year-old girl is a low act,” says Mullah Yahya, who was a high-ranking Afghan Information Ministry official back in the 1990s, when Mullah Mohammed Omar’s regime was in power. “Second, claiming responsibility for it is a sign that the [Pakistani] Taliban are not aware of the media’s importance. I have seen more anger against the religious elements in the past week than in all my 40 years of life.” Pakistan’s interior minister, Rehman Malik, says the government has posted a $1 million bounty](http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/15/one-million-dollar-bounty-in-malalas-attack/) on Ehsanullah Ehsan, the Pakistani Taliban spokesman who claimed responsibility for the shooting.
So how are the Pakistani Taliban responding to so much public condemnation? By declaring war on individual journalists and the media, of course. “For days and days, coverage of the Malala case has shown clearly that the Pakistani and international media are biased,” says a Pakistani Taliban commander in South Waziristan. “The Taliban cannot tolerate biased media.” The commander, who calls himself Jihad Yar, argues that death threats against the press are justified: he says “99 percent” of the reporters on the story are only using the shooting as an excuse to attack the Taliban.
**Jihad Yar does not apologize for the attempt to assassinate the girl, who was passionately opposed to the militants’ efforts to close girls’ schools. “We have no regrets about what happened to Malala,” he says. “She was going to become a symbol of Western ideas, and the decision to eliminate her was correct.” There’s proof, he says: video footage of her meeting America’s ambassador to Pakistan. “If she was not important for the West’s agenda, why would a U.S. ambassador meet her?” In the next breath, the commander insists that “Malala’s case is not important. The Taliban will not spare journalists who focus on this one girl and never talk about dozens of girls who have been killed by U.S. drones in tribal areas and Afghanistan.”
**
It may be possible that “dozens of girls” have died in drone attacks against the militants, but all too often there’s no way to investigate such accusations. Independent reporters seldom dare to visit Taliban-controlled territory these days. “It isn’t possible for the press to trust the Taliban,” says Noor Rahman Sherzad, an Afghan journalist now living in Sweden. “They’ve kidnapped and killed too many reporters.” He was based in Jalalabad until 2007, when the Taliban bombed his house. “I used to get calls every day from the Taliban, saying ‘we killed dozens of U.S. soldiers,’ but how could I report that without confirmation? The Taliban never understood the basic rules of journalism.” They didn’t give up even after he left the country. Instead, Sherzad says, they kidnapped his brother, a TV cameraman. They promised to release him—if Sherzad would return to Afghanistan and appear before a Taliban court. Luckily his brother escaped.
A Pakistani female supporter of a political party Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM) shouts slogans during a protest procession against the assassination attempt by Taliban on child activist Malala Yousafzai in Karachi, on Oct. 14, 2012. (Rizwan Tabassum / Getty Images)
Mullah Yahya agrees with Jihad Yar that the media and the Americans are side by side against the Taliban. “But I would blame the Taliban as well,” he says. “If they allowed independent media to visit Taliban-controlled areas, it could have a very positive effect on their coverage. In fact we have suggested this to their media department, but they’re only interested in kidnapping reporters, not in cooperating with them. Their information ministry thinks all other journalists are spies or are working for Western goals. They’re wrong, but we don’t make their decisions.” Anyway, he says, it’s probably too late to mend relations now. (In fact, the Afghan Taliban used to welcome foreign journalists until a few years ago.)