Re: Religion, Science, Bla! Bla!
You missed the red part of his sentence.
He is saying from the Jesuit priest’s perspective he is an atheist.
That could be his sarcasm. No need to break the sentence my friend to make up something.
For example:
Person A calls person B retard. The person A comes to you and says " IceSoul, from Person A’ view I am a retard"
Will you spread to the whole world, … Person A said “He is a retard” ?
Did you get this point?
Einstein was against what was presented by the bible and priests.
He wrote in a letter in 1954.
**"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind”
**
He cannot even separate the two. And you say he was atheist.
He did not believe in God the way those days organized religions portrayed the religion, but he could not dissociate himself from believing in God, no matter how he perceived it.
If you say he was an agnostic by some of his words/questions, fine but not an atheist.
Regarding God of Spinoza and Richard Dawkin, I have a feeling you don’t have the basic tool to discuss that. Sorry that is from your responses so far. Try to comment on one of my thread in Philosophy section I think titled " What is nature".