Re: Panama case Final round SC Vs Shareef family
yes this is what Imran Z Khan has been saying!!!
question is, did they proved it in SC!!!
SC said!
no link or accusation of corruption on NS…not even in JIT report
Even if Maryam Nawaz is benificial owner…her dependence on father is not proved.
There might be some mistakes, but nothing major…
Above were commented by judges..
further more!
the fact that flats were purchased in 1993 couldnt be proven, hence the version where Sharifs say that they bought them in 2006 cannot be negated…
in 70s, none of the Sharifs were in power or politics…as a matter of fact, Sharifs along with many other families left or forced to leave Pakistan…where govt nationalized their assets..
again in 1999 Sharifs were exiled for good!!!
so what they did when they were thrown out of country, how much they lost or made…with whom they did business and how much they made…and how did they transferred money from GCC to UK…in none of Pakistan’s business…because the lived by GCC laws…they transferred money as per these laws, they bought property in UK as per law of UK…where none, the GCC and UK find any wrong doing…
at the allegation " Living beyond means" is laughable rather a bad joke!!! and thats the only thing JIT can comeup with…