okay so muslims after pious caliphate came to be called sunnis ! these were enmies of prophet ! what about those who were not enemies of prophet what were they called ?
and if hadith were all fabricated to suit the kings after caliphs why isnt a single authentic hadith in praise of these kings ?
why is a huge abundance of hadith in praise of prophets family
why dont sunnis aee these kings as legal authority and call them maliks or tyrants
why is the seerah and rijal full of conflict between companions and tabeen ? if hadith was just a white wash
so if abu huraira fabricated hadith for ummayyads we can also infer that he fabricated this traditions that "my God dont let me like live long enough to see 60AH " ( yr when yazid came to power, abu huraira died in 59 AH) or "if i tell you hadth of prophet my head will be severed " or tradition of ghadir which is a huge merit of ummayyads grts enemy Ali
read khilafat-o-malookiat by maulana maududi if nothing else to understand how tyrants came to power in islam , it has nothing to do with rise of hadith literature.
whoever made this video is blissfully ignorant of the complicated early islamic history and rise of historirical writings so dont waste everybodies time if thats the best you can come up with