Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

Poor Englishmen were dreaming of being world champions after beating the invincible aussies but they failed miserably to achieve such status after horrible defeats against formidable Pakistanis. Yes, I am assuming that Pakistan will defeat England in the current test match and no, my prediction is not based on biasedness rather, the performance of the Pakistani team in last 15 test matches or so leads me to this conclusion.

It is refreshing to see Pakistani team targeting every match with a clinical approach. It is probably the first time you see a Pakistani team playing according to a plan targeting opponents’ weaknesses. Interestingly, the only other Pakistani teams that produced superb results on a regular basis were teams of the 50s and 80s. Just like the current Pakistani team, the Pakistani teams of the 50s and 80s, with an exception of few extremely talented payers, were composed of mediocre but dedicated players led by some exemplary leaders.

That leads me to make an interesting observation. Though there is no significance to this observation, it is hard to ignore the presence of a cyclic element in the performance of the Pakistani team throughout its history. It almost appears to me that the Pakistani team performs, good or bad, in a 15-year cycle, give or take 2 or 3 years.

The first cycle that extended from 1951 to 1965 saw the Pakistani team performing great on a regular basis. The team primarily consisted of some mediocre but very dedicated players e.g. Khan Mohammad, Imtiaz Ahmad, Nazar Muhammad, Mahmood Hussain etc. The only superstars in that period were Fazal Mahmood and Hanif Muhammad. Yet, this Pakistani team beat Australia, WI, England and India within few years of gaining ICC status. However, the point to be noted is that the team was led by, arguably, the best Pakistani tactician of all time, Abdul Hafiz Kardar.

This golden period was followed by a gloomy period from 1965 to 1980 though Pakistani team had some outstanding superstars in that period. 1964 saw the emergence of Majid khan and Asif Iqbal followed by the appearance of the new batting sensation, Zaheer Abass, in 1969 and a bowling sensation, Imran Khan, in 1971. Pakistan also had the services of Wasim Bari in that period, arguably, the best wicket-keeper Pakistan ever had. Despite the presence of such gifted players, Pakistani team never played to its true potential on a regular basis. The worst point of this period was when this team at its full strength lost to India in India by 2-0. The point to be noted is that throughout 1965 to 1980, Pakistani team was devoid of a solid leadership with a brief period of Mushtaq Muhammad the only exception. Pakistani team had at least 8 international superstars in that period with all of them having lead Pakistan at some point in their careers. Yet, this team was never able to beat England in England or India in India!

This gloomy period was followed by another golden period from 1980 to 1992. Again, the pattern was the same as observed in the 50s. The Pakistani team of the 80s consisted of mediocre but dedicated players like mudassar nazar, mansoor akhthar, salim malik, ijaz ahmad, asif mujtaba, salim yousaf, salim jaffar and yet, this team was able to beat England in England, India in India, WI in WI and Sri-Lanka in Sri-Lanka. The only real superstars in that period were Imran Khan and Javed Miandad. Again, just like the 50s, for majority of the 80s, the team was led by an exemplary leader Imran Khan. This team reached its peak when it won the 1992 World Cup.

This golden period was followed by one of the worst periods in Pakistani cricket from 1992 to 2003. Pakistani team had some outstanding superstars in this period e.g. Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Saeed Anwar, Moin Khan, Saqlain Mushtaq etc. Yet, this team produced one of the most unpredictable performances in Pakistani cricket history. On a given day, this team was able to beat Australia without any problem and then there were times when teams like Zimbabwe and Srilanka were able to beat it on its own soil without any problem. And if this was not enough, several match fixing scandals also popped up in the same period! Interestingly, this team never had a consistent leadership and just like the 70s, this team also had at least 8 international superstars in it with all of them having lead Pakistan at some point in their careers!

And this dark period is followed by the current period with consistent results. Again, the trend looks the same like 50s and 80s. No superstars, mediocre but extremely dedicated players and a consistent leadership.

In essence, if you want to compare the shear talent of this current team with Pakistani teams of 70s and 90s, there is no comparison. Pakistani teams of 70s and 90s were full of superstars. But what those super-star laden teams lacked the most, this much less-talented team carries the most i.e. dedication and an immense desire to put their weight in one direction rather than applying their individual brilliance in separate directions. In addition, it is extremely important to have a consistent leadership for a longer period of time as is evidenced in the past. As I said earlier, there is no scientific basis for the observation I made but if the trend I described above prevails, lets celebrate because based on the past examples, it will continue till 2015!

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

Well, Salim Malik was neither mediocre nor dedicated. I’d also include l Rameez Raja, Mohsin Khan, Qasim Omer among the above-mediocre players of that period. Also, don’t forget to include Abdul Qadir among the stars.

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

As pointed out Saleem Malik was not a mediocre player. Pakistan never beat West Indies in West Indies, we drew a series there. We might as well have won if it wasnt for biased umpiring but nevertheless the records would show we never won a test series there. The superstar in that period also include Wasim Akram and in the later part of that “golden period” we can include Waqar Younis to the list.

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

The current team is by no means mediocre. Inzamam, Yousuf, Kamran Akmal, Abdul Razzaq, Shoaib Akhtar, Kaneria are all world class players and could find their way into most teams so you cant terms them as mediocre. Thats just at test level I am talking about if you are talking ODI squad then include Shoaib Malik, Shahid Afridi and Rana Naved to the list as well. These are not mediocre players, they are a talented bunch who can find their way into most teams without a problem.

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

I think the word "mediocre" needs to be defined carefully. "Mediocre" players play in galli mohalla cricket, or club cricket. By the time you are playing for the national team, there should be nothing "mediocre" about you, in the true sense of the word. However, if I understand it correctly, PD mentions the word to differentiate from "super stars". Kamran Akmal is an extremely talented keeper, and will probably make my team every time, it is a stretch to claim that he is a "super star".

Being a "super-star" is a mental condition, more than talent. In the current Pakistan lot, I think there are only two "super stars" - Inzamam and Shoaib Akhtar. The rest are just fantastic players.

PD, your analysis is interesting. A few nit-pickings aside (whether Salim Malik was a glorious batsman or a slimy cheat and a moderately overpowering player is debatable), but the crux of your argument is valild. Its the leadership and the cohesiveness of the team that wins games. Individual brilliance can only produce erratic results. The current West Indian team is a testament to that. Though for us Pakistanis 70's and 90's still have vivid memories.

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

^ very true, present bunch of players are indeed wonderful lot as good as we ever had.

I think in that 92 period also emerged Inzimam, and I rate him over Miandad.

good observations

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

Inzimam is a super star on the basis of his performance over 14- 15 years n Akhter only on getting injured

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

^ As I said before, being a superstar is more about the mental state. Akhtar is a superstar, through and through.

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

agree,

and also admit

he has come up much better in this series, hope he continues

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

Interesting observations but I don't think our team was horrible from the 90s on, if we had managed to bother to show up for one match against Australia, we would be calling it the greatest team ever. One bad loss to India in 1996 and Australia in 1999 can't define a team. Yes, the period from 2003-2004 was pure rebuilding but it is amazing how fast the team has come back up, it shows the level of talent in Pakistan. As long as our best athletes continue to play cricket, we will field competitive teams.

And I think you short change today's lineup, the team is young so we don't realize the talent level but keep watching, Shahid Afridi, Shoaib Malik, Yunus Khan, Inzamam the Great, Danish Kaneria and Youhana will be counted amongst the best to don the green jersey.

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

Yes Faisal, you are right. My intent was to differentiate between the “normal” players” and the "super stars" to make a point. Yes, Rana, Sami, Kamran Akmal, Abdul Razzaq, Kaneria are good players but when you compare them to the likes of Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Saqlain Mustaq, Saeed Anwar, Rashid Latif and Javed Miandad, there is an undeniable difference in caliber. Similarly, in the 80s, we had Asif Mujtaba, Muadassar Nazar, Mohsin Khan, Mohsin Kamal, Salim Jaffar, Mansoor Akhtar, Ijaz Ahmad, Slaeem Yousaf and iqbal qasim and all of them were decent players but when you compare them to the likes of Zaheer Abass, Majid Khan, Asif Iqbal, Mushtaq Muhammad, Wasim bari and Sarfraz Nawaz , there is no comparison in terms of the shear talent. Yet, our team of the 80s performed more consistently than our team of the 70s. Yes, our teams of the 70s and 90s had some moments of celebration (a win against aussies in sydney 1976, beating formidable WI in WI in a test match in the 70s, beating England in England twice in the 90s) but these brilliant teams never translated their shear talent into a consistent performance.

Salim Malik is a unique case. I did think twice before including his name in the list of mediocre players but remember, I included his name in the list of mediocre players for the 80s. Malik sahib had an extremely long career. If I am correct, he started playing cricket for Pakistan in 1982. However he was never a world class player throughout the 80s. I do not remember him playing any outstanding innings except the one he played in Headingley in 1987 against England. And yes, how could we forget his mesmerizing innings in Calcutta in 1987 but I guess, that is about it. So, he was a decent player but not an exceptional one based on his performance for almost 10 years in the 80s. But he transformed himself into a world class player in the 90s. so I guess, Malik is an exception and we can take him out of the equation for our analysis.

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

Yet, our team of the 90s did lose a test series to Zimbabwe and Sri lanka on its own soil! Actually sri lanka beat us twice…and can you believe that Zimbabwe beat our strong team of the 90s at our own soil……England also beat us the test series on our own soil and so did Australia in the 90s!..that is the point I am trying to make. We had some exceptional performances but they were scattered. But in the 50s, 80s and mahsllah now, we are much more consistent.

Re: Pakistani Team and Its Cyclic Performance - An Observation

In all this praise, don't forget that this team still revolves around the talent that was "spotted" by some good eye, it wasn't an outcome of our domestic cricket or some "professional" academy.