Never in recent history have so many predictions by neo-con supporters of American military victories, and the superiority of their “beliefs” been proven so wrong.
End of the neo-con dream
The ambitions proclaimed when the neo-cons’ mission statement"The Project for the New American Century" was declared in 1997 have turned into disappointment and recriminations as the crisis in Iraq has grown.
^
u kidding me? wht crimes n wht humanity? the only humanity that exists for USA exists within its borders only, that too is for pure n white americans, rest are all crap…:halo:
death n destruction is all part of USA glory…the more they kill the more they make…its their business and wars make profit for them…:k:
iran is next on its agenda to spread its freedom, democracy, n liberation…
In particular, two leading neo-conservatives, Richard Perle and Kenneth Adelman, attacked the Bush team in Vanity Fair magazine. Both had been on a Pentagon advisory board. Both had argued for war in Iraq. In an article called "Neo Culpa", Richard Perle declared that had he known how it would turn out, he would have been against it: "I think now I probably would have said: 'No, let's consider other strategies'." Kenneth Adelman said: *"They turned out to be among the most incompetent teams in the post-war era. "Not only did each of them, individually, have enormous flaws, but together they were deadly, dysfunctional."** Donald Rumsfeld "fooled me", he said. He declared of neo-conservatism after Iraq: "It's not going to sell."*