Re: Pakistan's top judge is suspended
Except that majority of legal experts in Pakistan disagree with you. The law is the law for a reason. Musharraf is not allowed to suspend the CJ or put him under house arrest. Period. Maybe the council can do this through a vote, but the President cannot and thus his actions are illegal. You don't like the law, you change it through proper procedures. Following the spirit of the law does not mean you go beyond what the law states. Next thing you will tell me is that the CJ can be executed on the spot by Musharraf just because there is no explicit reference against it in the constitution.
Brother, what can I say? It seems that you are not trying to understand the meaning of common sense that goes with laws. A law means something and a law cannot be farce. A law regarding enquiry would be farce if someone heads his own enquiry.
Just imagine that law says that you can drive if you have driving licence. You won’t find in any law that says that the driving licence has to be issued by the government of the country where you are driving (or a driving licence should be such that government of the country where you are driving approves that). So, according to the wording of the law, if I (or any friend) issue you a driving licence you should be able to drive, because you have that driving licence, though that is issued not by government but me, right?
Unfortunately, if you would do that, police would still arrest you of driving without licence. But if you will go to court on that arrest and argue that since law does not say that driving licence has to be issued by the government, I am right, because I have driving licence, even though the issuing body is Sa1eem, no court would accept that.
What you think, would it work? No …. Why? Because the sprite of the law (that means, common sense behind the law interpretation) would be that even though it does not say that licence is issued by the government, it should be, because else law of driving without driving licence would be meaningless, as anyone can make a driving licence on a piece of paper by writing driving licence and driving.
I hope you got it and hope you understood what common sense behind law means (that is sprite of law that makes a law meaningful). Same is true regarding enquiry of a person and suspension of that person before enquiry starts, else law become meaningless, just like law of driving licence.
As what some so-called legal experts in Pakistan are saying, they are just BS as it is possible that they are paid to say that or whatever. It seems that they are blank from top. If that is what they are interpreting, that would mean, they are saying that laws could be farce, but in reality their interpretation is farce.
** Another example:** Same is true regarding many things. Suppose you agree to sell me a car for 10 lac rupees and I took the car with promise to give you 10 lac rupees in a month. Now after a month I give you a piece of paper saying that this paper is 10 lac rupees because I wrote 10 lac rupees there, you will not accept it, would you. If you will go to court and I tell the judge that we agreed 10 lac rupees and I gave him 10 lac rupees, here it is, judge would also not accept that, why?
Because when we agreed 10 lac, it means currency that is issued by government and is legal tender, else that would be a farce promise and whatever said, no judge would accept my payment to you of 10 lac that I created by writing 10 lac on piece of paper.
*Thus, no law, no promise or no wording is complete without common sense that goes behind that and that common sense make sure that what is made law, what is promissed or what word is used, it has meaning and is not just a farce statement.
*