Powell Says U.S. Has 45-Nation Coalition on Iraq

**Middle World Dwarves Join War on Iraq **

Washington, D.C. - After the New York Times reported last week a substantial spike in the sale of battle axes, Broken Newz has learned that the Dwarves of Middle Earth have joined America, Britain, Spain and Australia in the War on Iraq.

Elements from the 101st Airborne Dwarf Battalion, “The Screaming Gimlis,” are slated to parachute into Baghdad and hack to death prominent members of the Ba’ath Party as well as the family of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

I think I heard Bush say 30 nations last night.. did some drop out at the last moment??

No, PA, Zaire was counted twice, once as Belgian Congo. Mistakes happen, it is a time of war, for everyone (Democrates and Liberals) to come together.

Here is the the list of US Coalition of the Willing !! :rolleyes:

This is what i think of ‘coalition of the willing’.. its kind of like saying.. ohioguy or his *&^%$# president goes out and hires a few thugs to rob a bank.. well even though rest of world (including masses of american.. but who gives a crap about them since we are in a ‘democracy’) strongly disagree with him, he will still do it since its a matter of his ‘resolve/freedom/way of life’ blah blah..well they have a ‘coalition of the willing’ (every one gets a share of the loot)..

:o

Have you seen the list?

Talk about clutching at straws.

John Travolta in 'Swordfish' had more clout than all these countries put together!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ohioguy: *
"Spain, Turkey, Pakistan all been offered AID in billions"

Did you learn nothing from Nancy Reagan? Just say no!
[/QUOTE]

She knew of other resources as well, and they are far more money donators, you know more than me.

**Get Out Your Checkbook **](Get Out Your Checkbook)

Michael Freedman, 03.20.03, 12:00 PM ET

NEW YORK - The 34 nations publicly backing the U.S. campaign in Iraq may truly believe Saddam Hussein is a tyrant who must go. They also know who helps pay the bills.

Twenty-four of those countries, including Macedonia, Eritrea and Nicaragua, are slated to receive direct financial assistance from the U.S. in 2004 (see table, below). Yet some of the leading recipients of U.S. foreign aid have failed to publicly back the campaign. The Bush Administration has requested $1.9 billion for Egypt in 2003, making it the second-largest recipient of foreign aid. But Egypt has never publicly backed the war and it is unclear what, if any, role the nation will play in Iraq. Still, it is asking for more money. Russia, which threatened to veto a U.N. resolution backing the use of force, could receive as much as $158 million in 2003.

The Bush Administration is expected to ask for supplemental foreign aid within the next two weeks. Lawmakers responsible for doling out foreign aid are likely to remember which countries showed support for the U.S., says Scott Lasensky, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York who is writing a book on American foreign aid. The longer Turkey sits on the fence, for example, the greater risk to its aid.

The Cost Of Conflict

Country U.S. Foreign Aid Appropriations, Fiscal 2004* ($mil)


 
Afghanistan  $550  
Albania  34.9  
Australia  0  
Azerbaijan  49.6  
Bulgaria  41.5  
Colombia  574.6  
Czech Republic  11.9  
Denmark  0  
El Salvador  41.1  
Eritrea  8.2  
Estonia  9.2  
Ethiopia  58.9  
Georgia  89.9  
Honduras  41.0  
Hungary  11.9  
Iceland  0  
Italy  0  
Japan  0  
Korea  0  
Latvia  9.3  
Lithuania  10  
Macedonia  51.4  
Netherlands  0  
Nicaragua  35.4  
Philippines  89.7  
Poland  14  
Portugal  0.9  
Romania  43.5  
Singapore  0  
Slovakia  9.3  
Spain  0  
Turkey  255.6  
United Kingdom  0  
Uzbekistan  57.5  

*Pending Congressional approval. Source: U.S. Agency for International Development

Nations that play significant roles in the war will be remembered, too, though. Jordan, which has played a quiet role, could be a big beneficiary, as could Israel, a nation that already tops the list of U.S. foreign aid at $2.7 billion. Other nations that help in the reconstruction of Iraq may also benefit.

Still, diplomats must remember to avoid the appearance of checkbook diplomacy. So far the Bush Administration, as well as countries like Turkey, have handled the issue crudely, Lasensky says, making the quid pro quo between money and support too obvious. “Aid, like diplomacy itself,” he observes, “is a delicate instrument.”

How come Israel is not a part of “Coalition of the Willing”?

I am shocked!

The majority of the worlds nations including the regional powers France, Germany and China have strongly condemned Bushs illegal war against Iraq.

Iraq: Russia, China Lead Criticism Of U.S. Attack](http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2003/03/20032003173433.asp) Radio Free Europe

Russia, China, France, and Germany – countries all strongly opposed to military action in Iraq – led a chorus of voices today condemning the U.S. missile attack on Baghdad. Expressions of criticism and concern were heard in many places around the world – from the European Union to New Zealand. ..

Re: 45 Nations Back The United States Against Iraq

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
Not so alone afterall....

Big deal, all they are is a list of names. Only two countries are sending troops: Britain and perhaps Australia.

Not to mention it is only the governments that are on Bush's side. The majority of the people on this Earth are against this invasion.

In spite of what the polls say in the United States say, I also think most here are against it. It is not that hard to make polls reflect what you want them to. Simply ask in areas of the country that are more likely historicaly to go along with war. I live in a city of a million people and do not know one person that is in favor of this planned mass murder.

To be sure Saddam is one of the worst excuses for a human being that has ever dared to take a breath, but in this case he has done nothing to deserve to have his country invaded.

I just can not help but wonder what this will lead to.

Bush knew even before he said the words, that Saddam would never leave Iraq of his own free will.

Any monkeys in the Coalition of the Willing?

White House Notebook: Many Willing, But Few Are Able, Dana Milbank, Washington Post, 25 March 2003

…] After initially including Angola in the coalition of the willing last week, the White House removed the country without explanation, as first noted by Agence France-Presse. Angolan embassy officials didn’t respond yesterday to phone calls. With luck, Angola can be replaced by Morocco, if a report yesterday by UPI is to be believed. According to the wire service, Morocco’s weekly al Usbu’ al-Siyassi claimed that Morocco has offered 2,000 monkeys to help detonate land mines.

An official at the Moroccan Embassy could not confirm the presence of monkeys in the coalition of the willing.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *
Any monkeys in the Coalition of the Willing?

An official at the Moroccan Embassy could not confirm the presence of monkeys in the coalition of the willing.
[/QUOTE]

:-)
laughable stuff :-)

btw they also have a monkey in the white house :-)

Lemme add to this that since yesterday 9 Nations of this "coalition" have suddenly become a part of NATO and soon they will be part of the EU......how come?!
Interesting isnt it?