Re: Pakistan’s Establishment
You are saying it same way Pakistani corrupts say, that is, prove it. When I will prove it, then same corrupt would tell, to go to court. If I would go to court then, corrupt would buy/influence court full of corrupt judges (as Thug Iftikhar did) so that judges reject that proof however clear that maybe. Well, corrupt Iftikhar thug, father of corrupts is a step ahead, as he even stopped investigation on his corruption using SC judges. Woh tou currpton ka bhie abba jaan nikla 
Why you are surprised because people of Karachi did not came out to support daddy of corruption, the great corrupt Iftikhar? People in Karachi are not corrupt (or maybe less corrupt) and hence obviously they did not come out to support daddy of corruption, Iftikahr Chaudhary. Good thing they did not, as if they would have, they would be regarded supporter of corrupts too.
You should know that lying is bad, bad, and really bad. You can call me brainless or hide but you should not lie and here you are lying (either due to misinformation or intentionally).
As for constitution of Pakistan, any person can allege a judge including CJ and send that allegation to President. It is duty of President to decide and if consider appropriate, send that allegation to SJC for investigation.
Now let see where you are lying or accusing baselessly due to misinformation:
It is lie (or your misinformation) that SJC removes CJ. SJC only investigates under the direction of President and sends report to President. It is President who sees the report and decides if he would use that report to sack CJ or let CJ stay in duty.
1: Put pressure on CJ to resign - failed to do so:
What Pressure? President had report alleging Iftikhar Chaudhary that he was corrupt characterless thug, so President showed him those allegations and asked him that if he would like to contest those allegations or resign (you cannot say that asking such was pressure). Corrupt Thug Iftikhar said that he would contest. Once corrupt Iftikhar decided to contest, Musharraf as PRESIDENT suspended Iftikhar from CJ post and send allegations as reference to SJC for investigation (nothing wrong there, something every good manager should do). So, no big deal unless one is corrupt and thinks that corrupt iftikhar should not be called and given option regardless of allegations against him. As regarding putting pressure on Iftikhar, that is lie.
[Note: Iftikhar decided to contest his corruption report because he thought that as CJ he would head SJC, and as happens in Pakistan, he would bring SJC investigation results according to his wishes. Musharraf neutralised him by suspending him, something was necessary so that SJC could work without bias or pressure. That was shock for Iftikhar as he realised he would get caught pants down. So, he went to court against suspension. All Pakistani corrupts came out to support Iftikhar (their peti-bhai in corruption and God of corrupts). Corrupt politicians and corrupts from civil society with their bhangra on road gave him full support. Corrupts in media started spreading misinformation that Iftikhar was sacked (when he was suspended), and in the end corrupt judges of SC not only lifted suspension over him but stopped SJC to investigate him]
2: Send ref. To SJC and try to buy/influence judges .. failed here again.
Again lies (maybe due to misinformation). Buy/influence judges … is complete lies. Only corrupt Riawand thugs do that and there is audio recording that proves it, where characterless Shahbaz the thug can be heard directing SC judge (Malik Qayum) to give verdict against Zardari and also to get soft on Shabaz’s men.
Musharraf did not even send any case to SC neither he needed to, rather Mushraff asked SJC to investigate corrupt Iftikhar. SJC was supposed to investigate and send their report to President. That is all. It was Iftikhar who went to SC, called all corrupt past politicians to help him, and started bhangra on road so to influence SC so that they lift his suspension. Obviously, he wanted that suspension to get lifted so that he could influence SJC. Anyhow, under corrupt Iftikhar pressure plus pressure of politicians SC did more than lifting suspension. They even directed SJC to stop investigation.
Thus, reality on ground is that it was not Musharraf or anyone in government, but it was Bhangra on road by supporters of corrupt thug Iftikhar and his team of monkeys in black coat, plus corrupt politicians who started using their clout on SC Judges, pressurised judges to help corrupt Iftikhar.
Another proof is that, SC stopped SJC from investigating corrupt thug Iftikahr Chaudhary, something SC has no right to do so, but still SC did, showed who did everything to influence or buy judges and even make them give judgement on things they had no right.
It is amazing that SJC who is suppose to be more powerful higher body then SC and consists of senior most SC judges were stopped by SC to investigate on corrupt thug Iftikhar (something that can only happen in Pakistan, a society where corrupts are Gods).
3: Impose martial law and he did it this time?
Impose martial law … you mean 1999 martial when the corrupt thug and opportunist Iftikhar used that opportunity to get vacated place in SC due to Martial law as SC judge and later used his corrupt character doing everything to bolster that Martial law so to become CJ?
Note: We all know that Musharraf sent referenced to SJC. We also know what was in that reference. I claimed that SC illegally stopped SJC from investigation so that corruption of Iftikhar does not come on surface, and that also gets confirmed by SJC. Hence according to me, present situation is that, there is no report of SJC on Iftikhar.
If you think I am lying than it means SJC must have produced their report regarding reference on Iftikhar’s corruption, giving answer to each and every allegation in that reference, either clearing him or implicating him. If that is the case, then that report must be present, and if that report is present then please show me that report of SJC on their investigation of corrupt thug Iftikhar.
As far as I am concerned, obviously you will not be able to show SJC report on reference because what I wrote is truth. If I am lying and you are telling truth then you will find that report and would be able to show it. Hence, presence or absence of report by SJC on reference itself is proof who is telling truth and who is not.