Re: Pakistan’s top judge is suspended (Merged)
MKF: You wanted things to be one sided
It could have been but then, as far as I am concerned, I give a good thought before any comments or conclusions. I live and work in UK since many years and developed my values here that I believe is mostly fair and thoughtful. Nevertheless, I have regular contacts in Pakistan and well aware of many things that is happening in Pakistan.
So, let me explain you my thoughts and conclusion, how I came on conclusions that I wrote and how I look at things regarding CJ.
Starting point: First forget Musharraf, consider him as someone in power at the moment that can do something. Come on the issue of CJ and what is happening regarding this issue. Consider Musharraf as XYZ who is president, that’s all.
CJ name was sent for enquiry by president. Question arises why? I ask myself that if I know everything that CJ done or that I know all complains and allegations that was against CJ? Obviously not, as I am not in a position to know that, my knowledge comes from media.
Can media publish everything against CJ? No, because even if media can publish many things, be it true or lies on executive activities or even on President, publishing against CJ or thing related to court in Pakistan could still come under contempt of court. Actually, even Naeem Bukhari open letter was not published in any newspaper because of this reason.
Now who is the best person that would know all complains against CJ? Obviously President as he is the person that appoints CJ and is the post above him (especially in present situation, most complains against CJ would have gone to President).
Due to internet, I know that complains and allegations were there against CJ and some allegations were very severe. Naeem Bukhari letter may not have got published but still it was available on net. Other complains and allegations, I do not know though it is getting claimed by government now that there are many other allegations against CJ, other than what is made by Naeem Bukhari.
So, if there are allegations on CJ, in my personal opinion as well as opinion of any civilised person, post of CJ becomes questionable. Still, CJ should not get sacked without hearing and if hearing could not clear CJ, then allegations on CJ should get investigated (enquiry should be initiated).
In my opinion as well as opinion of any civilised person, leaving CJ in office after allegation would mean, running judiciary under tainted person, and that is obviously wrong in every way. Thus, allegations should get investigated (enquired). Nothing wrong in enquiry and that is the most civilised thing to do. It can separate black due to allegation with white of CJ innocence. After enquiry, CJ could be found guilty of allegation or could come crystal clear.
Now, how allegations on CJ could get enquired and investigated? For any investigation, first thing is to create conducive atmosphere, where allegations is investigated without interference or pressure from CJ and with full freedom to the investigating body consisting of respectable people. Conducive atmosphere for investigation can be created only when CJ is suspended. Else, if CJ is guilty of allegations, it is obvious that in office he would interfere with investigation, and if not guilty then his suspension would make no difference.
The most respectable investigating body could consist of supreme and high court judges and that is happening. All supreme and high court judges work under CJ and if CJ is not suspended, their working could not be considered as neutral and without interference or bias. In such situation any enquiry would be meaningless. Thus, I believe that suspension is automatic and part of any such enquiry, especially if enquiry is of someone holding key post like CJ.
Unless I believe that an alleged person could still stay CJ and no enquiry should be made on him, I have to agree with all what is happening. In my opinion I am not wrong, but if my opinion is wrong, you can point that out. Well, you can say that there were no allegations on CJ and if that is the case, all what is happening is wrong, but again, I believe that there were/are allegations on CJ and all what is happening is due to those allegations.
If you think that there were allegations, you can answer my previous post #189](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showpost.php?p=4849329&postcount=189) and try to answer the question I put there. I hope that you will answer my post as none really answered yet.
Anyhow, I know that whatever correct or wrong, we can have opinions. No one is in any position to impose opinion on others, but we can just mention. So, that is what I did, read opinion of others and mentioned mine. No arguments
In few days, all of this issue will be sorted out so let wait and see.