Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

Quite a misleading heading and story. What generals have to do with his ouster? Wasn’t Bajwa his handpicked general? Wasn’t JIT and SC heard his case for the last more then one year and gave him plenty of opportunities to prove himself innocent then gave a decision?

Pakistan?s Generals Strike Again: Sharif?s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

The ouster of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif heightens instability in a nuclear-armed country plagued by terrorism.

BRUCE RIEDEL

07.31.17 1:00 AM ET

The most dangerous country in the world just got even more unstable.

The recent demise of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is a victory for the country’s generals who despise Sharif for being “soft” on India and seeking peace in Afghanistan. His brother Shahbaz will replace Nawaz but faces a country in turmoil and must first win a by-election to parliament to take on the job.
Make no mistake: Instability in Pakistan is dangerous for the United States and for the world. Pakistan has the fastest growing nuclear weapons program in the world, along with intermediate-range ballistic missiles, American supplied F16 jets, and is developing tactical nuclear weapons.

In Pakistan’s 70-year history, no prime minister has ever served a full term in office; all 18 attempts have left short of time. Sharif has been prime minister three times over the last three decades and has been removed from office each time. His administration this time had the distinction of being the first elected government ever to replace a previously elected government by the ballot box.

The Supreme Court ousted Sharif due to a corruption scandal that emerged more than a year ago, when the so-called Panama Papers were leaked. Investigators found that Sharif’s family had sizable amounts of money and assets in London, including four luxury flats that allegedly had been purchased with illegal proceeds. A Joint Investigation Tribunal dominated by the army concluded that the family had assets far beyond their income and recommended the case to Pakistan’s Supreme Court.

A key part of Sharif’s defense rested on the testimony of the former Qatari prime minister, Hamid bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani (HBJ). HBJ was a business partner of Sharif and has provided written evidence to corroborate Sharif’s claims about how he legitimately acquired the London properties. But the tribunal rejected the Qatari’s letters.

In the end the Supreme Court convicted Sharif on a technicality: He had failed to report to parliament a work permit he had obtained while in exile that facilitated travel to the United Arab Emirates. The court referred all the other charges against the prime minister and his daughter and two sons for further judicial review. So the case will drag out for months.

Nawaz reportedly wants his younger brother Shahbaz to fill out his five year term before elections next year. Shahbaz has been governor of Punjab province, the nation’s most populous, and is a competent and successful executive. The family dominates the ruling party, the Pakistan Muslim League (PML), and has a strong majority in parliament. It’s two largest rivals led by Imran Khan and Bilawal Bhutto can not block the PML’s choice. But Shahbaz must first win election to the parliament which will take a month or more. In the interim a former oil minister, Shahid Khasan Abbasi, will be the temporary prime minister.

I first met Shahbaz when he came to Washington in 1999 to warn the Clinton White House that then Chief of Army Staff General Pervez Musharraf was planning a coup to oust his brother. We listened sympathetically but couldn’t stop a coup in a nuclear weapons state. After the coup took place the brothers lived in exile in Saudi Arabia for almost a decade. The army wanted them never to return, but Musharraf was driven out of power by a popular movement.

The army is the most powerful institution in Pakistan and has a long history of removing prime ministers that its leadership dislikes. Sharif has been in the army’s crosshairs since he accepted President Bill Clinton’s call for a unilateral cease fire during the 1999 Kargil war with India. When Sharif pulled back Pakistani troops in the ceasefire, he set the stage for the coup that ousted him months later, which Shahbaz predicted. He was able to return only after the 2007 collapse of General Musharraf’s dictatorship. From exile Musharraf now has hailed the supreme court decision as “historic.”

Nawaz Sharif’s fitful attempts to improve Pakistan’s troubled relations with India since the 1990s lie at the core of the army’s dislike for him. Nawaz and Shahbaz are more interested in economic growth than pursuing Pakistan’s vendetta with India. Nawaz has also sought to persuade the Afghan Taliban to negotiate with the government in Kabul, a stance that the army opposes as well. Sharif has kept Pakistan out of the Saudi war in Yemen for over two years, producing serious strains in Pakistan’s ties to Riyadh, and more recently he has been neutral in the Qatari dispute with the kingdom.

The military is also among the most corrupt institutions in the country. Officer pensions are very generous. Musharraf lives in Dubai with an extensive portfolio. The army is the nation’s biggest property developer with large holdings in the cities, including 35 square kilometers of sea front in Karachi. Several large trusts are run by the army, with billions in assets.

In addition to the threat it poses as an unstable nuclear power, Pakistan is a patron—and victim—of terrorism.
It is home to numerous terrorist organizations, including Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, the Haqqani network, al Qaeda’s emir Ayman al-Zawahiri as well as Osama bin Laden’s son, Hamza bin Laden. It has been the target of dozens of terrorist attacks by the Pakistani Taliban. Some 55,000 Pakistanis have been casualties of terrorism in the last decade.

The border with India is tense after a series of violent incidents. The two have fought four wars. There are no direct air flights between Islamabad and New Delhi.
Pakistan is also China’s closest ally, and Sharif is responsible for negotiating an enormous $50 billion development deal with Beijing.

The Trump administration is still reviewing U.S. policy toward Pakistan. Since 2001 the U.S. has provided over $30 billion in aid to Pakistan, but the Congress has become much more reluctant to approve military assistance since Osama bin Laden was killed in a safe house just outside the Pakistani equivalent of West Point in Abbottabad in 2011.

The president avoided a bilateral meeting with Nawaz Sharif when they both were in Saudi Arabia in May, which has been interpreted in Islamabad as a signal of cooling ties.

The corruption scandal is outside of Washington’s influence, but how it plays out will have significant consequences for South Asia and beyond. Opening a high-level dialogue with the new prime minister would be a prudent step. Washington should avoid the temptation to deal directly with the generals, that is a path to failure.

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

was Ayoub, Zia and Mushy were hand picked!!! answer to this answer it all

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

It is Bruce Reidel.

It could’ve easily been Christine Fair.

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

score level. dawn leaks vs panama

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

^^^
Well this is why 93000 went to jails because the losers in GHQ like to get even with un armed elected governments. When ever its time to do something on real battlefield, 93000 will go to jails, Pasha will be playing Tambola while Abbottabad raid is happening, Siachen will be lost, Ariforce/Navy will not know about kargil and humiliation will happen and entire 1st armored core well be destroyed by Inidan light infantry in 1965 in battle of usal uttar calling battle ground Patton Nagar in remembering Pak army’s patton tanks graveyard.

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

What do you want to say? PML(N) paid gora journalist?? :slight_smile:

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

So you believe SC and JIT gave biased decision not based on facts?? I wonder had a different judgement come in favor of NS you would have distributed mithai like the first partial judgement came when three judges formed JIT. :slight_smile: However the buck is not stopped here. The torture will continue when 4 references against NS and co will be tried in NAB supervised by SC judge.

By the way dollar went up to more than Rs. 107 in open market. Thanks to Ishaq Dollar. :frowning:

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

I agree with you 100% on this. The red para of my post exactly says what you are saying. You have to prove involvement of generals in this case. e.g I can understand when dictators Zia-ul-Haq and Mush were ruling, they had 100% control over SC. In this case it was your government headed by your PM and president.

When JIT was formed people of IB and ISI were nominated by the SC. Wasn’t duty of your party and leaders to object the formation of such committee instead of distributing mithai?

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

Ishaq Dollar is no longer Finance minister and i hope he do this favor to the nation and remains out of the govt!!!

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

No. but bruce and christine have axe to grind. Pakistan is the new laos and cambodia for all the failures of America in Afghanistna; christine even mentioned once that she lost a friend in Afghanistan hence her vitriol against Pakistan.

There is plenty to fix in Pakistan but military is not to blame for everything there. Why don’t the at least try to make FIA and IB competent so ISI and MI is not included in investigations? Pakistan was done in when Iskandar Mirza proclaimed Marshal Law and ayub like an opportunist took over instead of jailing and prosecuting that mir jaafri.

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

58
ٹوبی
کو ختم کیا توایک اور طریقہ کار سامنے آگیا، رضا ربانی

[RIGHT]رضا ربانی کی مسائل کے حل کیلئے ریاستی اداروں کو مذاکرات کی دعوت
ملکی مسائل کا قابل قبول حل نکالنے کے لی ایگزیکٹو، پارلیمنٹ اور عدلیہ کے درمیان مذاکرات ضروری ہیں، چیئرمین سینیٹ[/RIGHT]
https://external.fkhi7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQAbYTt1wIQpQNyD&w=476&h=249&url=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dawn.com%2Fmedium%2F2017%2F08%2F5981d1e4b86d5.jpg&cfs=1&upscale=1&sx=0&sy=0&sw=500&sh=262&_nc_hash=AQBpephpf9DDJeYCInter-institution dialogue vital for crisis resolution in state: Rabbani
Raising security force to guard Chinese working on CPEC ironic as people of country remain unsafe: Rabbani.

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

That is a direct interference in civilian government. You know that ISI is more powerful than sitting PM and Chief Justice of Pakistan under current circumstances. PML(N) made a huge blunder when they distributed mithai on formation of JIT. They should have objected strongly to CJ instead of eating mitahi. Now it is too late to complain by PML(N) for which they are 100% responsible for this fup.

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

https://www.dawn.com/news/1349491/asma-jahangir-lashes-out-at-the-powers-that-be

Although Asma’s point has some merit, I will take her views with a pinch of salt. She never speaks out against politicians’ corruption. Everyone knows that she is pro-PPP. She never talks about Zardari’s corruption. never speaks out against atrocities in India-held Kashmir. some even say she’s backed by RAW. All her ire is usually directed against the military.

Indeed there needs to be accountability across the board.

However elected lawmakers should rightly be expected to uphold highest standards and be held accountable first because public repose their trust in them by giving them their vote. All the rest (not saying they should be let off the hook) including the military and the judiciary are nominated individuals and not directly elected by the people

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

She said why only politicians are made responsible why not the generals? She said SC has never punished for their crimes. She is right in her arguments.

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

In a country like Pakistan, if the representatives themselves are corrupt then how will they take on anyone else? Judiciary didn’t take suo moto corruption notices but prosecuted cases that were filed by individuals. It is the job of parliament to keep army accountable if they functioned like a true govt.

I don’t really like to give example of Erdogan anymore but in his early days, he successfully pushed back against the turkish military by being clean and improving turkish economy with its linkages in the middle east; i don’t know what the current situation is but in the past, turkish food and non-food products would be found in saudia (during hajj) and all over the middle east.

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

And I agree with OP

Let’s give the judiciary and Imran (for without him there would have been no Panama investigation. Our courts are not proactive) credit for a change. As far as I can tell, the military had no role in NS’s ouster this time around. The current COAS is as apolitical as one can be. Nawaz paid the ultimate price for his misdeeds, by accumulating massive unexplained wealth overseas way beyond his known sources of income via money laundering spread over two decades.

NS apologists should read the following and open their eyes.

The writer even argues that a corrupt leader’s focus is more on infrastructure programmes than say health and education because they stand to make money (via commissions and kickbacks) from such mega projects

https://www.dawn.com/news/1349535/another-brick-in-the-wall

OVER the past few weeks, I have come across two powerful new words. Coincidentally, both are related in a certain way. The first, ‘kakistocracy’ refers to “government by the worst people”. (Understandably, PML-N sympathisers want to insert an ‘h’ after the first ‘k’). The second word, ‘tenderpreneurs’ hasn’t made it to the dictionary as yet, but it should. It has been coined by Raila Odinga, the veteran Kenyan opposition leader, to refer to the alleged money being made by the Kenyan president and his coterie via commissions from a raft of public works tenders by the government in the run-up to elections. Many of these are deemed to be overpriced and shoddy in construction (a $12 million bridge constructed by the Chinese collapsed a fortnight after inauguration by the president earlier this year).

Misuse of public funds, embezzlement, using a public office for private gain, stashing ill-gotten wealth in offshore tax havens etc., have all been around since people first stepped forward to ‘serve’ others and exercise control of collective finances. The scale and scope is, unfortunately, much larger now, with allegations of mega corruption no longer the preserve of African dictators like Mobutu Sese Seko, Sani Abacha et al., or of presidents Marcos, Duvalier and Suharto.

Of recent, grand corruption scandals have broken out under democratically elected governments in Malaysia, Turkey, South Africa, Spain, France, Italy, Brazil, Russia, Argentina, South Korea among others. Of course, corruption is not the exclusive domain of civilians — far from it. Many of the corrupt African dictators were serving generals (Sani Abacha, Charles Taylor etc). In Pakistan’s case, the first major corruption scandal in Benazir Bhutto’s tenure involved the serving naval chief at the time (in the Agosta submarine case). Under Gen Musharraf’s time, several high-profile cases of irregularities came to light — in the importation of rail engines and carriages, the NICL land scam, Bank of Punjab, purchase of land for the Royal Palm Golf Club etc. — with none being properly prosecuted.

Much of the corruption and looting of a country’s wealth comes from the plunder of its natural resources. For countries that are not resource-rich, a major avenue is the public investment programme — the building of motorways, mass transit programmes and other large infrastructure projects. This is well documented in economic literature. A 1997 IMF Working Paper co-authored by Vito Tanzi (a global authority on public finances) concludes that: “[sic] corruption lowers growth. The evidence shows that corruption increases public investment while reducing its productivity. An implication is that economists should be more restrained in their praise of high public-sector investment, especially in countries with high corruption.”It’s a sad reflection on us when we lionise corrupt leaders.

Considerable work has been done in the last decade on the costs of large-scale corruption. One of the more comprehensive ones is a 2006 study by the World Economic Forum, which found that **even a “slight (one standard deviation) improvement in governance results in a threefold increase in income per capita in the long run.” That variation can spell the difference between poverty and prosperity for a nation.
**
So when a ‘Third World’ leader facing allegations of mega corruption gets ensnared by the country’s top court for failing to account for millions of dollars of unexplained — and largely undeclared — wealth amassed over a period coinciding with his tenure in public office, shouldn’t the citizens of that poor country be celebrating? While large numbers of Pakistanis are jubilant, a sliver of its elite — from amongst the country’s top human rights lawyers, TV anchors, commentators and columnists — are mourning the victory for accountability and rule of law.

Driven by a visceral bias against the military, or by virtue of being connected insiders to the patronage dished out by governments — and in a few cases, having a genuine untainted viewpoint — these members of the elite have based their non-stop bemoaning of the Supreme Court verdict purportedly on three counts: one, why was the Sharif family ‘targeted’ while other corrupt public figures have not faced the courts; two, this was an army-engineered ‘conspiracy’; and three, the actual verdict is based on a technicality.
Deconstructing these arguments finds them on flimsy foundations. Application of law is directed towards those who have been caught. With more than ample evidence coming to light of a web of complex global transfer of funds and transactions spread over two decades, including purchase of expensive offshore properties, and no explanation for the sources of income or a legitimate money trail, the court ruling was inescapable.

The military conspiracy argument ignores the elephant in the room — the presence of unexplained and undeclared assets whose ownership the ruling family accepted in court. While the military is likely to have watched this episode unfold gleefully, the Sharifs have been caught out by their massive unexplained agg*****sement of assets coinciding with their long stint in public office. As for the technicality, one wonders if we would bemoan Al Capone’s conviction because he was nabbed on tax evasion and not for his real crimes — murder, extortion, racketeering etc.

Pakistan has traversed a fair distance in terms of entrenchment of the rule of law since the lawyers movement of 2007. While there have been setbacks, the July 28 ruling by the Supreme Court is a huge step forward. We need to build on this by strengthening judicial processes and ensuring accountability and enforcement of rule of law in a transparent and non-discriminatory manner for all segments of society. This cause is not helped, however, by exhibiting intellectual dishonesty and not being able to call out a wrong that has been so evidently committed. The elite needs to develop loyalty to higher principles, not a self-serving one to individuals in power.

“The worst thing is that we live in a contaminated moral environment. We feel morally ill because we became used to saying something different from what we thought.” — Vaclav Havel.
The writer is a former economic adviser to government, and currently heads a macroeconomic consultancy based in Islamabad.

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

money is pumped into Kashmir in a process known as SKIMMING.This allows about 25% of the money to disappear into foreign bank accounts of generals and politicians…This is why they are all billionaires.

nobody in pakistan give a iota about Kashmir except for the gullible.

skirmishes are instigated deliberately on both sides to keep the conflict alive to allow the money laundering…

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

Why and how they blame generals, when its the same corrupt people again in the so-called new cabinet?? Why is a thug who causes daily looting of money on LNG terminal made a PM ??
Why is NS and his clan not in jail for their crimes ?? Why is Hudaibiya Mills case not being proceeded ?? What the hell did happen with NS just removed but still enjoying protocol and all that $hit ??
WTF is NAB, FIA etc doing?

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

Imran Khan’s response to Asma

Re: Pakistan’s Generals Strike Again: Sharif’s Ouster Is a Scary Shake-Up

This seems to be a soap opera. This woman was quiet for four years and suddenly she has brought the case of sexual harassment by IK in public media. Even it is true, I am not going to buy her story because the timing coincides with NS’s disqualification. PML(N) is doing every effort to disqualify IK but it looks it will backfire.