Voting going on, on CNN regarding Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
Please Go to http://edition.cnn.com/ and scroll down to the end at right cover u ll see a vote going on. and vote “NO” !
Spread the word..
I feel we need to take active part in polls like these to prove them wrong at every point … please do vote ..
‘Do you defend the decision to publish images of the Prophet Mohammed?’ The questions about defending and not agreeing. Shouldn’t we vote for a ‘YES’ ?
defend ka meaning to bachana and hifazat karna hai ? please correct me if i am wrong … confuseeddd
If you defend something that means you agree with it. So if you defend the publication of the cartoons its because you agree that they should be publicized. Yes, the wording is really confusing.
If you defend something that means you agree with it. So if you defend the publication of the cartoons its because you agree that they should be publicized. Yes, the wording is really confusing.
Not really. One can defend the right to publish without agreeing with what is being published.
Not really. One can defend the right to publish without agreeing with what is being published.
I was explaining according to the question asked. I did not mention anything about agreement or disagreement to the content. I said if you defend the publication as asked in the poll it means you agree to let it be publicised. No where did I say it also means you agree with the message.
Although personally I would not defend to have something publicized if I did NOT agree with its message. That to me is contradicting. Also, if you don't agree with my opinion thats fine but do not tell me my opinion is wrong or worse then yours or someone else's, thanks.
I was explaining according to the question asked. I did not mention anything about agreement or disagreement to the content. I said if you defend the publication as asked in the poll it means you agree to let it be publicised. No where did I say it also means you agree with the message.
Although personally I would not defend to have something publicized if I did NOT agree with its message. That to me is contradicting. Also, if you don't agree with my opinion thats fine but do not tell me my opinion is wrong or worse then yours or someone else's, thanks.
Ok thanks for the explanation.
Wooa where did the last sentence come from. Why the unnecessary hostility?
In this context, most folks would draw the distinction between publish and publicize. The scumbags published the movie. The folks who watched it and or reacted to it publicized it.
Today both of you accused me of attacking those who disagree with me. I would like to direct both of you to post 5 where I respectfully disagreed with CDG. And to CDG's response in post 6. Specifically the last sentence. Totally uncalled for in my humble opinion.
With this, I will stop providing instances in which the protagonist was the other party. Thanks again for the opportunity to state my side in an OPEN and TRANSPARENT manner.