Qurbaani ka gosht

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

I don’t get it either…but this is an argument that I never thought to bring up. I will next time.
Though I’m always told to shut it about these sorts of debates. :hinna:

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

Haha.

Better to mix all meat then divided into three parts

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

Good and very troublesome comments above.

AFAIK:

Qurbani is for Allah and under his command.

It is only wajib and not fard. ( If anyone has different evidence then I am glad to change what I said)

It is only for those who are "saahib e nisaab" or eligible to do Qurbaani. (Search and read who is saahib e nisaab)

It is recommended that the meat is divided equally and judiciously in three parts to distribute as follows:

1- Yourself
2- Your relatives
3- Poor and needy people.

A- Now if you choose to donate all to needy and poor. No problem. Perhaps the best thing to do IMHO. Nothing to lose in terms of sawaab.

B- If you choose to donate to relatives or poor and needy randomly. Still not a problem.

C- *If you choose to select people who you donate based on your own bias. BIG problem! and bad thing to do. Never do that.
*

**To be safe:

**Just mix all meat, including from good or bony and less meaty parts of the animal body and do not look at the meat at all yourself to not be biased.

And then divide in three parts to distribute, as described above.

P.S. Carcasses or skin are not included in my above discussion.

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

Adding here: If anyone sends QURBANI meat to someone to get any wordly gain or benefit such as sends the best part of meat like thigh or shank to boss. That may mitigate the sawaab hereafter since the intention is not pure.
Just saying but hope not.

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

There! I liked your first ever post. :)

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

its not wrong, but sunnah/recommendation is there for some reason, there must be some hikmat in it. sometimes donate all, some times do the division practice

its a special case during hajj, its for our own help that we donate all of it. if someone can easily manage to do the division part and can manage to bring back 1/3 for relatives/friends and 1/3 for themselves, then why not? but almost no one will do that except those who live there, even not all of them

yes there are a lot of needy people, but rejecting the way recommended by sharia, every time consistently is also not right [not talking about the practice during hajj]

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

I can live with that........

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

If anyone of our relative havent done qurbani we give the ghost to them and vice versa

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

lolzz@ syaapa

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

Back then, people did not have enough meat to eat so it was recommended that when they do Qurbani, keep 1/3rd for yourself.. Now you and me eat meat 3 times a day. I really dont see how we are violating Shariah if we give away all the meat.

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

back then, not all were poor. just like today not all saheb-e-nisaab can affored to eat meat 3 times a day : ) and the key was "every time consistently" anyway, that was just my point of view, i could be wrong.

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

I remember a hadees (and I could be totally wrong in the context) that prophet slaughtered 80 camels with his own hands and distributed the whole meat and did not keep a single boti for himself.

I will try to find that hadees.

Re: Qurbaani ka gosht

I’m sure if you remember you will find the reference too. when you are at that i’m sure you can also find hadees or asaar from sunnat-e-nabawi :saw2: where this practice of division was mentioned

just like there was a time when Nabi :saw2: asked sahaba for infaq, hazrat abu bakar siddiq raziallahoanho brought all of his belongings, and nabi :saw2: accepted it. then there was an incident when a sahabi raziallahoanho (i dont remember name) wanted to ask if he can do sadqa of all his money, nabi :saw2: replied that its better to leave your children ghanni, instead of them asking others for help. and the common belief of making wasiiyat of sadqa of 1/3 of your all wealth, not the whole wealth.

i was trying to make a point that both are right, sometimes distribute all, sometimes do the division. parhaps i could not explain properly that created confusion