With no Shanatee card or SS No India Randomly dispenses its citizenship to long gone NRI either b/c they are hindu or Money
http://www.countercurrents.org/hr-dayal.htm
Plastic Identity: Dividing line between
Chosen People and Illegal Aliens
By John Dayal
In the second week of New Year 2003 was marked by a series of
apparently unconnected events:
-
Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee told a 1,500 strong
gathering of top international leaders of the estimated 2 crore
Indian ethnic origin that Pravasi Bharatiyas, or NRIs, from select
countries such as the US and the UK could get double citizenship on a reciprocal basis -
Deputy prime minister Lal Krishna Advani, announcing a
scheme for a proposed multi-purpose national identity card, said
about 12,000 Pakistanis staying illegally in India after the expiry
of their visas an estimated 1.5 crore Bangladeshis would be expelled, a programme enthusiastically echoed by the Lt Governor of Delhi which arguably has the second largest such population after Assam -
India `tested’ one more version of its Agni mid range ballistic missile which puts all of Pakistan, and Bangladesh, within
strike range – the missile can, of course, carry the much wonted
nuclear war head for which a new command system has now been put in
place. -
A growth rate of over 8 per cent has been envisaged, some
of it expectedly from large scale Foreign direct investment -
In all innocence, Vajpayee asks Indians, including NRIs, to
help un tarnish India’s image abroad, even as the government cancels passports of top Kashmiri leaders it holds guilty of tarnishing the Indian image by telling the world what is happening in Kashmir and in Gujarat for that matter.
The men who wrote the Prime Minister’s Musings from Goa, and the men who interlocute for him in talks with the US government, among the elite band of thinkers in the NDA government and the Bharatiya Janata party, have unanimously reached the decision that this is the right time for India to launch a major Public relations Exercise abroad, harnessing whatever energies it can from resident and no resident Indians, from the emerging Hindutva in the expatriate populations in the US and the UK, and above all, when the western governments are still on the cusp of the anti-Islamic hate wave following the World Trade Centre terror and before it calms down to an oil dictated détente with the Gulf region once again.
Top of the mind also is the need to clear up the public relations
disaster that Gujarat was, as government thinkers put it in mild
terms, and yet retain some steam for the `Secularism versus Security" debate on which the BJP hopes to ride the election campaign later this year for half a dozen state assemblies, hoping to repeat in Rajasthan and elsewhere the black miracle it did in Gujarat.
So what is wrong with either the grant of citizen status to people of Indian origin, or with kicking out people who definitely are aliens and are living - for good or for bad - as any other citizen in the metropolitan towns and qasbas of most of north India? Is there any breach of international protocols in chucking out Bangladeshis?
The problem with both issues is not the law, but the morality. The
NDA government - and perhaps it is time to call it the BJP government on these issues - is pandering to lobbies whose intention is to subserve the agenda of the Sangh parivar, and not the nation at large.
Prof Amartya Sen and several prominent NRIs from the United Kingdom in fact pointed out directly to Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee that the nation has to make up its mind as to what sort of an image it wants to project. It will not do, they said, for India to account for itself as an exclusive land, fit in the sciences and first in culture, without acknowledging that its civilisation has gained
tremendously in millennia of give and take with other peoples and
other civilisations, including the now hated western civilisation.
Indian claims in mathematics ring true only in acknowledging the
contribution of Arabian sciences and western thought, as much as even its Sanskrit language cannot be kept exclusive as something born in India and not brought from Outside.
These savants among the NRIs want an image of India that obeys the rules of civilisation, the rules of law, of plurality of culture, of
the fact that for over 2,000 years, various religions and ethnic
groups , hundreds of language segments and social mores have co existed and interacted, each strengthening the other, even if
occasional syncretism gave way to temporary absorption. An India where man had, and has, dignity.
It is in this context that thinkers reject both the Israeli model of
Diaspora and the Chinese emotionalism and loyalty as universally
valid for the type of Diaspora that Indians are.
The Israeli Diaspora, and the Israeli pattern of dual citizenship
accord between Washington and Tel Aviv - a great favourite of Home minister Lal Krishna Advani - is fed on centuries of history of paranoia and persecution in Europe, culminating in the Holocaust in which Nazis, another favourite of Advani, sent over 6 million Jews to the gas chambers or forced labour camps. The birth of Zionism, the forced birth of an Israeli state and the Law of return, weave a complicated web of loyalty, compassion and attraction that binds conservative Jews and modern New Yorkers with first generation refugees from Eastern Europe still speaking the Yiddish of the Polish Ghetto. Israel and New York, if not Washington, merge seamlessly as it were where the interests of Israel and the self interest of the ruling regime in Wall Street and Washington is concerned. The flow of money, the flow of arms, and the diplomatic turning of the blind eye to Israeli nuclear ambitions or its terrible human rights record, are all part of the package which modern day Israel has been able to wrest out of a west which wants a foothold on the shores of the oil rich Western Asian region, and also suffers from a colossal guilt complex for the anti Semitism of two thousand years, which still breaks through every so often in real life to send law makers rushing
into another sop for Tel Aviv.
The Chinese Diaspora is more complex - generations of movements that colonised South east Asia to emerge as the main ethnic group as in Singapore, and generations of migrants to the west who emerged from their ghettos as an industrious people with strong emotional ethnic identity and ties which a monolithic cultural commonality and a unique and exclusive language – despite its variations such as Cantonese and the classical Mandarin - which allowed them to live in powerful cultural cocoons which outlasted the initial reasons for which they had left the home land - for work, or fleeing communist action or whatever. The Chinese of the first regeneration have send money home, and during the long cold years of the Maoist and Cultural
Revolution days, they patronised the many democratic and market movements in the main land. It needs to be remembered that despite he strong political animosity that Hong Kong and mainland once had, and which Taiwan still has towards Beijing, there are strong ethnic and cultural ties that bind the one common Chinese people. But even in the Chinese model of Diaspora, it is the first generation that has an economic interest in the Mainland, even if it has no desire to settle down there. The astute Chinese mind - which invented the bureaucracy five thousand years ago -sees the homeland as a good investment because their understanding of its potential and their faith in the industry of their own people, who like themselves, want to reach out for the sky. The Chinese have a time conception which spans centuries, and the pace of events is never forced. The Chinese, as India knows to it cost have inordinate patience and a cohesiveness which India cannot match.
The Indian Diaspora share a little with the Chinese in as far as the
forced movement of citizens during the British regime is concerned. The Indian Diaspora is multi layered, and each layer responds in its own unique way, with little in common with other NRIs conglomerations.
The first possibly is the natural migrants from South India whose
boats took them all the way to South east and perhaps even to the
Pacific Rim. The Tamil and Indian heritage in these areas exists,
but the people have little interest in India other than that of a
cultural curiosity. It is too far back in time. Even closer in time,
the Tamils of Sri Lanka, whether they are indigenous, or plantation labour or even more recent migrants of the twentieth century, maintain a close relationship of culture with Tamil Nadu, which for them is all that is India, but neither the government nor social movements have ever thought of them ad part of the Diaspora that is to be wooed. Among other things, they are non sanskritised, anti Brahmanical, and poor. And the Tamil Tigers, at present, are militant and remember not the Indian help to them but the hurt and injury that the Indian army incited on them during the days of Rajiv Gandhi and the Indian peace Keeping Force. Tamils in Sri Lanka also do not forget that India helps the Military whenever the chips are down though its diplomacy I apparently geared towards the Tamils. India loses out either way for the ham handed ness of its relationship with this large volume of men and women so patently of Indian origin.