Re: Quotes from Pak vs Eng 2005 Series
This is so funny
Joking around
November 23
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/inline/content/image/227143.jpg?alt=1
A gripping read © Andrew Miller
Let’s start with a joke.
“A bowler was up against a stone waler [sic] who never moved his bat. Every ball either hit the bat or passed harmlessly by no stroke being offered. The bowler turned to the umpire.
‘Is he out if he doesn’t move bat?’
‘No,’ said the umpire, ‘but he will be, if he does.’”
No, I’m afraid I don’t get it either, and if the subs at Cricinfo had any decency, nor would you. But this rib-tickler, among several others, has already been considered suitable for a publication far weightier than mine. If it’s good enough for the Faisalabad Cricket Association Souvenir Brochure, then it’s good enough for me.
In fact, the more I think about it, the more convinced I become that the joke must be funny and it’s me whose humour is lacking. Why? Because the number of hoops that poor pun had to jump through to make it to the page simply beggars belief. One organising committee, eight sub-committees and 104 good citizens of Faisalabad went into the creation of this match brochure. No wonder it didn’t appear until the Test was all but over.
Bureaucracy is a lifestyle choice in Pakistan. Hundreds upon thousands of diligent desk-jockeys spend their lives weaving knots of such complicity that they could be framed and hung on the wall in Ye Olde Fisherman’s Tavern in Falmouth. At irregular intervals throughout this tour, for instance, a sheet of paper has been handed around the press-box, requiring the same familiar faces to provide the same familiar details, like schoolchildren signing the truancy register. I haven’t yet seen Edd the Duck and Bungle being entered into the class, but it’s only a matter of time.
But back to the brochure. It is less a celebration of the cricket (“A game of fluctuating fortunes and glorious uncertainties” as one contributor puts it), and more a once-in-a-lifetime chance for those faceless armies of administrators to emerge like butterflies into the limelight. No fewer than 20 of the 58 available pages are dedicated to those men who make the city tick, including 11 full pages of colour photos. The teams, meanwhile, are afforded a grand total of four.
There’s a 25-man organising committee. There’s a reception sub-committee. A stadium renovation sub-committee. A law & order sub-committee. A technical sub-committee. A ground sub-committee. A medical sub-committee. A finance sub-committee. A liaison sub-committee. A media sub-committee. A brochure sub-committee. And a 25-man co-ordination sub-committee. Which is presumably there to co-ordinate the sub-committees.
But it’s not all about lists and mugshots. There’s a useful section on fielding positions (“an often neglected part of the game”), 15 important questions for an umpire (“What are the necessary qualifications of an umpire?” Answer: “Counters, pencil and paper, MCC laws book, balls, bails and bowler’s mark drying material”), a trawl through the places of historical interest in and around Faisalabad, and two blank pages for those all-important autographs. Of the sub-committees, naturally.
But let’s finish back where we began, with a joke.
“Great English Cricketer WG Grace was at the crease, he turned to the wicketkeeper.
‘Tell me, my man, just out of interest, how many great players would you say there are?’
‘One less than you think’”
Great administrators, on the other hand, are in an abundance.