Proud To be a Pakistani

I’ve paid my dues
Time after time
I’ve done my sentence
But committed no crime
I thank you all
But it’s been no bed of roses
No pleasure cruise
I consider it a challenge before
The whole human race
And I ain’t gonna lose

And we mean to go on and on and on and on

We are the champions - my friends
And we’ll keep on fighting
Till the end
We are the champions
We are the champions
(We are the champions by queen)

http://www.gupistan.com/gallery/1/missilecover2.gif

===============

http://www.gupistan.com/gallery/1/missilecover.gif

[This message has been edited by tipz (edited January 10, 2002).]

I dont get it

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/confused.gif


tum aagyee ho!
noor aagya hay,
challo movie daekhnay chulain :smiley:

Dude its simple.. this is the range of Pakistani nucks. we are gona use them to kick some Indian ass
get it!

whoooowwww, zabardast yar

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

good for us, now up a bit further and towards israel

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/mad2.gif

those are the official projects

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/wink.gif

we r and we (Muslims and Pakis) will be the champions forever InshAllah

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif


~If u think u’r in ma head u’ve been seriously misled~

er, excuse me?

Being a muslim, you cannot use a nuclear weapon. Too many innocent people die.

Actually, Islam allows the death of innocents if it is the only way to accomplish a military objective. If nuclear weapons are required to crush India's economic and industrial infrastructure so as to wreck their ability to wage war (hence accomplishing a military objective), then their use against cities is permitted.

Then what are we waiting for ? hahaha

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

well done ppl.. nice… yeah thats islam :

War, guns, and taliban

keep it up… make allah proud.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

(look up “sarcasm” for those that didnt get it :mad

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

Gamma I think you need to get your head checked out seriously, and get out a bit more. Don’t go around saying stuff when you don’t know about the true Islam.

Hey.... Gamma.....

U ppl.... can stay in ur own little mind...

U guyz just talk bout stuff... without knowing... the right thing......s

U can stay quite..... until u don't know whut u r Saying.....


© ¤ RãJä PãKi§TäNi ²°°² ¤ ©

[quote]
Originally posted by mAd_ScIeNtIsT:
Actually, Islam allows the death of innocents if it is the only way to accomplish a military objective. If nuclear weapons are required to crush India's economic and industrial infrastructure so as to wreck their ability to wage war (hence accomplishing a military objective), then their use against cities is permitted.
[/quote]

Someone please tell me this load of crap isnt true.

GAMMA JEE,
ISLAM GIVE US EVERY RIGHT TO PROTECT OUR SELF FROM THOSE WHO MAKE THREAT TO ISLAM OR YOUR COUNTRY.
IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH ME THEN READ IT YOUR SELF.

[quote]
Originally posted by queer:
**
[QUOTE]
Originally posted by mAd_ScIeNtIsT:
Actually, Islam allows the death of innocents if it is the only way to accomplish a military objective. If nuclear weapons are required to crush India's economic and industrial infrastructure so as to wreck their ability to wage war (hence accomplishing a military objective), then their use against cities is permitted.
[/quote]

Someone please tell me this load of crap isnt true.

**
[/QUOTE]

The scholars have excluded two cases in which the killing of civilians and women is permitted.

The first one is when they take part in the fighting, or if they witness it or are involved in complementary activities such as giving council or propagandizing. The scholars base their decision on the words of the Prophet who, when seeing the slain woman said: "She was not capable of fighting," meaning that had she been fighting, it would have been permitted to kill her.

It should be noted that in the modern age, when an army is engaged in war, non-fighters join it who are involved in complementary activities and, at times, the course of war depends mainly on them. These are, for example, activators of the army's computer systems that direct military activities, such as civilian-manufactured computer systems for directing missiles or sophisticated bombs.

They also include those who work for agencies that carry out military projects; the reserve forces responsible for summoning soldiers and preparing them for fighting, even administratively; intelligence people, and so forth.

All those mentioned fall under the category of those who fight the Muslims and therefore can be targeted and killed in war, especially on occupied Muslim lands such as Palestine.

The second case when the killing of civilians and women is permitted is when Muslims must launch a comprehensive attack against their enemies or shoot them from afar. If civilians, women or children are to be killed in such attacks - although they must not be deliberately targeted - there is no blame on those who kill them, as these things happen in wars when bombs are fired at military posts situated between residential buildings, especially when these are the posts of the occupying army situated on Muslim lands. In such incidents civilians, women, and children are unintentionally killed, but Muslims get killed as well.

As an example, the army of the city of Taif which was hostile to the Prophet (SAWS) fortified itself within the walls of the city. The Muslim Army, led by Khalid Bin Al-Walid (RA) fired catapults into the city with the aim of killing soldiers. However, catapults were inaccurate weapons - whilst they could kill soldiers fortified behind the city walls, they were also likely to miss and land on residences, killing women and children.

However, the Prophet (SAWS) permitted the use of catapults, as civilians we not being intentially targetted - their deaths were a side-effect of killing the enemy soldiers.

Lol guys..

if we Muslims keep going conflicting within our selfs. WE sure cannot fight any WAR ...

just think..

if INDIA, ISRAEL, AMERICA, RUSSIA, Britain. etc dosnt hesitate to kill thousands of Innocent Ppl around the planet. im sure all the above stated countries have been involved in the killings of muslims all over the world.

then should we Muslims just keep our head low. keep on fighting within our selves. and Morover and keep on Conflicting over very CLEAR, SIMPLE, VIGILANT, DESCRIPTIVE, RELEGION ISLAM.

Should we take things taken as grnted , or should read little QURAN, and see what ALLAH ALMIGHTY HAS TO SAY. rather wasting our time in baseless disucssion/argue ??

and sure ALLAH had ordered Muslims to keep themselves for the war. So i strongly support the Nuclear Bombs and Ballistic Missiles preparation. with other hi tech weapons. the only way to defend in modern age.


.::. FlameZz of Love .::.

i agaree with you bismah.. and nice post man..

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

.. unn batoon kay baray main maat kahoo jinn kaa ilam naa hoo..


mairay dill mairay mussafir

Lol guys..

if we Muslims keep going conflicting within our selfs. WE sure cannot

fight any WAR ...

just think..

if INDIA, ISRAEL, AMERICA, RUSSIA, Britain. etc dosnt hesitate to kill

thousands of Innocent Ppl around the planet. im sure all the above

stated countries have been involved in the killings of muslims all over

the world.

then should we Muslims just keep our head low. keep on fighting within

our selves. and Morover and keep on Conflicting over very CLEAR,

SIMPLE, VIGILANT, DESCRIPTIVE, RELEGION ISLAM.

Should we take things taken as grnted , or should read little QURAN,

and see what ALLAH ALMIGHTY HAS TO SAY. rather wasting our time in

baseless disucssion/argue ??

and sure ALLAH had ordered Muslims to keep themselves for the war. So i

strongly support the Nuclear Bombs and Ballistic Missiles preparation.

with other hi tech weapons. the only way to defend in modern age.


.::. FlameZz of Love .::.

[quote]
Originally posted by mAd_ScIeNtIsT:
** However, the Prophet (SAWS) permitted the use of catapults, as civilians we not being intentially targetted - their deaths were a side-effect of killing the enemy soldiers.**
[/quote]

Sounds remarkably similar to US bombs hitting civilian targets in Afghanistan. Somehow no one seemed to think it was right then. Surprising how badly religion can cloud commonsense.

[quote]
Originally posted by mAd_ScIeNtIsT:
*All those mentioned fall under the category of those who fight the Muslims and therefore can be targeted and killed in war, especially on occupied Muslim lands such as Palestine.

*

[/quote]

And this one reminds me of Bush's "Either you are with us, or you are with them".