Name of People who should be named accessary to murder of BB.
Talat of Aaj.tv
Kahsif Abbasi of Aryoneworld
Hamid Mir of capital talk
Shahid Maqsood of meray mutabiq
And here is the reason.
NRO is withdrawal of cases. Not pardon. Procecutor has a right to writhdraw any case he wants.
These Anchor announced that their was a deal between BB and Mush but they have showed no evidence. They have not shown documents regarding the deal.
What was their source that deal was reached were they feed by the establishment what agency gave the tips and to what end.
They created and envoirment right was killing of BB.
^ Incorrect. NRO also resulted in crimes of Nawaz Sharif being withdrawn. Musharraf did meet BB outside Pakistan, what do you think he visited her? Just to ask "how are you madam?"?
^ Incorrect. NRO also resulted in crimes of Nawaz Sharif being withdrawn. Musharraf did meet BB outside Pakistan, what do you think he visited her? Just to ask "how are you madam?"?
Incorrect. Nawaz was already convicted in that place hijack case. The NRO pertained to the PPP and MQM, who had tonnes of cases pending against them.
That is correct MQM was the major benficiery of the NRO. But my question is how this anchors knew that their was deal between BB and Mush. Why such a hype was created on the deal. Which we even today do not know wheter deal was made or not.
Changez, there were no cases pending against him. If you think there are, please post some proof. If you want, you can dig up the NRO Benefactor's thread someone posted here on GS. NRO was basically tailor made for Zardari and some MQM crooks (so they could come back to Pakistan).
Changez, there were no cases pending against him. If you think there are, please post some proof. If you want, you can dig up the NRO Benefactor's thread someone posted here on GS. NRO was basically tailor made for Zardari and some MQM crooks (so they could come back to Pakistan).
Prosecutor has the right to withdraw the cases. the question is why it become necessary to issue ordinance. Ordinance did not gave the pardon to Zardari. Case were withdraw that mean govenment accept that their were no cases.
Prosecutor has the right to withdraw the cases. the question is why it become necessary to issue ordinance. Ordinance did not gave the pardon to Zardari. Case were withdraw that mean govenment accept that their were no cases.
Not really, the cases were withdrawn with rationale that all "politically motivated" cases will be removed but that was just a cover to remove all the criminal cases against anyone prior to the plane-hijack (against NS) date.
Not really, the cases were withdrawn with rationale that all "politically motivated" cases will be removed but that was just a cover to remove all the criminal cases against anyone prior to the plane-hijack (against NS) date.
Chngez, I am not question the motive behind the order my question is why issue the ordenance when same result could have been achived by prosecutor.
And my topic question is why the Anchors created a hype of the document (DEAL) when document is none exitence.
Please go into history, West decieded not to allow to any Muslim leader to be famous when they saw Bhutto,Shah Faisal,Qaddafi,Eidi Amin and others becomming popular leaders.And result was Muslim Unity.See the result of all in 1973 Islamic Summit's **leaders,Every one of them was pushed to death or to be thrown away from power.They dont allow Muslim leasdrs to live.They need only puppets like **Zia ,Yahya or Musharraf.
Please go into history, West decieded not to allow to any Muslim leader to be famous when they saw Bhutto,Shah Faisal,Qaddafi,Eidi Amin and others becomming popular leaders.And result was Muslim Unity.See the result of all in 1973 Islamic Summit's **leaders,Every one of them was pushed to death or to be thrown away from power.They dont allow Muslim leasdrs to live.They need only puppets like **Zia ,Yahya or Musharraf.
So west will have a problem if a 'Muslim' leader becomes "famous"? haha. Is Qaddafi still not a "leader"?
The question is why they (anchors) lied. I agreed they hate musharraf but by lieying they damanged BB more than Mush.
They did not lie, there were many reports about the deal Musharraf and BB reached at one point, the NRO was then touted to be result of the same by everyone.
Changez, since you failed provide evidence as to how the NRO benefitted Nawaz Sharif, here you go. Please next time do your reading.
Vittorio Hernandez - AHN News Writer
Islamabad, Pakistan (AHN) - On the eve of Pakistan’s Saturday national election, sitting President General Pervez Musharraf - running for reelection - signed a National Reconciliation Ordinance that may ensure his victory at the polls. **The ordinance drops corruption charges against ex-Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, but does not offer amnesty to Musharraf’s predecessor Nawaz Sharif. **
The dropping of charges against Bhutto is a prelude to a power-sharing deal between her and Musharraf. Aside from settling their differences, the move seeks to bring credibility to Musharraf’s government, swept to power by a bloodless coup against Sharif in 1999. Bhutto’s Pakistan People’s party is the biggest in the nation.
**Covered by the ordinance are persons accused for political reasons, but not convicted yet by a trial court. It has a time prescription - from January 1986 to October 12, 1999. Sharif’s cases were filed in 2000, providing a legal loophole for his exclusion in the reconciliation program. **Charges against him, filed with Pakistan’s Anti-Terrorism Courts include corruption, hijacking, tax evasion, embezzlement and terrorism.
Even though Pakistanis head to the polls on Saturday, the winner cannot be declared until the Supreme Court decides on the legality of President Musharraf’s reelection attempt. On Friday, the High Court said it is bidding for more time to study legal challenges lodged by Musharraf’s rivals. The court earlier threw out petitions filed by the general’s opponents, but pleadings were refiled this week. The general’s lawyers said he will only give up his Army post if he wins the presidential election anew.
Changez, since you failed provide evidence as to how the NRO benefitted Nawaz Sharif, here you go. Please next time do your reading.
Read your own source again my friend:
**Covered by the ordinance are persons accused for political reasons, but not convicted yet by a trial court. It has a time prescription - from January 1986 to October 12, 1999. Sharif's cases were filed in 2000, providing a legal loophole for his exclusion in the reconciliation program. **Charges against him, filed with Pakistan's Anti-Terrorism Courts include corruption, hijacking, tax evasion, embezzlement and terrorism.
This article is referring to cases filed against Nawaz Sharif post Musharraf coup.
They did not lie, there were many reports about the deal Musharraf and BB reached at one point, the NRO was then touted to be result of the same by everyone.
“Last week, she confirmed that the PPP was in negotiations with supporters of Gen Pervez Musharraf to secure free elections to the National Assembly and to reach an understanding on how the two leaders would work together if she won.”*