that is debatable, even if i acted immorally, i went against moral teachings of my religion.
I will discuss your behavior with my management.
Being a Muslim I believe only Allah is God, and i have been using these two words interchangeably. But at that post I was replying to argument of “Abrahamic religions and other religions”. At the same time if you believe in some other “Gods”, I have no problem at all with you.
What exactly do you mean in reply #2?. The question was simple: if an old friend turned gay, and he wants to visit you (as a friend), would you host him? If he wants to stay a few days, would you let him? And not judge him? In other words, be a good human being?
You have clearly stated " Abrahamic religion or other religions Allah sent upon humanity". So you were referring to non-Abrahamic religions also that Allah sent upon humanity.
I had not understood your responses to my questions 1 and 2. I asked for clarification. So could you please answer those questions in simple, easy to understand sentences?
Thank you.
For your convrnience here are the questions from post 77
I have 3 questions for you.
Bringing up animals during discussion of homosexuality, in a thinly veiled attempt to link the two - do you consider this moral behavior?
would you allow an old friend who turned gay to visit your house and stay few days. And not judge him?
This will allow me to gauge your morality. And correlate that with your religiosity.
Southie stay on topic. I revised my premise as you could not get other related premises. My personality or religion is not subject to this discussion.
Topic at hand now is, just prove how morality is/was possible without religion?
I am staying on topic. You defined morality and and asked us if your definition of morality is acceptable. You wanted us to prove that morality is possible without religion. So I am setting out to prove immorality is possible with religion.
Since YOU brought up the connection between religion and morality, the ONLY way for me to prove beyond reasonable doubt is to use YOUR own positions and posts as examples to disprove your hypothesis.
By the way, YOU are the one who also stated Allah is default God. I am absolutely happy to stay away from addressing a specific religion. “I am revising my premise because you could not get other related premises”. What does this sentence even mean? Seriously. State your position in easy to understand language.
My questions remain. The answers to which will help prove my case.
You ask me to “Prove” an opinion. And you wont even answer simple questions. Just answer them. And we move forward. Or you go right ahead conducting this debate with made up rules.
Of course I do. But my friend, let me remind you - this thread is about " morality is possible ONLY with religion". And I humbly beg to differ with that “premise”.
I think this is a valid question and should be addressed properly to carry this discussion further. I would go with option (1) and would not go with option (2). Morality is a relative term, which vary from society to society and we need to see cultural and social fabric of a society besides religion to assess its moral values.