Re: Radicalism Re-defined
just like there is an inherent fallacy in the definition of radical and non radical, there is falalcy in turning that to a simple appeaser and non appeaser role also.
what is the source of this? or did you come up with this crap yourself :)
by your logic of , if a person has a vote he is responsible for actions of his cmndr in chief and thus a target, how do u know that the person voted, how do you now that person voted for someone else, how do you know that person had the ability to vote when voting took place. Its pure BS. type of stuff extremeists conjure up to try and legitimize their actions against civilians.