Michael Moore in Farenheit 9/11 mentions how the verdict of the US Supreme Court could have been challenged if ..I think it was 3 (?)Senators..objected to the verdict. Is that true? Could someone shed some light on that incident and also explain what was the reasoning of the Democrats in the Senate for not challenging the verdict?
I believe it is actually 1 senator. Not 3.
becasue they all knew that Al Gore had lost and there was no reason to continue the drama any further.
because it's a topi drama .. this liberal-conservative... Dem-Republican thing is good to keep the idiots occupied into thinking they are really voting for a change..
cuz all are A grade full on phatoos.