Re: Regular review of chat/blogs/PMs
if you have any brain (that I think most of our CMs and admins have) you never look at one single screenshot and reach the complete verdict. Lets say that someone produces a screenshot of a conversation between Philosophy and TLK where TLK said that I think you are (insert a derogatory term here). Now Muzna will look at it for instance, and ask that why TLK said that? Did Philosophy instigate him, did she say something that he said such in return .. and all that. Now however Muzna is asking such questions, one thing is for sure that TLK did violate a policy and all the investigation is about if Philosophy also said something that screenshot taker did not capture.
In nutshell, TLK will be penalized, but that does not mean that Philosophy was innocent. Absence of proof is not always proof of innocence, you know what I mean!