Pakistan's tribal justice system: Often a vehicle for revenge

This is sad.

In Pakistan, tribal justice system is often a vehicle for revenge - latimes.com

HARIPUR, Pakistan — Suleman Khan demanded justice from the tribal elders. His wife had slept with another man, he said, and he wanted their permission to seek revenge. The elders deliberated for an hour, and then announced their verdict: Punish the man and his family any way you see fit.

Within minutes, Khan and his three brothers had broken into the man’s house. Only his 45-year-old mother, Shehnaz Bibi, and her teenage son were home. Armed with rifles and canes, they dragged Bibi out of the house and brought her to the village square. As dozens of astonished villagers watched, they stripped her naked and dragged her by the ankles, making several circles in the dirt with her body.

After about an hour, Khan and his brothers left. Bibi crawled over to grab her shawl and covered her dust-caked body with it.

“All the time, I was thinking, ‘I just want to die right now,’” Bibi recalled, using her head scarf to wipe away tears from her sun-weathered face. “I thought to myself, ‘I just can’t bear this anymore.’”

Pakistan straddles the line between centuries-old traditions and iPhone-era modernity, and few societal dilemmas illustrate that better than tribal jirgas, meetings convened by tribal elders such as the one that led to the attack on Bibi a year ago.

Jirgas are a cornerstone of tribal societies in Pakistan, from the badlands in the country’s northwest to the plains of Punjab and Sindh provinces. They decide issues such as property disputes and squabbles over debt, and in regions where conventional courts are not trusted, locals embrace them as a swift means of obtaining justice.

Often, however, they serve as vehicles for violence and revenge, and often the victims are women.

Jirgas routinely settle disputes through a tradition called vani, in which a family is ordered to agree to the marriage of one of its daughters to a male in the “plaintiff” family. The daughter can be in her teens, and in some cases she is only a few days old when the marriage contract is signed.

Other verdicts are tantamount to murder. Last year in a village outside the eastern city of Bahawalpur, a Punjabi council of elders known as a panchayat sanctioned the electrocution of a young woman by her family after the woman eloped against their wishes.

“These jirgas are dominated by men from the elite class, local influentials who usually have a very conservative mind-set,” said Farzana Bari, a prominent Pakistani women’s rights activist and director of gender rights studies atIslamabad’sQuaid-i-Azam University. “Their rulings usually give men control over women’s lives. It’s the responsibility of the state and law enforcement agencies to make sure that these jirgas don’t take place.”

Pakistani law on jirgas is murky. The country’s Supreme Court and other review courts have issued rulings that deem jirgas illegal, but those rulings don’t lay out what constitutes a jirga and don’t establish penalties for taking part in one. Pakistan’s legal code has no specific law banning jirgas.

Though jirgas routinely issue rulings that amount to a crime — such as giving a village the go-ahead to harm or even execute someone — federal and provincial authorities balk at acting against the councils, experts say, because they don’t want to risk alienating tribal communities and elders who embrace the tradition.

Human rights groups have been pushing for reforms, calling for laws that would make it illegal to convene or participate in jirgas that result in extrajudicial convictions and punishments, said Fouzia Saeed, director of the Mehergarh human rights institute in Islamabad.

The issue has gotten the attention of Supreme Court Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry, who in March ordered the country’s top provincial police officials to clamp down on jirgas that involved vani rulings.

“It seems we are living in the Stone Age,” Chaudhry remarked at the hearing.

In some parts of Pakistan, jirgas operate as an unsanctioned parallel justice system. Local police tolerate, and even participate in, the meetings.

The jirga that decided the fate of Sofia Niaz, a 15-year-old doe-eyed girl from a village outside the northern city of Mansehra, was held in a police station.

Sofia was already engaged when two men, one of them a distant relative and the other a stranger, kidnapped her in the dead of night and took her to a local madrasa, or Islamic religious school, the young woman said during a recent interview at the courthouse in Mansehra.

The motive behind the kidnapping never became clear, and the madrasa’s imam returned Sofia to her family unharmed later that night. Nevertheless, Sofia’s fiance insisted that the episode had tainted the girl, and demanded that a jirga be held to settle the dispute.

At the station, the police chief, Shah Mohammed Khan, presided over a gathering of elders from the families of the fiance and the two men who kidnapped Sofia. Elders debated for 11 hours, trying to persuade her father to accept their ruling: Sofia would marry Naveed, one of her kidnappers, and her fiance would marry one of the kidnapper’s sisters.

When Sofia’s father, Niaz Mohammed, refused to accept the verdict, Khan locked him in one of the station’s cells. With the police chief watching, one of the jirga elders put a gun to Mohammed’s head to force him to give in, Sofia said. “I told them: ‘Don’t torture my father. I will agree to marry Naveed.’ Under pressure, I accepted,” Sofia said.

The ceremony was held at the lockup. A month later, Sofia escaped from Naveed’s house and sought the help of a local human rights activist, who took the case to court. A judge granted Sofia a divorce and initiated criminal proceedings against her kidnappers, the jirga members and the police chief.

“There should be a special punishment for people who do such things,” Sofia said, “so that other girls don’t have to go through such misery.”

Authorities also made arrests in Shehnaz Bibi’s case. Although it’s rare for police to take action against jirga participants, charges are pending against the four men who dragged her from her home in the village of Nilour Bala, along with three other men who led the jirga. That’s little solace to Bibi, however. She is too ashamed to return to her village, and her family worries about reprisals by relatives of the arrested men.

Provincial government officials have given her a tiny flat in a weed-choked cluster of concrete apartment buildings on the edge of Haripur, a small city about 25 miles northwest of Islamabad. Outside her flat, a police officer wearing aviator sunglasses sat slumped in his lawn chair, a member of the 24-hour guard duty she and her family now receive.

“It’s impossible for us to get our lives back,” Bibi said, sitting on a cot in her darkened, bare-walled living room. “What happened to me is a curse that will stay with me for the rest of my life.”

Re: Pakistan's tribal justice system: Often a vehicle for revenge

I have read about these disgusting incidents plenty a times on our print media...

Re: Pakistan's tribal justice system: Often a vehicle for revenge

sick minded animals!!!

btw, Haripur does not fall under Federally Administered Tribal Areas, according to Constitution of Pakistan, then why they are allowed to hold jirgas?

Re: Pakistan's tribal justice system: Often a vehicle for revenge

Also, the whole jirga thing is just wrong and in conflict with constitution of Pakistan.

Re: Pakistan's tribal justice system: Often a vehicle for revenge

Hmmm

I think differently on this matter, originally Jirgas were the most purest form of democracy, to deny the rights and powers of a jirga is to deny true democracy.

However all Jirgas should be made up of men who have "lived" by the book, by the laws of the land and who are naturally gifted men with "leadership skills" but not neccasarily sanctioned leaders as we know them in the west.

I dont like the way everyone see's tribal people as "backwards" and somehow inherently evil. That is wrong and prejudiced, Jirgas are as old as the land they existed before these written laws and will do so long after the Corporate slave world collapses.

However I do not support Jirgas that are led by hereditary "chiefs" there is no such thing as Chieftains... men will force themselves upon others to be the heads but that does not mean they are democratic or leaders on merit. Such headmen are dictators.

Now when it comes to making rulings they should not forget they have a duty to look out for all parties involved and come to a settlement that is not cruel or degrading to any party. Violence should be the last and not the first resort.

There is no magic solution but to simply condemn all tribal people is wrong. All of us must respect one another for there to be true fairness in any society.

Not all Jirgas are bad either, I served for a while as a respected member of many tribal councils, not all tribals behave like jahil and those who do should be punished according to the laws of the land. Common sense is also important.

Re: Pakistan's tribal justice system: Often a vehicle for revenge

we are not bashing all tribal people out here. I'm sure there are many sane tribal people out there who believe in justice and who would condemn such shameful acts.

Jirgas are integral part of our tribal regions, the purpose was to give fair and just punishment to the ones who committed crime and if there are any disputes they should try to settle it down by listening to both side views. everyone is suppose to have a right to have their say.However, unfortunetly, in last few years there are couple of incidents which have happened and completely shocked everyone, punishments which were given to women/men were certainly not fair. those were sickening and brutal. this needs to stop. when these things make headlines, it just gives the impression all of them do these things for the sake of revenge and keeping the honour and that they would go to any length to achieve that. sane tribal people should challenge these disgusting decisions/verdicts. why do they remain quiet? silence is acceptance. this is the reason these people think they can do anything and get away with this. they should be given punishment, so that it would set example for others.

as far as I know the only jirga which is actually formally recognized is the one in tribally administered areas of Pakistan, others are not?

Re: Pakistan's tribal justice system: Often a vehicle for revenge

I agree with you there.

Problem is endemic, the same vices affect jirgas as the big federal governments or states too. The average person cannot challenge the big tid chiefs who are little more than elected dicators only a few hereditary chiefs hold any real power, the democracy is by representation... you see the system is flawed in both social forms, just the scale is different.

Only recognised Jirga is in tribal regions. NWFP "FATA", Kashmir etc. Other regions might have Panchayats but the police and federal laws apply there, in the tribal regions the tribal people have thier own laws and police.

Re: Pakistan's tribal justice system: Often a vehicle for revenge

Odd isn't it that the US uses the same tribal justice system in Afghanistan for its own ends?

Re: Pakistan's tribal justice system: Often a vehicle for revenge

i guess then, when one side is weaker, they cant really challenge the verdict? they have to abide by the decision. this is somewhat what happens in other parts of Pakistan, when one side is stronger, they always get to win the case. doesnt really matter if the decision represent the will of people. rich and powerful gets to win everytime.

in tribally administered regions they are planning on abolishing FCR law, which is good, if it happens. SC can ensure the enforcement of fundamental human rights, however, right now FATA is excluded from the jurisdiction of SC, status of FATA should also be changed, bring the locals into mainstream, give them their fundamental rights in light of our constitution.