Professor vs. student: Discussion on God

[psyah]

Re: Professor vs. student: Discussion on God

@yazdi

Now scientific theories also have a religious orientation.. LOL
Actually we have a lot of almost certain scientific findings which are beyond our five senses.. existence of radio waves.. lights from ultra and infra spectrums to name a few.
You are pretty consistent with terming science as a belief system.. unlike the views of major known and reputed science communities to whom we owe a lot for new discoveries and knowledge. I don’t think your views will find significant science accredition from any serious science scholar.. Some particular type of readers actually get impressed with these views due to your linguistic skills.. The ideas however carry huge bias due to particular religious interpretations you believe..

No yazdi …I do not confuse science for philosophy … This is a philosophy thread … When I say “atheistic driven theories” I mean it in the sense that some scientists are making poor arguments in the philosophical sense because they are working within assumption (parameters) and they have set these parameters to the idea that God does not exist from the onset …

Here look watch this video carefully and then see what I say is true or not.

4 Metaphysics and Epistemology | Marianne Talbot

in fact this video is KEY to finding out why I have my reservations with the Dawkins approach … And many other so called reasons given by atheists (for their insufficiency) in explaining morality … But often their media like taste for purporting unsound arguments … In the formal sense.

Marianne Talbot is a lecturer at Oxford University and I recommend her videos for an essential primer for the undertaking of REAL philosophy.