Probe Rules out Iraq-9/11 Links

It’s not like we needed a panel to tell us this, but it seems the truth is slowly coming out.

So, who was the enemy again? Considering Osama organized the 9/11 attacks, was ‘supposedly’ being funded by the Saudi Royal Family and ‘supposedly’ by some of his own Saudi relatives, why not remove them from power like the ‘allies’ did with Saddam thanks to the ‘supposedly factual’ al-qaeda information that was brought up against him?

The invasion of Iraq can no longer be justified. But I guess that since Saddam is no longer in power, the world should shut and be grateful! Next time, hopefully, the people who were REALLY behind the 9/11 attacks will be targeted. Will the American government take steps to remove the Saudi ruling family from power? I highly doubt it. Who cares about their human rights’ violations as long as they remain bum chums with Bush and Cheney!

Probe rules out Iraq-9/11 links

**The commission investigating the 11 September 2001 attacks on the US has found no “credible evidence” that Iraq helped al-Qaeda carry them out. **

The statement was published before the bipartisan commission began the final two-day public session.

It contradicts Monday’s remarks by the US vice-president about Saddam Hussein “long-established ties” with al-Qaeda.

Iraq’s alleged links with al-Qaeda were part of the justification the Bush administration gave for invading Iraq.

The 11 September attacks killed nearly 3,000 people after members of Osama Bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network flew hijacked planes into New York’s World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

“Al-Qaeda remains extremely interested in conducting chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear attacks,” the preliminary report says.

The point was reinforced by a CIA expert testifying on Wednesday.

“Al-Qaeda… has by no means been defeated and though weakened, it continues to patiently plan its next attacks,” said the expert, identified as Dr K.

“They may strike next week, next month or next year but they will strike,” he warned.

A final report on the commission’s findings is due on 28 July.

But preliminary statements published by the commission on a range of issues are building up into a complex picture of missed opportunities and some of it does not make pleasant reading for the Bush administration, says BBC diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus.

**Bin Laden spurned **

The statement entitled Overview of the Enemy has been prepared by commission staff and contains “initial findings to present to the public on the nature of the enemy that carried out the 11 September attacks”.

Outlining the roots of al-Qaeda and its activities, it said Osama Bin Laden had explored the possibility of co-operation with Iraq, despite his opposition to Saddam Hussein’s secular regime.

It said a senior Iraqi intelligence officer had met Bin Laden in 1994 to hear his requests for space to establish training camps and assistance in procuring weapons.

“There have been reports that contacts between Iraq and al-Qaeda also occurred after Bin Laden had returned to Afghanistan, but they do not appear to have resulted in a collaborative relationship,” the statement says.

It adds: "Two senior Bin Laden associates have adamantly denied that any ties existed between al-Qaeda and Iraq.

“We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al-Qaeda co-operated on attacks against the United States.”

But it concludes that al-Qaeda remains a threat as it attempts to launch “chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear attacks”.

“Regardless of the tactic, al-Qaeda is actively striving to attack the United States and inflict mass casualties,” the reports ends.

**Report’s other findings: **

Bin Laden did not fund al-Qaeda through a personal fortune - it relied on a fundraising network.

There is no convincing evidence that any government financially supported al-Qaeda before the 11 September attacks.

The 1998 attacks on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania “were planned, directed, and executed by al-Qaeda, under the direct supervision of Bin Laden and his chief aides”.

Al-Qaeda is “far more decentralised”, now that Bin Laden has lost his Afghan base.

Closing circle

This is the 12th time the commission has heard from witnesses in public.

The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States said Wednesday’s session would hear from several of the federal government’s top law enforcement and intelligence experts on al-Qaeda and the 11 September plot.

On Thursday, top military and civilian aviation officials - including General Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - will testify about their agencies’ responses to the attacks.

“The commission has to ask some important questions about that day,” said vice-chairman Lee Hamilton.

Among some of the commission’s preliminary findings, is a report that the hijackers may have planned their attack for some months earlier than September, but postponed it after one of them was unable to take part.

I am not so sure why there was a need for a commission to probe ... it was crystal clear. DUH

Well now maybe all those Americans who I've seen on talk shows like Dr. Phil who raise their hands when asked if they believe that Saddam had something to do with 9/11 will actually start using their heads and think for themselves instead of blindly believing everything the media feeds them.

What makes you think that the Commission’s findings are accurate?

The evidence that was raised against Iraq's involvement with Al-Qaeda was heresay, if not lies. Of course, people will argue that those who were interviewed by the panel who claim there were no solid ties between Osama and Saddam could be lying.

At least questions are being asked and hopefully, the Bush administration will be held accountable. Dropping bombs on another country is no small matter. I'm glad the panel is looking into it.

Well it is good that we invaded Iraq. I have’t heard a peep from the Syrians, Libya is coming around. Iran will follow suit and then the chinese will take care of N Korea. It is related to 9/11. Wasn;t saddam payingoff suicide bombers who killed ISraelis. He will not be doing that anymore…good job, USA!!! :k:

You just a silly woman. What d'ya know 'bout nuthin?

Now, looky here. We all know who was really behind the September the Eleven. And, y'see, we's gonna git around to them fellas in funny clothes over there in Saudy Arabian. The thing is, we can't just smack 'em around no matter how fun it'd be. That's were the genie.. gen.. smartfulness of attacking Iraq comes up.

Y'see, we really do want to kill off all them damn Chinamen--er, I mean, Saudis. But if we did that then who in the hell would pay my daddy and Mr Cheney and everyone else. American will starve! So, anyhow, the point is, what I was going to say, you could say, or I could, the point is.. if we attack Iraq, then we can "punk out" [wait for smirk] the Saudi-folk. It would make them wet their towels! or rags.. what the hell do you call them things? But by attacking Iraq we will be able to bring democracy to the entire Middle East region. Once democracy gets around to Saudi Arabia the people of Saudi Arabia will be thankful, as the people of Iraq already are. And the people of Saudi Arabia will be grateful for what the people of America did to liberate them from a dictator ship that was running rape rooms and torturing children.

The only problem with all what I just said is that the dirty libruls done messed it up by wishing that we fail in Iraq. So now that they done messed that up and made us waste all our time there we can't afford to attack the people who were really behind 9/11: Brazil.

God Bless America. And no one else.

-- W.

ps.. hehe, I was just kidding about that part about Brazil. I saw this website last night and gee-wiz.. them girlies are fine!! I wouldn't mind invading Brazil. But don't y'all worry, I know Tibet was really behind it. That llama guy gives me the creepies too.

Sorry, Mehnaz :flower1: I just can’t be serious about this stuff anymore. The fact that people can still argue the basic truths we have in all this gives me a friggin aneurysm.

How can we let a Vice President get away with spouting such BS as little as a few days ago? Absurdity, I tell ya.

Matsui, how often did you ever hear the suicide bomber reference before the war as a selling point? Usually it was simply left at “supports terrorism” as a different piece in addition to the ramblings on aQ and Ansar. Why would the wiser proponents of the war be shy about mentioning Saddam’s meager funding of those lame jihadis? Could it be that KSA outspent him in funding and support by far? I guess that just brings us back to Mehnaz’s question: Why haven’t we hurt the KSA yet?

I am with ya buddy. I think the whole region needs a good foot in the ole ass.

Sure, but I thought W was a visionary leader who acts on principles and what is right, not the opinions of some whiners?

“And I am an optimistic person. I guess if you want to try to find something to be pessimistic about, you can find it, no matter how hard you look, you know?” – W.

:rolleyes:

:wink:

The links and roots to 9/11, terrorism and the use of radical Islam as a tool for murder, chaos and mayhem can all be found in KSA. But I have a feeling that if US invaded KSA, there would be more bitching and moaning about the occupation of the land of the holy places than accusations about oil.

SEPTEMBER 11TH one of the biggest conspiracies muslims have had to face, led by amreeka and israel. this point has been argued over and over and over and over AGAIN!!! we all know it was a big conspiracy by bush and co’ let’s leave iraq, afgahnistan, ksa or even pakistan out of this propoganda.

tyrant leaders like monkey bush and helium bomb sharon will :insha: ]go to hell and rot their for lying and turning the majority of the world against muslims…

amreeka is the root of dehshatgardi, amreeka financed and backed saddam during the iraq-iran civil war, when it saw saddam as a perfect mohra who could 1 day :help: ] amreeka control the middle-east.

amreeka’s own criminal intelligance agency trained the like’s of osama jo khud un pai bharey parhaa tha when he found out wat their asli intentions were.

amreeka financed and backed israel during the israel-arab war of 1948-49, where was israel b4 1948??? now suddenly the jewish majority claim it is their promised land??? amreeka is resposible 4 much much more but the western media and the chamchai of amreeka hide the facts nd the truth which harm’s them but know’s exactly how to spread propoganda and the perfect example is the intentional ridiculing of islam throughout the world.

:insha: ] allah kai karam sai yai kuffar apnai najaiz aur napaak iraadoun mai kabhi bhe kamiyaab nahin houn gai.

LUC, kindly stick to the topic. My question was, why is the Saudia Royal Family still in power? If you can answer this question without going on a tangent, that would be great.

Reasons for Royal Family still being in power:

  1. That's what Israel wants, therefore it's what the US wants, so the Royal Family can continue their extravagant ways. That way no danger of so called fundamentalists taking over.

  2. Oil. America takes it. Royal family provides it.

  3. Sadly most the of the Saudi people are totally uneducated or poor to do anything about the heinous actions of the Royal Family. The rest are too rich to care.

Re: Probe Rules out Iraq-9/11 Links

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by MehnazQ: * So, who was the enemy again? Considering Osama organized the 9/11 attacks, was 'supposedly' being funded by the Saudi Royal Family and 'supposedly' by some of his own Saudi relatives, why not remove them from power like the 'allies' did with Saddam thanks to the 'supposedly factual' al-qaeda information that was brought up against him?
[/QUOTE]

Well the Saudi Ruling Family is also blood related to alot of the rulers in the US.

Bush Disputes al Qaida- Saddam Conclusion](Yahoo News: Latest and Breaking News, Headlines, Live Updates, and More)

“There was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida,” Bush insisted following a meeting with his Cabinet at the White House.

“This administration never said that the 9-11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al-Qaida,” he said.

“We did say there were numerous contacts between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida, for example, Iraqi intelligence agents met with (Osama) bin Laden, the head of al-Qaida in the Sudan.”
I think it’s safe to simply call him a dumbass now, no?

By his logic Peter Bergen is the evil liason for that infamous terroristic agency hellbent on world domination and indoctrination with corrupt, liberal values, CNN.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by spoon: * I think it's safe to simply call him a dumbass now, no?
[/QUOTE]

He's the modern day President Boris Yeltsin.

Saddam Predicted bin Laden’s 9/11 Attack

ye saray loag aik doosray se pooch ker kaam kertay hain kiya
har kisse ki game ka doosray bohat se logoon ko patta hootahay
i have read in another article that there r only two ppl in pakistan who exactly know where Osama Bin Laden is ?? the one is Musharraf and the other is the DG ISI
all of the politics going around the world is a game of chess where every body keeps an eye on other’s moves , survival of the fastest
i like it

…In fact, some of the most compelling evidence of a link comes from Saddam
Hussein himself, who warned before 9/11 in official government publications
that bin Laden would carry out a devastating attack against America - and
then effusively praised the 9/11 mastermind after the attacks.

Full Storyhttp://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/6/17/85557.shtml