Quality of Centuries or Quantity of Centuries?

[babloos]

Re: Quality of Centuries or Quantity of Centuries?

@Captain1

I think Dravid came into pic in mid 90s. Anyways, that was just one name, there were others too. It may have been again media’s fault that they presented Sachin as the only player who would save India but there were many other players too. Look at success % for Dravid and Sachin’s centuries.

Sachin tendulkar has 100 centuries with 53wins and 25 times india has lost ,23 matches drawn

Rahul dravid has 48 centuries with 23 matches won and 8 lost,17 matches drawn

sachin has better win ratio when he has scored an century compare to dravid ,there are so many innings were he scored around 70-90’s runs were india won the match

dravid doesn’t even have the half the numbers,only problem with you guys his everyone points at when sachin fails and dravid performs.

dravid has also failed many times no one points at him ,especially his ODI record isn’t that good he only started playing with better strike rate much later stage in his career.but as a test batsmen i have complete respect for him one of the best player of modern test cricket ,only problem was he was over shadowed by sachin tendulkar who in my opinon was better player of the two

coming to first question,it was around 96-97 dravid and ganguly made debut.
i remeber till 98-99 sachin was the main player,it was around 99 ganguly started playing better in odi dravid in test matches