What an allegations people makes that is beyond imagination and have no grounds too. Most of their writing is BS without substance or intelligence.
Ishrat-ul-Ibad is a corrupt and murderer.
and who is putting that allegation? PPP Jiyalas ..
that is most funnies part of all alegations 
You know why I am rolling with laughter?
It is because of all cases and allegations that is made on Ishrat-ul-Ibad, it was by the government that by all evidence were themselves crooks, murderer and corrupts, while by all evidence, Ishrat-ul-Ibad is not only innocent and honest but Angel in front of them crooks.
**As for PPP, their Abba Jaan (their zil-le-subhani), that is Z A Bhutto, who was not only one that had charges of corruption and murder, but he was actually a murderer and legally can be called MURDERER. It is because we are not talking about charges of murder on BHUTTO but that he was convicted murderer and was hanged on crime of murder that he did. **
I am not talking about charges but actual conviction by all level of courts and then receiving punishment. ‘BHUTTO THE MURDERER’ was not only CONVICTED MURDERER but was given PUNISHMENT by HIGHEST COURT and was HANGED AS MURDERER. Not to call Bhutto MURDERER would be contempt of court.
Charge happens when a case goes in court and that is what these corrupt parties had put on Ishrat-ul-Ibad.
**Ishrat-ul-Ibad and many other politicians are MULZIM (person that were charged but never convicted from any court, hence cannot be called Mujrim - a convict) of murder but Z A BHUTTO was MUJRIM (had final conviction from court), a murderer (Whose case went to court, charges proven and he was convicted, then hanged on that charge). **
[No one ever says that Bhutto was not convicted murderer. Only thing people say that since verdict on him regarding 3rd degree murder was split, he should not have been hanged but should have been given life imprisonment. Nevertheless, we mortals have no right to challenge the verdict of highest court in Pakistan]
YOU CANNOT CALL A PERSON MURDERER JUST BECAUSE A CASE HAD BEEN REGISTERED IN COURT OF MURDER BUT YOU CAN CALL A PERSON MURDERER WHEN COURT HAD ACCEPTED THAT CHARGE AND GIVEN VERDICT.
Now there is no court in the world that have convicted Ishrat-ul-Ibad of murder or any crime, that a person can call him murderer or criminal. He is murderer as much as Zardari, Bainazeer, Nawaz and well, most of our politicians are, murderers, as all have charges against them by people (charges on some went to court and some did not, and that does not matter, charges are still there).
As for financial corruption, living on government help in UK is evidence that Ishrat-ul-Ibad did not do any financial corruption.
If he did, he did not needed little money from British government to survive. Well, if he was living on help, he must be living in UK modestly, as if he was living on government money, British govenment eyes would have been always on him. British government make sure that the way Ishrat-ul-Ibad must be living, he was not lying to the government that he has no money to even survive.
Pakistani corrupt Bas*ds in UK are driving brand new cars worth 100 thousand pounds and own millions of pound property, spend and live like kings. But Ishrat-ul-Ibad must be living a poor life in UK if he was getting government help (as he was).
For most of Pakistani corrupts Bas*ds, especially those that were minister during corrupt governments of past, few thousand pounds is something they can give in charity every day. They will not take one thousand pound a month to live from British government that have given them asylum, neither British government, that gives financial help after all enquiry of a person financial standing, would give help to the crooks that have corrupt money.
Ishrat-ul-Ibad got political asylum in UK and must have had no money neither British government allows people on political asylum to work while their cases is with government, and if that person cannot afford to live, government gives financial help, so Ishrat-ul-Ibad was not doing any crime rather it shows that while in power, he was financially honest.
Later when he became Governor, he went to Pakistan but his family was still in UK, and obviously Governor pay in Pakistan is not enough to support a family in UK, thus they taking financial help while in UK was also not wrong. Well, if it was wrong then Ishrat-ul-Ibad would not have been able to come to UK that he does quite often, as if that would have been the case, if he would have entered UK, British government would arrest him.
Note: Before taking political asylum in UK, Ishrat-ul-Ibad held many ministerial posts in Pakistan, including post as health minister. It is no joke that UK government if thinking that he has money would have given him money to survive.
Pakistani corrupt ministers belonging to PPP and other parties gather enough corruption money while in power that they would not need helps of petty money from governments that give them asylum to live nor British government is so stupid that they would give help to such people with money, as they financially help only needy after enquiry.
Well, PPP and Nawaz party office holders (rather most Pakistani corrupt ministers and even corrupt politicians in parliament, other then honest ones) have their own dwellings in UK and other western countries, come to UK and spend like kings, have bank accounts in UK and other western countries with huge money in them, and British government knows that (as they make all enquiries about a person before giving them financial help, that any British national would be able to tell).
Look at NS and BB, the leader of corrupts and murderers that are living in UK. If they would go to British government for help for their living, government would not only laugh on that but would deport them because of their dishonesty (as having money and asking for help from government to live is such dishonesty that if asylum seeker would do, they could easily get into trouble).
These mega corrupts are so poor that they do not have enough money to pay any taxes in Pakistan but have huge property investments and bulging bank accounts in UK. Even their chaily chamchay that live around these corrupt Bass (cleaning their asses) gets more hard earned Pakistani money from these corrupt Bass then what Ishrat-ul-Ibad ever got from British government just to survive in UK (where a two bedroom flat cost over thousand pounds in rent).
Just imagine that these corrupt Bas*s of PPP, MPL and others spend many thousand pounds of stolen Pakistani money in UK while this honest person had no money that he needed help of thousand pound to survive in UK and then the choohays of these parties are calling him corrupt and murderer.
So, all this shows that Ishrat-ul-Ibad was neither financially corrupt nor murderer. The only one Pakistani politician that was murderer and should be called murderer was Abba Jaan of PPP, that was Z A Bhutto. Anyone that does not or would not call ZA Bhutto a murderer is actually can be charged of contempt of court (and legally, court can actually punish such person on charges of contempt of court).
[Note: I live in UK and have British nationality (along with Pakistani nationality) to know how British system works, so I am not Bll Shting. Any person from UK would be able to confirm what I wrote].
To say that Musharraf has appointed a murderer as governor of sindh is an allegation that if said in public, I believe that Ishrat-ul-Ibad and Musharraf, if they want to, could sue these people and court would be bound to punish them, as Ishrat-ul-Ibad is not convicted of murder in any court any where in the world.
Obviously, after death the ultimate judge (Allah) would also ask the reason for allegations that has to be provided with certainty and if not provided, would punish the culprits, unless they provide valid reason, like one can provide regarding Murderer Naseer-ullah Baber who accepted in interviews that he did get people killed out of court and thus he can be called murderer on his own conviction.