Questions Any Intelligent Journalist Should Ask About the London Bombings

Hangout GupShup Cafe
1

Got this in my mail today:

Questions Any Intelligent Journalist Should Ask About the London Bombings

In today’s controlled media, no journalist will be willing to push the
boundaries and ask the challenging questions that should be asked of a
government increasingly complicit in the recent London bombings.

Here are just 12:

  • CCTV cameras were not working in the area at the time of the explosions -
    the average Londoner is caught on camera three hundred times a day. Who
    was responsible for disabling the cameras on the morning of July 7th?

  • Witnesses say they saw “white” people setting off the bombs, not dark
    skinned people. Which group do these obviously non-Muslim people belong
    to?

  • The explosives are said to be military - very difficult to obtain within
    the UK, so they must have been smuggled in, past sniffer dogs and tight
    security at Britain’s borders (it’s a much smaller country to patrol than
    the US). Who arranged for the explosives to make it past Britain’s
    internal security?

  • Quotes from the Quran by the alleged group claiming responsibility for
    the attacks were incorrect - a strictly religious person would not make
    these mistakes. Who designed and built the site?

  • The DNS of the fake Islamic website was hosted in Maryland DC. Who was
    the (now defunct) website registered to?

  • A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running a
    drill exercise for an unnamed company which revolved around the London
    Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as was
    happening in real life on July 7th. This is precisely what happened on the
    morning of September 11th 2001 with the CIA conducting drills of flying
    hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. Are we
    the gullible people meant to simply swallow this coincidence again?

  • Benjamin Netanyahu, scheduled to give a speech near the site of the Tube
    explosion, was warned FIVE MINUTES before the attack to stay in his hotel.
    Sounds suspiciously like the same thing on 9/11 when the Israeli company
    Odigo, with an office at the World Trade Center, was warned, and 4,000 of
    it’s employees stayed home that day. Why are only Israeli’s warned just
    prior to calamatous events?

  • The UK is one of the most tolerant countries towards Muslims in Europe -
    much more so than Germany or France. What purpose would it serve for Muslim
    radicals to attack an otherwise welcoming British public?

  • Mobile phone network wasn’t suspended (to prevent detonation by phones).
    Is this an admission that phones cannot detonate explosives, as was claimed
    for the Madrid blasts?

  • “A co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos,” Sir
    Ian Blair told Sky News. Was this quote an intentional use of the direct
    translation of the Freemasons’ Satanic motto “Ordo Ab Chao”.

  • Why did a senior police officer tell the BBC less than twenty four hours
    before the London attacks that the London police felt that they were on top
    of the terrorist threat?

  • The London “terror alert” level was lowered before the bombings took
    place, thus giving the perpetrators extra cover to plan and execute the
    attack without having to evade the most stringent security. Who authorized
    the change in the terror alert level?

Source: http://www.threeworldwars.com/blog/

                     London Bombings Data Page

London Underground Bombing ‘Exercises’ Took Place at Same Time as Real

2

Re: Questions Any Intelligent Journalist Should Ask About the London Bombings

Any intelligent person should question these questions as they are full of incorrect facts, assumptions and generalizations.

3

Re: Questions Any Intelligent Journalist Should Ask About the London Bombings

would perhaps have carried a bit of credibility had the 4000 jews and WTC "incident" not been mentioned yet again. some people never learn.

4

Re: Questions Any Intelligent Journalist Should Ask About the London Bombings

  • CCTV cameras were not working in the area at the time of the explosions -
    the average Londoner is caught on camera three hundred times a day. Who
    was responsible for disabling the cameras on the morning of July 7th?

Only one CCTV camera was not working, the one on the bus. The bus company reported that this particular camera was known to be non-functional for a whole month beforehand

  • Witnesses say they saw “white” people setting off the bombs, not dark
    skinned people. Which group do these obviously non-Muslim people belong
    to?

The witnesses say they saw a white person fiddling in a bag.

  • The explosives are said to be military - very difficult to obtain within
    the UK, so they must have been smuggled in, past sniffer dogs and tight
    security at Britain’s borders (it’s a much smaller country to patrol than
    the US). Who arranged for the explosives to make it past Britain’s
    internal security?

The explosives are now reported as being acetone peroxide, made from common household chemicals available in supermarkets

  • Quotes from the Quran by the alleged group claiming responsibility for
    the attacks were incorrect - a strictly religious person would not make
    these mistakes. Who designed and built the site?

This is suspicious

  • The DNS of the fake Islamic website was hosted in Maryland DC. Who was
    the (now defunct) website registered to?

The DNS was hacked by a Maryland-based American in 2002 and re-registered under his name.

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,54455,00.html

The Al-Neda.com site continued to operate, but no longer on www.alneda.com. A similar example is how Gupshup had www.gupshup.com stolen from it.

  • A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running a
    drill exercise for an unnamed company which revolved around the London
    Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as was
    happening in real life on July 7th. This is precisely what happened on the
    morning of September 11th 2001 with the CIA conducting drills of flying
    hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. Are we
    the gullible people meant to simply swallow this coincidence again?

This is suspicious

  • Benjamin Netanyahu, scheduled to give a speech near the site of the Tube
    explosion, was warned FIVE MINUTES before the attack to stay in his hotel.
    Sounds suspiciously like the same thing on 9/11 when the Israeli company
    Odigo, with an office at the World Trade Center, was warned, and 4,000 of
    it’s employees stayed home that day. Why are only Israeli’s warned just
    prior to calamatous events?

**There are still conflicting stories about just when he was alerted. All versions, however, have him being alerted by the British Police. **

  • The UK is one of the most tolerant countries towards Muslims in Europe -
    much more so than Germany or France. What purpose would it serve for Muslim
    radicals to attack an otherwise welcoming British public?

Unlike Germany or France, Britain is occupying Iraq

  • Mobile phone network wasn’t suspended (to prevent detonation by phones).
    Is this an admission that phones cannot detonate explosives, as was claimed
    for the Madrid blasts?

3 of the 4 explosions happened in the underground tunnels, where the mobile phone networks cannot reach. Shutting down the networks would have had no effect. The authorities also stated that the mobile phone networks were being used by the emergency services to coordinate their response.

  • “A co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos,” Sir
    Ian Blair told Sky News. Was this quote an intentional use of the direct
    translation of the Freemasons’ Satanic motto “Ordo Ab Chao”.

This seems a little paranoid, given that there was some chaos followed by order

  • Why did a senior police officer tell the BBC less than twenty four hours
    before the London attacks that the London police felt that they were on top
    of the terrorist threat?

It would have caused a loss of faith in the authorities if he had said that they were unable to handle the terrorist threat

  • The London “terror alert” level was lowered before the bombings took
    place, thus giving the perpetrators extra cover to plan and execute the
    attack without having to evade the most stringent security. Who authorized
    the change in the terror alert level?

London never had stringent security at any time regardless of the “terror alert”. Come to think of it, I never even heard of a London “terror alert” before I left in January.

5

Re: Questions Any Intelligent Journalist Should Ask About the London Bombings

Well you just knew this was going to become a Muslim Urban myth. We had a whole thread going about this, and Netanyahu was not warned before the attacks, he was warned by London Police a few minutes AFTER the attacks. The initial reports were from some anonymous source who apparently did not have his times right. And just so we all know, journalists asked this particular question repeatedly at police press conferences, and the police were crystal clear in their reply.

Of course, that will not stop the conspiracy theorists who fail to actually follow events, and hope to imply that someone other than the suspects actually set off the bombs. Not suprising that stupid emails are now making the rounds, rather predictable really…

6

Re: Questions Any Intelligent Journalist Should Ask About the London Bombings

London bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down…

London bridge is falling down, my fair lady…:jhanda:

7

Re: Questions Any Intelligent Journalist Should Ask About the London Bombings

^^

I have no clue why that came to my mind…:konfused:

Have You...
Have You...
8

Re: Questions Any Intelligent Journalist Should Ask About the London Bombings

Your question are valid, credible and is saying what all academeic and inteligent British people are saying in quiet corners. You are with them or us tactics has scared alot of people. I wihs that Robin cook had a feew more weeks to live he would have spoken the truth and given courage for people to speak to!!

How comes the news just talk about the 21 July attempts and not 7th July any more!!

You could easily pick 4 people from the unfortunate dead in the 7th July atrocities adn link them to bombings and having had gone to the same holiday resorts ect ect ect

let have an inquiry but it has to open and fair not like the others before which have hidden the truth!!

And tell me that Iraqi war was legal!! even the government know it was not!! stop kidding yourselves guys!! wake up this is no conspiracay theory!!

ring up all the news channels and ask them to talk about the 7th July bobings i bet they are not getting any info from the govt!!

Who has benefited from bombings not the muslims!!! see all the changes inthe next year or so and then you wqill realise!! or has the govt jsut taken advantage of the situation!! does thatnot make them even worse!!!

kick out the hate preachers on both sides!!! yes yes but with the rule of the law and justice and not by the dungeon laws!!