Re: Peace overture: PTI caravan for Waziristan
Khan’s march into no-go zone a dangerous gamble
IF Imran Khan gets his way - and he’s a man accustomed to doing so - he will lead a motley caravan of leftists, conservatives and journalists into Pakistan’s tribal no-go zone this weekend.
Should his protest pilgrimage against US drone strikes occur as planned, and not be foiled by security forces as rumour now suggests, it will be the prime ministerial hopeful’s most audacious political stunt yet and a rare glimpse into a remote borderland known as one of the world’s most dangerous places.
Gathering in Islamabad yesterday for Khan’s much-hyped Waziristan peace rally were the extremes of his supporter base - young Pakistani conservatives who have responded to his anti-American message and leftist foreign activists.
Among the foreigners is outspoken British peace activist Clive Stafford-Smith, who wrote an open letter this week to US President Barack Obama asking - somewhat melodramatically - that he not be killed by a drone while in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Area.
“When I march into Waziristan on October 7th, 2012, please do not let the CIA kill me, Imran Khan, or the others - including many Americans - who will be marching with me to highlight the plight of the innocent people, including at least 174 children, targeted by drones in recent months and years,” read his letter, published on the website of human-rights group Reprieve.
By contrast, Khan has said he is prepared to die for his peace cause. No one can rule that out this weekend given the Pakistani Taliban’s mixed messages - on the one hand decrying Khan as a liberal who will be targeted, only to turn around and offer him their protection in South Waziristan.
Beyond the hyperbole, Smith and Khan’s message is that for every innocent civilian killed by a US drone in Pakistan, an “extended family of new enemies” is created. That message is gaining currency in America, just as it has the sympathy of a vast number of Pakistanis for whom the Obama administration’s accelerated drone campaign is a gross breach of sovereignty and the root of virulent anti-Americanism.
Pakistan’s mainstream parties were forced to take notice of Khan last October after a rally in Lahore for his Pakistan Freedom Party attracted 100,000 supporters. One in Karachi two months later drew 150,000. Yet, if new polls are to be believed, Khan’s so-called “political tsunami” is losing its momentum, and his audacious Waziristan march is drawing some cynical feedback.
Some have criticised his decision to change the venue from drone-hit North Waziristan, a safe haven for Taliban and Haqqani Network commanders, to Kotkai - a small village at the edge of South Waziristan.
Kotkai is the birthplace of Taliban Pakistan chief Hakimullah Mehsud but, after a military offensive there a few years ago, has since been restructured as a heavily secured “model village”.
“One wonders about the very rationale behind this peace march,” wrote local television anchor and columnist Saleem Safi this week.
"If it is being done to register protest against drone strikes, in the last seven years there were a total of 223 attacks in North Waziristan, while South Waziristan was targeted 76 times.
“And if the idea is to protest effectively against drone attacks, why risk the lives of a party leader and his supporters while making things even more difficult for the already overburdened security forces in the area?”
Prominent journalist, commentator and editor Najam Seddhi says Khan clearly believes there are votes in this weekend’s agitation, even though the presence of foreign women from the US Code Pink anti-war movement has alienated factions within his own party.
“If on the one hand this is seen as defying the army, then it will put paid to his critics who say he’s too close to the military. If it goes off well, it will endear to him to those electorates (in FATA and neighbouring Khyber Pakhtunkwa),” says Seddhi.
Yet the need to recapture a slipping vote bank is forcing Khan into a dangerous gamble.
“(Khan) was banking on an early election by October or November and has to do something to keep the attention of people,” Seddhi adds.
“If there is an attack or mishap anywhere along the line, then I suspect the media will go after him for jeopardising the lives of people.”
Medea Benjamin, one of 32 Code Pink activists in Pakistan this weekend to meet drone victims and join the march, says her group has been warned by US diplomats not to join the march because of a credible threat of attack.
None has been dissuaded.
“We sincerely believe nothing is going to happen in terms of violence,” Ms Benjamin told The Weekend Australian.
“If something did happen, I think the consequences would be a lot of people would start learning about, and asking about why we were here and what we were doing.”
Of that, there is no doubt.