Yasir 
[thumb=E]341326_5007275.JPG[/thumb]
[thumb=E]351326_5007275.JPG[/thumb]
Hameed looks like a wonderful batting prospect for Pak. Never seen him bat but from following his innings on cricinfo he appeared to be a confident aggressive player.
Too bad he did not get his century....
Razzaq begins with a 4
i wish he would have gotten his hundred mannnnnnnnnnnn
Now we need atleast a big partnership to get beyond 364
If we can save the follow on than I think this match will be a draw. Still need 146 to save the follow on.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Zero_one: *
Now we need atleast a big partnership to get beyond 364
[/QUOTE]
Now any big partnership will be a luck, since we got only one specialist batsman on the crease.
Pak's run rate is 3.69 which is very good for a test match.
i hope inzi can plays like the time he got 300+ against nz in PAK
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *
Pak's run rate is 3.69 which is very good for a test match.
[/QUOTE]
at the cost of 4 wickets.
^218/4 is usually a respectable score.
How good are the following with the bat :
Umar Gul
Shabbir,
Danish
and Sami
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *
How good are the following with the bat :
Umar Gul
Shabbir,
Danish
and Sami
[/QUOTE]
well (my opinion) combined they may able to put on 30 odd runs together may be a bit more ..... but then who know what this test brings
damn Fox will not show the 2nd Test of this series 
they r going to show AUS vs. IND 3rd Test
A slashing 4 four by Razzler
seems like except *SOME1 * the rest has gone to bed
[thumb=E]361326_3264773.JPG[/thumb]
im here how much needed for follow on (wat is follow on n e way, its good if pakistan reach i think) 168 right?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by PakPathan1: *
im here how much needed for follow on (wat is follow on n e way, its good if pakistan reach i think) 168 right?
[/QUOTE]
It is very simple to figure out the follow on, for a test match subtract the 200 from first innings total. So for this match Pakistan can avoid follow on by scoring 364. :)