Again, to much maybe this and maybe that. To much conjecture to ever draw any conclusion. You also assume to understand the motives of the US without any real direct insight. You believe they are a certain way, but how do you know your reading of American motives isn’t being influenced by your own bias? For example, Pakistanis judge events Baluchistan very differently from most Balochis. both have their own bias.
Generally speaking, the more complicated and convoluted the motives become, the less accurate the conclusion. the simplest rational is usually the most accurate.