Re: Quaid-e-Azam who?
^ Get over it. Removal of Jinnah's picture has NOTHING to do with Taliban or maulvis. It's not just Jang who is reporting this.
It has to do with the mentality which results in Taliban.
Jang/Geo/The News initiated this controversy.
If has to do with the mentality which results in Taliban. Jang/Geo/The News initiated this controversy.
Jang is as much reponsible for the murder of Z. Bhutto as JI is .
two gone, two to go…
btw… why is Bilawal being portrayed so much by President Ghaddari… He was even in the senior official meeting with President Obama last month… Amazing.. Bilawal does not hold any govt office in Pakistan and his photos and presence is every where..
Re: Quaid-e-Azam who?
Much fuss has been made in media of Zardari’s alleged removal of Quaid-e-Azam’s portraits form presidential palace.
My own take on this is since when have politicians cared for Quaid-e-Azam and what he stood for? As soon as Quaid was laid to rest so were his ideals of tolerance,…and those who opposed Pakistan’s creation most, also benefited most from Pakistan after its creation (see Irshad Haqani’s column; Nation State or Religious State). So congratulations to Zardari Sahib for being honest for once in his life. We also need to condemn those politicians who have king size portraits of Quaid-e-Azam all over but don’t have any intention of following his ideals.
in a way it a good thing they removed M A Jinah's pic from the president house i.e if they did that,IMO zardari and his minions dont even deserve to sit under the saya of Quaid 3 Azam's picture.
bhutto and his family huh...these people r the biggest corrupt gang in the world..with billions of dollars in bank...bhutto was responsible for dhaka fall..i hope army takes over and kill zardari..
Re: Quaid-e-Azam who?
"i hope army takes over and kill zardari"
ہزاروں خواہشیں ایسی کہ ہر خواہش پہ دم نکلے
"i hope army takes over and **kill **zardari"
ہزاروں خواہشیں ایسی کہ ہر خواہش پہ دم نکلے
Bad post.
"And this has to with not having QA picture on the wall being reported by Jang??" Sure, Taliban and Jamati journalists of Jang follow same mentality. Jang concocted this controversy.
"and Jang does not have to say anything after providing the picture proof and all the talk by govt. " Picture proof is half proof, because the picture does not show the full wall, neither does it show other walls in the room. So if Jang is silent on govt's denial *then you should be silent too. * If Jang or you have any other picture to disprove govt's claim then they should be published too.
"The event had ONLY ONE Picture taken by bad Jang Photographer....LOL"
I didn't say there was only one picture. There must be more pictures, and Jang should release them to prove that govt is wrong. Where are those other pictures?
Truth is that Quaid's picture has NOT been removed from prime minister or president house. There are pictures of various other events happening there, and Quaid's picture is clearly visible in all of them.
However, what is KNOWN is that Taliban's khariji supporters like JUI and Jamat have no respect for the founders of Pakistan, including Quaid e Azam. If people really want to condemn others for disrespect to Quaid, then it should be Jamat and JUI, whose disrespect to Quaid is proven.
Sir, you seem to have problem with reading comprehension.
I am sure Govt. is not so unwelcoming to other journalists or photographers.
And by the way, Earth is round. You know why?
Its indirectly related to taliban!!!
Well, you don't seem to comprehend the difference between "Taliban responsible" and "Talibanic mentality responsible" for Jang's yellow journalism.
That's ok. That is not the crux of argument. No need to discuss that.
But Jang IS now silent after govt's denial and can not disprove its claims.
Can you ask your aaqa daaku ghaddari that where is the darkened area in this picture? You could have come up with some better excuse that this picture was photo shopped. Waisay jiala mentality is worse than Talibanic mentality. Cause jiala mentality is full of corruption, jhoot, blind loyality to dakku group I mean ghaddari group. Talibanic mentality at least has some element of religion in it. Waisay how many bones do you get from your aaqa ghaddari or what are you expecting from him? He will feed his jialas only after he fill up his own bank accounst first and my friend his accounts are very deep. Expect nothing from him…
Can you ask your aaqa daaku ghaddari that where is the darkened area in this picture? You could have come up with some better excuse that this picture was photo shopped. Waisay jiala mentality is worse than Talibanic mentality. Cause jiala mentality is full of corruption, jhoot, blind loyality to dakku group I mean ghaddari group. Talibanic mentality at least has some element of religion in it. Waisay how many bones do you get from your aaqa ghaddari or what are you expecting from him? He will feed his jialas only after he fill up his own bank accounst first and my friend his accounts are very deep. Expect nothing from him...
Hummm... Isn't this whole post off topic?
Re: Quaid-e-Azam who?
^ read my whole post and the quoted part in it. If you are a jiala then its a different thing, and this post may seem totally off topic. But I have questioned where is Quid-e-Azam's picture darkened?
Definitly needs strong comments. all the establishment sitting on us is traitor of this nation who do even not know the meaning of sacrifice. they must be thrown away to their native countries america and india
^ read my whole post and the quoted part in it. If you are a jiala then its a different thing, and this post may seem totally off topic. But I have questioned where is Quid-e-Azam's picture darkened?
You could have asked the question without the additional mumbo jumbo. But even your question had unnecessary addition.
The post was full of emotional ranting or venting.
Re: Quaid-e-Azam who?
I am not a supporter of anybody here. In this thread people are up in arms against each other for a non issue.So let me the voice of reason.
Aiwan a Sadr has hundreds of rooms. Some might have QA's pictures and some might not. Also a room has four walls one wall might have family pictures of Zardaries and Bhuttos and other wall can have pictures of Pakistan's greats like Quid a Azam , Allama Iqbal , Choudhri Rehmat Ali , etc.
I am not a supporter of anybody here. In this thread people are up in arms against each other for a non issue.So let me the voice of reason. Aiwan a Sadr has hundreds of rooms. Some might have QA's pictures and some might not. Also a room has four walls one wall might have family pictures of Zardaries and Bhuttos and other wall can have pictures of Pakistan's greats like Quid a Azam , Allama Iqbal , Choudhri Rehmat Ali , etc.
So am I.
All it needed that govt. published pictures from the walls where QA pictures are still present if they chose to pick a wall with others as backgound.
While Aewane Sadar is a temporary residence of president (at the expense of people's money) , and family pictures could certainly be placed for the duration; the wall chosen for events of any national level should not be the one with pictures of family members.
Definitely other issues were quite irrelevant including 'talibanic mentality' or 'jiyala' ranting.
I am not a supporter of anybody here. In this thread people are up in arms against each other for a non issue.So let me the voice of reason. Aiwan a Sadr has hundreds of rooms. Some might have QA's pictures and some might not. Also a room has four walls one wall might have family pictures of Zardaries and Bhuttos and other wall can have pictures of Pakistan's greats like Quid a Azam , Allama Iqbal , Choudhri Rehmat Ali , etc.
Agree, QA's pic may be very likely on the wall behind President's desk/chair.
Definitly needs strong comments. all the establishment sitting on us is traitor of this nation who do even not know the meaning of sacrifice. they must be thrown away to their native countries america and india
They have 3 members of the same family who did nothing for Pakistan- Bhutto, Bibi bad-tameez and Mr. Ghaddari 10%- At least Supreme court needs to do something about it.. It's sad to see Quaid deserving no place on the wall