Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

**Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees
**

LAHORE: Pakistan plans to cancel refugee status for all Afghans living in the country at the end of this year, leaving some three million displaced people – the world’s biggest cluster of refugees – facing possible expulsion to a country that many barely know.

The west is pressing Pakistan to reconsider its policy, which puts it at odds with the United Nations and other international partners. The international community and the Afghan government have no strategy prepared to deal with any such influx of people.

However, Pakistan’s top administrator in-charge of the Afghan refugee issue, Habibullah Khan, the States and Frontier Regions Ministry secretary, told the Guardian that Islamabad would not relent. **“The international community desires us to review this policy but we are clear on this point. The refugees have become a threat to law and order, security, demography, economy and local culture. Enough is enough,” **he said.

“If the international community is so concerned, they should open the doors of their countries to these refugees. Afghans will be more than happy to be absorbed by the developed countries, like Western Europe, USA, Canada, Australia.”

Full Report

I think it’s fair for Pakistan to go ahead with this decision. Though I doubt if it will be actualized. There is no doubt about the refugees — registered or otherwise — being a security threat to the host in many ways. Pakistan has been an unsung hero for housing the biggest number of refugees for a long time despite the fact that UN peanuts were not enough to feed the guests and that Pakistan’s own infrastructure, economic and security apparatus were not good enough to do the job. But just like everything else, the diktat will reveal at us and we will put it into effect willy-nilly.

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

I dont think its possible to repatriate them now, as the countries who wanted the NATO supplies opened wouldnt want them knocking their doors after Pakistan sends them back.

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

3 Million people in 6 months? Impossible. Plus they will just come back.

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

About time, and if the NATO countries and other states such as Saudi and Qatar etc have problem with it, they are more than welcome to have them in their countries.

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

He put it very bluntly and I hope the government sticks to its stance. But I am hoping against hope.

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

I dont think anything will happen in this space, during the past 10 years about 3.7 million Afghans were repatriated, most of them have returned. If Pakistan does not enhance their refugee status, they will just become illegal and hence a bigger problem for us.

Pakistan plans to revoke Afghans’ refugee status could displace 3 million | World news | guardian.co.uk

**Pakistan plans to cancel refugee status for all Afghans living in the country at the end of this year, leaving some 3 million displaced people – the world’s biggest cluster of refugees – facing possible expulsion to a country that many barely know.
**
Pushing the refugees into Afghanistan would be likely to create a new crisis for that country, already struggling with an insurgency and an economy almost entirely dependent on the western presence and the illicit drug trade.

**The west is pressing Pakistan to reconsider its policy, which puts it at odds with the United Nations and other international partners. The international community and the Afghan government have no strategy prepared to deal with any such influx of people.
**
However, Pakistan’s top administrator in charge of the Afghan refugee issue, Habibullah Khan, secretary of the ministry of states and frontier regions, told the Guardian that Islamabad would not relent. “The international community desires us to review this policy but we are clear on this point. The refugees have become a threat to law and order, security, demography, economy and local culture. Enough is enough,” he said.

**“If the international community is so concerned, they should open the doors of their countries to these refugees. Afghans will be more than happy to be absorbed by the developed countries, like western Europe, USA, Canada, Australia.”
**
Pakistan has hosted Afghan refugees for more than 30 years, after they fled the Soviet invasion in the 1980s, the horrors of the civil war, Taliban rule and, most recently, the conflict triggered by the US-led invasion of the country in late 2001. Whole generations have grown up in Pakistan and do not know their homeland. It is the largest and longest-running refugee problem in the world.

**There are currently 1.7 million Afghan refugees registered in Pakistan – more than half of them under 18 – of whom 630,000 live in camps. A further 1 million are estimated to be living in the country unregistered and therefore illegally.
**
“After 31 December 2012, there is no plan to extend the validity of the POR [proof of registration] cards of Afghan refugees. Those currently registered will lose the status of refugees. They will be treated under the law of the land. The provincial governments have already been asked to treat the existing unregistered refugees as illegal immigrants,” said Khan.

Khan declined to spell out what would happen to the refugees after the end of the year but, if the policy sticks, they will all be in the country illegally and liable to be thrown out.

The UN is running a voluntary repatriation programme but it is making slow progress. So far this year, it has been able to entice just 41,000 people to return to Afghanistan, a slight increase on the 35,000 who returned in the first half of 2011. **Since 2002, the UN has repatriated 3.7 million Afghans to Afghanistan, but the rate of return stalled in recent years as the war intensified, while it is likely that many of the returnees have slipped back into Pakistan, given that today there are almost as many Afghan refugees in Pakistan as there were in 2002.
**
Earlier this year, Baroness Amos, the former British cabinet minister who is now the UN humanitarian affairs chief, said she was “appalled” by the conditions for returning refugees, after visiting a camp for them in Kabul. Once they reach Afghanistan, returners are entitled to a one-off $150 (£96) per person from the UN.

Neill Wright, the Pakistan representative of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), said that the UN would still recognise registered Afghans in Pakistan as refugees after the end of 2012 under international law, “until a durable solution can be found”.

“We hope that the government of Pakistan will continue to recognise them as refugees,” said Wright. “Returning them to Afghanistan could destabilise the country further at a time when it is already experiencing instability from the drawdown of international forces.”

**While some Afghans have prospered in Pakistan, the poverty of the majority is obvious, even in Islamabad. On the outskirts of the city, opposite the huge and gleaming Metro supermarket where it is possible to buy everything from imported salmon to a washing machine, lies a little mud-shack settlement of Afghan refugees, all of them officially registered.
**
**No one in the few dozen houses of Sorang Abadi village can read or write, none of their children goes to school, there is no electricity or water. Yet none wants to return to Afghanistan.
**
“I haven’t stepped across the border in 30 years,” said Sher Zaman, 62, originally from the northern Afghan province of Kunduz. “I don’t even have a single room to go to in Afghanistan. I’m a poor man. I hope I can stay here and die here.”

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

Pakistan, UNHCR deny reports of Afghan refugees’ forced expulsion – The Express Tribune

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

Its about time (in fact overdue for long time). If UN, US, SA and others have problem, they can have them by plane load. Pakistan is putting in so many resources when its on economy is going down the drain and above all law and orders issues that these refugees has created is out of control now.

I wish we had contained them in refugee camps instead of allowing them to pouring into cities....

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

yes please, send them back. we have been hosting them since last 30 years. its about time they should go back to their land, we have already paid a heavy price for our hospitality.

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

And the buggers arn't even thankful. Afghanistan generally dislikes Pakistan and loves india.

Kick em out.

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

They hate us but not a single one of em want to leave... Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

Thousands of Afghan Refugees in Limbo in Pakistan - ABC News

Abdul Karim walked for nearly 12 hours to cross the border into Pakistan and escape the warlords who were raining rockets on his neighborhood in the Afghan capital Kabul. That was nearly two decades ago, when he was a young teenager. Since then, he’s gotten married and raised six children, all born in Pakistan.

He is one of 1.7 million Afghan refugees who have been living in limbo in Pakistan for years as part of one of the world’s largest and longest-running refugee crisis. But after 30 years of hosting Afghans, many Pakistanis are growing frustrated with the toll they say the refugee population is taking on their country, and pressure is mounting on the government to do something.

The Pakistani government is now weighing whether to remove their refugee status, a step that would increase the pressure on them to go home.

Most of the refugees can’t fathom returning to Afghanistan any time soon. They may feel like outsiders in Pakistan, but they say their homeland is still too violent and desperately poor.

“Unless the Pakistani government forced us back to Kabul, I am in no mood to go there,” said Karim. “There is no safety… We have nothing left there.”

The Afghan population in Pakistan is the legacy of Afghanistan’s repeated conflicts. Millions streamed across the border after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, the start of a decade-long war against the occupation. After the Soviets pulled out, the country was torn apart by fighting between warlords, and more Afghans fled. When the Taliban rose to power in 1996 their strict form of Sunni Islam further terrorized the population.

The 1.7 million Afghans registered as refugees include those who remain from those exoduses and their children born since. More than a third of them live in camps, while the rest are scattered across Pakistan. Alongside them, another roughly 1 million Afghans are believed to be living in the country illegally.

A combination of reasons keeps them from returning. There are the big concerns: Afghanistan’s woeful economy, fears that its turmoil will only worsen when international forces leave at the end of 2014. And there are the equally weighty personal worries: Many parents worry their kids won’t get a decent education in Afghanistan or, if they’re girls, maybe no education at all.

Others like Kowki Nazari have no prospect of finding a job in Afghanistan. She fled to Pakistan after her husband was imprisoned and tortured by the Taliban. She crossed the border by donkey in the dead of night and made her way to Rawalpindi, next to Islamabad, where she now works as a house cleaner. Like many people in this neighborhood she is an ethnic Hazara, a minority group in Afghanistan. Most Hazaras are Shiite and as such have often been persecuted by Sunni extremists like the Taliban who don’t consider them true Muslims.

If she returned to Afghanistan, she says her family would be destitute.

“I can’t work there because it’s not like Pakistan where the women are free to work,” she said.

As the refugee crisis has dragged on, there is a sense in Pakistan that the Afghans have become a burden the country should no longer be required to carry. Generosity is turning to frustration and accusations that Afghans are responsible for crime and are undermining Pakistan’s security. Whether that suspicion is driven by fact or xenophobia, the atmosphere has become more hostile.

Earlier this summer, officials in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province threatened to evict thousands of undocumented Afghans. The deadline passed without an increase in deportations but worried aid groups and Afghans.

In an interview with The Associated Press, the secretary in charge of the States and Frontier Regions Ministry, which has primary responsibility for refugee issues, said the Pakistani government would not renew the refugee status cards for registered Afghans when they expire Dec. 31.

Habibullah Khan said Pakistan would not forcibly evict anyone, but said once the cards are revoked it would encourage people to return.

The ultimate decision on whether to renew them will be made by the Cabinet.

The ID card, issued by the government, provides registered Afghan refugees with certain protections. The cards are used for everyday activities like banking or registering for school. Revoking them would potentially make Afghans much more susceptible to harassment by police.

When asked whether it was safe for the Afghans to go home, Khan said the situation in Pakistan was not ideal either.

“Are these conditions exceptional to Afghanistan? If somebody asks me ‘Oh, there are bomb threats in Kabul?’ Then I would say ‘Then what about Peshawar? What about Karachi? What about Baluchistan?’” said Khan.

Khan also said every year tens of thousands of children are born to Afghan families in Pakistan, which often outweighs the number of people leaving. Another concern for the Pakistani government is that the number of Afghans returning home is slowing, said the head of the United Nations’ refugee agency in Pakistan, Neill Wright. Last year 52,096 Afghans were repatriated under a U.N.-run program, according to U.N. figures. That was the second lowest number since the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. So far this year about 42,000 Afghans have returned.

The government has grumbled in the past about renewing the cards. The new warnings could be an attempt to play to public opinion or to pressure the international community for more help.

But if it carries out the threat, Afghans could face more difficulty getting services and greater day-to-day troubles. Afghans complain that police stop them for their papers and if they don’t have them, demand bribes not to detain them.

“Now we have only four months before the expiration of the cards, and after that the police and official authorities will try to harass us,” said Ehsanullah Elaj, who came to Pakistan 16 years ago just as the Taliban was taking over his homeland. He was injured on three separate occasions during bombings in his home province of Kunduz.

If the cards are not renewed, the Afghans would still be considered refugees by the U.N., Wright said. The agency could issue its own identity documentation but it’s unclear how much weight those would carry in Pakistan.

At a windswept encampment on Islamabad’s outskirts, a group of Pashtun refugees from Afghanistan has built huts out of mud and straw. There is no school for their kids, and the local food stall sells only a few goods, such as packets of tea and mosquito repellant.

Still, many said they want to stay.

“If they are serious about pushing us back to Afghanistan, then we will have to go,” Mohammed, who goes by one name like many Afghans, said. His only request to the Pakistan government? “Leave us here.”

———
Rebecca Santana can be reached at Rebecca Santana (ruskygal) on Twitter
———
Associated Press writer Zarar Khan in Islamabad contributed to this report.

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

abay kar bhi do “repatriate”… kab se suntay aa rahay hayn “Pak to repatriate Afgh refugees” :smack:

Re: Pakistan to repatriate 3m Afghan refugees

jee send kerdein abb, or plz kuch khyal Pakistani Bangladeshis ka bhi ker lein, instead of hosting Afghans for almost 2 decades, they should have allowed stranded Pakistanis who are living as stateless people in camps.