Yes a companion who split the Ummah led a civil war which killed many Muslims uncluding other companions and changed a Khilfat of qiyas and Ijma into a Kingdom. His military and political achievements were many but why defend the indefensible?
Yes a companion who split the Ummah led a civil war which killed many Muslims uncluding other companions and changed a Khilfat of qiyas and Ijma into a Kingdom. His military and political achievements were many but why defend the indefensible?