Question.

Re: Question.

A blurry Jebus appeared on my omelette once, thought about building a shrine but was hungry so ate it instead.

As TLK mentioned, the langar is for everyone, it's more a community service thing than anything else. I have been brought up by Sikhs, so have occasionally helped with preparations. A Pakistani aunty learned of this and was horrified, so I thought I'd ask here and see what the opinions, and the reasoning behind the opinions, were.
It has been interesting reading. Thank you all.

Re: Question.

Guru Nanak was a Muslim !

wb queer.

Re: Question.

if preparing langar was unislamic, wouldnt the hundreds of thousands of muslims serving at restaurants in the states be committing kufr too?? i mean church people come every now and then to get food for their functions..

Re: Question.

hey r@@j good to see you still around man.. you should post more, how about a thread on baba nanak and islam?

Re: Question.

quran is for all mankind....so helping and feeding anyone is insaaniyat
but sajda to anyone even parents is forbidden...

Re: Question.

..

Re: Question.

contrary to the topic, just curious why Satan was punished for not prostrating in front of Adam??

queer shhh! ;)

Re: Question.

There is thread on it. check it out.

Re: Question.

Langar is a good thing to feed hungry. No doubt about it. But the question is related to it being as an act performed at a Gurdawara, to ptomote Sikhism.

Please don't even try to sugar coat something. The question is clear cut. The answer should be clear too.

And prostration to an Idol or picture or whatever other than Allah, or whom Allah said to prostrate is not islamic.

Why create a confusion?

Re: Question.

Strange isn't it!!!

How will you propagate Sikhism while helping in Langer? instead you would be helping individuals who have traveled long distance and/or have been there and due to whatever reasons are not capable enough to get food for themselves... how that can be unislamic???

on the same note... i don't understand that we as a muslim are ready to take whatever comes from non-muslims in terms of money, education, culture or you name it.. but when it is time to return then there come some so-called Islamic order/ruling/understanding....

Re: Question.

As per some, lunger is only Islamic when served to them and that is there is some good amount of meat/chicken in it… :slight_smile:

Re: Question.

There are other methods to show respect...bowing is certainly not one of them

Re: Question.

Kaaba is just indicator, which is required to unify/discipline all muslims in one direction, under no circumstances or any ruling of Islam give the status of GOD to the building of KAABA... and during Salat, it is not the Kaaba which should be in mind, the mind should be focused on the thought that "I am in front of All-Mighty" doesn't matter what place on earth it is...

Re: Question.

To the ignoramus who said that guru nanak dev ji was a muslim...its ppl like you that confirm my decision of not being a practicing muslim. If you have any sort of knowledge or education of religion..in this case the sikh religion, guru nanak dev jis first teaching was "na koi hindu na koi musalman", based on that. He was born into a hindu khatri family, but early on recieved a calling from God that his path was different..and he founded the sikh faith. Why i know so much about it...is because i have studied it and i respect it tremendously as a religion. Get your facts straight. I am sick of the distortions that allow any religion to be maligned and islam to be seen as good or the correct way..it isnt..its just one of many paths.

Topo..there is nothing wrong with helping with langar..its a service to humanity. langar is a community kitchen which denies no one..all ppl regardless of their race, religion and status sit together in the house of god and eat ...its a beautiful concept..and it is not shirk.
As for bowing before sri guru granth sahib ji...i have done it..and if i go to this supposed hell everyone is telling me of..so be it..i believe in god..and that is it..he is my ultimate authority

Re: Question.

understand and appreciate your respect towards other faiths..

FYI: there is wealth of info on a another discussion… you may find this interesting..

i concur that !

r@@j

Re: Question.

I briefly skimmed the thread..and yet again it shows the arrogance of all muslims..forget that a sikh would know more about their faith than anyone else..but no..apparently ppl like u and the rest of my fellow muslims..just have to know more..and on top of that disclaim everything..why cant u just accept it the way it is..i find it hypocritical..when u have ppl who are killed by our own fellow muslims..when they question islam..yet we can question any other religion and its ok

what if i said the prophet pbuh was a killer of jews..it is documented..he did it..what are u going to do to disprove it?

u know what after reading all the threads here and listening to others...i dont care to follow islam at all...consider me excommunicated

Re: Question.

Oh my, that thread is certainly something. I'm surpised Bhai Mardana wasn't mentioned, haha.

confused kuri, I understand your frustration but I'd never recommend renouncing something just on the basis of what other people have said. What people say about something isn't always relevant. Disagreements are par for the course.
If reason, critical thinking, and experience, tell you something isn't for you, then fair enough.

Re: Question.

El tap: just read the thread again, presence of bhai mardana is not missed there.

Konfused Gal: don't get upset, whats mentioned in not to confuse you but to help you.

r@@j

Re: Question.

Peace confused kuri

I hope you are well and welcome to GupShup and specifically the Religion forum. I've heard the famous statement before

"na koi hindu na koi musalman"

I have also heard that Guru Nanak Ji had learnt much about Islam. In fact Muslims and Hindus alike used to come to him for guidance and advice. I hope this much is true. I also heard that both communities used to fight over who he belonged to the Muslims used to claim him for themselves and the Hindus for themselves.

I'm punjabi so it is interesting to actually translate this statement:

"There is neither any Hindu nor any Muslim"

Now this is where my problem begins. Which does this statement mean?

a) Hindus or Muslims don't exist
b) Hindus or Muslims should not exist
c) The people present who claim to be Hindu are not and the people present who claim to be Muslim are not (for some reason)
d) We should not look at our differences of Hindu and Muslim but deal with each other on a human level

Now when you have answered this ... I would like to see how if possible this translates to mean that Vedantism or Islam is actually being denounced or rejected. Please explain this:

After explaining that then please explain that if both Vedantism and Islam are not right then how can we still claim that there are many paths to God because at least two of them have been ruled out. Unless of course some people are giving the statement more meaning than it is supposed to contain.

"na koi hindu na koi musalman", something to think over!

Re: Question.

Ah, I got distracted with all the Chola talk.