Brother, samjha karo. Iftikhar was a crook and a thug from beginning, so most likely he got his birth place Quetta to get jaali domicile of Balochistan, so that he can exploit people of Balochistan, something that is done quite often in Pakistan by people wanting to exploit jobs in other provinces, especially jobs in Sindh and Balochistan. As far as what I am told, Iftikhar family migrated to Baluchistan 30 years ago from Faisalabad, Punjab.
I do not mind if all 4 provinces are open to people from all over Pakistan for jobs, but situation is not like that and there are restrictions in the name of domicile. For instance, I believe that I can compete with anyone from anywhere in Pakistan at all levels for jobs in my field, though I am restricted to jobs in Sindh because of my domicile. In such situation, people moving from one province to another and getting domicile illegally for jobs, plus their friends/relatives helping them to get jobs illegally depriving local population, is wrong, that creates lot of hate in Pakistan between provinces. What I wrote is not ethnic racialism, but living with reality that exists in Pakistan. Either Pakistan Government abolishes domiciles and open every province for all citizen of Pakistan (just like it is in western countries), or stop such movements completely, else we will keep seeing ethnic tensions in Pakistan regularly.
[Personally, I would like to see abolishing of provinces and dividing country into 10 to 15 administrative areas, with complete freedom of population movement, all jobs given on merit without interviews as that can get used for discrimination (maybe 10 percent extra marks for people born within particular administrative area), plus election based on proportional representation].
Anyhow, read this news article, got published in ‘Daily Times’ at the height of ‘Bhangra on road show’, about Iftikhar and his association with Balochistan:
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
Baloch indifference towards CJP’s suspension:
… … … …
Individualland.com, a leading website in the country, earlier held a discussion as to why Balochistan decided to remain calm and neutral over the ongoing crisis. The website quoted former Balochistan Bar Association president Wasey Tareen as saying, “I appreciate the president’s move (of filing a reference) against Justice Chaudhry. This step should have been taken much earlier. He used to act autocratically when he was the chief justice of the Balochistan High Court. He overtly formulated and backed a lobby of privileged lawyers against former Baloch Chief Justice Amir-ul-Mulk Mengal. He was not free in making decisions. He used to take dictations from politicians.”
Tareen said he himself had been sacked from the post of sessions judge in Noshaki district by Justice Chaudhry. “I was then a member of the Pakistan People’s Party and Nawaz Sharif, the former prime minister, dictated Justice Chaudhry to fire me,” he added.
Baloch lawyers in the province are skeptical of Justice Chaudhry. They regret that Justice Chaudhry promoted an anti-Baloch lobby in the provincial judiciary.
“The settlers constitute a minor proportion of Balochistan’s population but they hold 90 percent posts of judges and lawyers in the province. They don’t tolerate the Baloch. Even when 10 Baloch sessions and additional sessions judges were recently inducted, Justice Chaudhry billed it intolerable and demanded an inquiry into the matter by Justice Javed Iqbal and Justice Raja Fayyaz,” alleged Sadiq Raisani, the Baloch Bar Association president.
… … …
Though around 2,000 lawyers are working across Balochistan, hardly more than 50 of them turned up in the protest rallies in support of Justice Chaudhry. An observer said it is unlikely that the CJP will experience a Lahore-like rousing welcome in his home province on his forthcoming trip to Balochistan.
I expected better than this, can you please post a news article instead of posts from other forums?