Pakistan retain #3 spot despite defeat.

Entertainment Cricket and Other Sports
1

ICC One-Day International Championship Table
as at 18 December 2002 ]



  Team                Matches        Points              Rating 
1 Australia            29                3756                130 
2 South Africa       48                6028                126 
3 Pakistan            42                 4771               114 
4 Sri Lanka           41                4593                112 
5 India                 38                3929                103  
6 West Indies        31                3073                 99 
7 England             24                 2335                 97 
8 New Zealand      31                 2832                91 
9 Zimbabwe          35                 2321                66 
10 Kenya              14                 286                 20 
11 Bangladesh      15                  146                 10
2

:yawn: :more yawn:

3

As I thought :hehe:

4

Just goes to show how bad the teams below Pakistan are.

5

Well said! :rotfl: :rotfl:

Pakistan has mainly lost its matches against highly ranked teams, like SAF, and Aus.

According to the points system of this table, losing to higher rank teams isn’s as bad as losing to lower rank.

For example

India losing to Pakistan will loose less rating pts than when India looses to Kenya.

6

:hehe:

our nearest neighbour is SL just 2 points away but they are not winning too and after that there are no chances that India can catch SL and PAK there is a difference of around 10 points

7

Means Pakistan will loose more rating if they were beaten by India :hehe:

8

True that!
Which will never happen! :smiley:
Its not that Pakistan is a better team but India chickens out everytime!

9

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by UMAIR316: *

Pakistan has mainly lost its matches against highly ranked teams, like SAF, and Aus.

[/QUOTE]

Help me with my memory here... Which country did Bangladesh defeat in the last World Cup... I dont seem to remember the name... I do remember the captain of that losing team saying that they did not mind losing to brothers... must admire the man for his audacity...

FOR ALL GUPPIES :

THE CORRECT SPELLING OF "LOOSING" AS IN "PAKISTAN LOOSING TO INDIA" IS "LOSING".

Being a long time "khel khelari" watcher , I can confidently say that 90% of the Guppies do not know this or may be they are just LOOSE when it comes to English Grammar.

10

Oh I’m sorry how can I forget the famous loss. :rolleyes:

Here is what I said

Now I don’t know if you read my statement properly but thats what I said, most of the matches Pakistan has lost is against South Africa and Australia in the past 3 years, I hope you can understand that. :slight_smile:

11

Question to Uncle SOME1

what will India do if suddenly there is no Dravid in batting to rescue ???

Anand Vasu - 15 April 2002

Seven ones are seven
Seven twos are fourteen
Seven threes are twenty-one
Seven fours are twenty-eight
Seven fives are thirty-five…
Boring as hell. No one who ever went through middle school thought multiplication tables were fun. Ok, geometry could be inventive, trigonometry fascinating and calculus puzzling. But multiplication by rote? If math was Indian cricket, Rahul Dravid would be those very same multiplication tables. Boring? Yes. Tedious? Yes. Unglamorous? Yes. Yet, without knowing them, you wouldn't have a chance of getting ahead. And forgive me for stating the obvious, without Dravid, India wouldn't have a chance of getting ahead while playing abroad.

Dravid is no Tendulkar. He can't delight Indian fans and enchant cricket lovers with a spanking innings of 79. Yet his true value comes to the fore only when Tendulkar falls. While the little man is at the crease, the runs flow, the bowlers are battered into submission, the field tired and weary. His dismissal, however, makes sure that the very same bowlers perk up, fielders cheer and chirp audibly, and the pressure is on the batsmen.

And then, from an extreme corner of the stage, from where he was staking his claim for best supporting actor, emerges Dravid. It is his responsibility to see India through to safety.

Test cricket is hard enough for batsmen seeking to make big runs. Ask the Prince, Brian Lara, who was adjudged caught behind for a duck on a wicket where he might have had 200 on a different day, or with a different umpire. Ask Sourav Ganguly who made five before a short delivery on a flat track cost him everything.

Better still, ask Dravid. He knows how hard it is, what it takes, and makes sure the job is done. No, for all his hard-fought innings of character abroad, he won't attract one extra television commercial or one more fan. He will remain, however, a shining example of why it's important to learn the fundamental things well.
seven sixes are forty-two
seven sevens are forty-nine…

After all, without the basics how far could you possibly go?

Never mind mate but these are the facts ....

CONVICTIONS are a greater threat to the TRUTH than LIES

12

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *
FOR ALL GUPPIES :

THE CORRECT SPELLING OF "LOOSING" AS IN "PAKISTAN LOOSING TO INDIA" IS "LOSING".

Being a long time "khel khelari" watcher , I can confidently say that 90% of the Guppies do not know this or may be they are just LOOSE when it comes to English Grammar.
[/QUOTE]

Please spare Some1 as he suffers from "lose" motion...or was it "loose" motion...I am lost!...

13

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *

FOR ALL GUPPIES :

THE CORRECT SPELLING OF "LOOSING" AS IN "PAKISTAN LOOSING TO INDIA" IS "LOSING".

Being a long time "khel khelari" watcher , I can confidently say that 90% of the Guppies do not know this or may be they are just LOOSE when it comes to English Grammar.
[/QUOTE]

Now you being all proper about grammar, then tell you what, the comma in watcher should be right after the word not a after a space. LOSER.
Did I spell it right?