Radicalism Re-defined

[underthecross]

Re: Radicalism Re-defined

@Fraudz

I mean how far would you go to find guilt? is there a point where culpability s no longer a factor

Yup plausible question? But paying taxes as being a national of a country or a company paying royalty to a company paying taxes are two very different things, btw you are justifying that people in Pakistan should drink amrat cola and burn pizza hut and kfc..

[Mr_Fraudia]

Re: Radicalism Re-defined

@underthecross

Yup plausible question? But paying taxes as being a national of a country or a company paying royalty to a company paying taxes are two very different things, btw you are justifying that people in Pakistan should drink amrat cola and burn pizza hut and kfc..

not at all, i dont believe in the same type pf thinking as u do, so I am doing quite the opposite and showing that such arguments of accountability by association are lame to say the least.

additionally, if a country is democratic and its govt is doign something u dont like u liam that its citizens can be targets because they have a voice and they did not us it. Why do citizens of a dictatorship get of scott free, they have the ability to rise up and overthrow the monrachs..but they dont.

[Mr_Fraudia]

Re: Radicalism Re-defined

@underthecross

I did not talk about sectarian shiet , this thread is not about that , so don’t bring it here.

u claimed that there is no such thing as extremism, I showed you that there is.

[underthecross]

Re: Radicalism Re-defined

**Dear Fraudia

Firstly thanks allot for providing the ultimate example of an “appeaser”, Who better then “Fraudz” (a legendry guppy) getting entangled in the play of words and unconsciously confirming the truth. But your kids might portray a different picture, only time will tell.:)

Secondly getting the sectarian aspect into it is totally lame and stupid. As our prophet “PBUH” said “That any one who makes sects in Islam is not part of us”. There are sects, but the truth of the matter is any one who believes in the “kalma” is a Muslim, and most of the westerners don’t hold this qualification. So you can’t define “Extremism” in the same perspective.

Thirdly, At least from you I expected you would not make this thread personal by attributing different biases to me, As I said in the start of the thread I don’t have any bias. I was just trying to get the truth out, the truth that most of the Muslims in the west don’t even dare to tread upon.

Fraudz Rather then foaming at the mouth and catching just one sectarian aspect to mislead the readers of the thread(which is quite pathetic) you should have produced a substantial counter argument with significant facts, which you failed to do so.
**