Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
A confession is a confession, and nothing else, certainly not "bull crap"! And using multi nicks doesnt help either ;)
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
A confession is a confession, and nothing else, certainly not "bull crap"! And using multi nicks doesnt help either ;)
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
President Musharraf in his address to the UN Assembly in 2002 or 2003 specifically mentioned the genocide in Gujrat, and spared no words in attacking the culprits behind it. Moreover, he also raised his concerns (in some pretty strong language) about the general apathy and lack of media focus towards that incident. This pissed off the Indians to no end, as UN is really the ultimate place to voice out your stance.
Musharraf's highlighting of the Gujarat genocide has at least resulted in Modi being refused entry by the west. But it is India that needs to do more to bring this man and his associates to justice.
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
Show me a muslim country which is secular. Its Oxymoron to say so. If a christian comes and says something out here against India I can understand. But majority of them never say anything like that. Let the Pope say whatever he wants. Did Bush stop going into Iraq just because Pope said no. Thats how a born again christian takes the Pope's words, and u are talking about India. In India can there be only protest for banning Da vinci code.
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
It's an oxymoron to state that India is secular after what happened to Muslims in Gujarat, and the people who carried that genocide out are elected back to power by Hindu's.
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
Let the world decide buddy. Ask a american, european or a korean and all we say that India is more secular than all the islamic country put together.
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
American's and European's will not let the likes of Modi into their countries, and we should be asking the Muslim survivors of the Gujarat massacres how secular India really is.
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India’s Gujarat state
How convenient. Drag the rest of the world in when the Indos themselves fail to stand up to the plate for their country’s awful deeds. ![]()
PS: It was America which banned Modi from entering US and meted out the same treatment which they give to the North Koreans, Iranians etc. Convenient amnesia, anyone?
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
So u say america is very secular. IS that what u say..:). I dont know about that but I heard , anybody resembling a typical muslim definition are searched and humuliated. I thought Bush is the president who were on a crusade against Muslims.
I dont have respect for Bush or Modi. Both are dump asses. But I find it very funny inorder to win an argument u can a make a messiah out of George w bush.:).
Its u guys who have selective amnesia. Does some of the european countries ban head scarf. Is that not the european countries who made the cartoon.
I would be asking u why u r letting Bush and other commies come into ur islamic country when they are verging war against Islam.(according to u).
So beta, selective reporting is not going to win an argument here.
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
^ Ghussa na kar na bhai. Araam sey
Using bad language will only hurt us
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
I think you should relook at definitions of Secularism and Democracy. Since you are cut and paste king. Can you find them and cut and paste them here.......
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
It is Indian's who said that the west saw India as a secular state not me. If that is so, then why have they refused Modi into their countries? As long as Modi is around and allowed to govern after his role in the Gujarat masscare of Muslims, then you cannot claim you are secular.
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
Ok, Modi isn't India. He is part of India......
I don't call Imam Bukhari Secular - He is part of India
I don't call Mulayam Singh Secular - He is part of India with balatant Muslim appeasement agenda
I don't call Ramvilas Paswan Secular - He said that he will only support a Muslim chief minister for Bihar......
I don't call Kashmiri Muslims Secular after they have allowed the cleanesing of Pandits..
Though when you mix all this you come with a good Secular mix.......
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
^
Clever play on words, but when your own Indian government still maintains relations with a Muslim-hater like Modi then they cannot call themselves secular.
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
^ yes indian government has to maintain relations with modi..out of compulsion. Central government is left with no choice but to keep relations with elected assemblies. You think congress will maintain relations with BJP. definitely not.
and you clever to twist everything...if not here in other areas. You did that in "worst violators of religious freedom" thread. you twisted your own constitution by the way there.
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India's Gujarat state
U didnt get the drift did u. U take out Modi in whole of India and his rejection of the american visa as a proof that India is percieved as non secular by the western countries. Well I can as well take out some deeds and laws in these secular states ( which i believe strongly they are ) and paste it up here to proove my point that these countries are also non secular.
:)
Re: Police shoot Muslim protesters in India’s Gujarat state
you really don’t get it… ![]()
Doesn’t Indian government keep relation with all the people mentioned above as well.. INfact Paswan a cabinet minister… in current govt… ![]()
Tu bhee na…