Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets

*Nation Sells $2 Billion of Debt, Almost Two-Thirds to U.S.-Based Money Managers
*

By ANJANI TRIVEDI

April 9, 2014 7:19 a.m. ET

Pakistan returned to the international bond markets Wednesday after a seven-year hiatus, joining a number of other countries around the world raising cash as yield-hungry investors look to put money to work.
Pakistan sold $2 billion of debt, with almost two-thirds going to U.S.-based money managers, two days after Sri Lanka sold a bond for a second time this year. Bankers say Papua New Guinea, Bangladesh and Bhutan are also expected to come to the market this year, hoping to lock in low yields.

The demand reflects both improving economies in these countries and investors’ appetite to venture further afield for high returns. The appeal of emerging-market debt has risen as central banks in U.S., Europe and Japan pledge to maintain stimulus measures to keep growth humming, a move that pushes up asset prices across the globe.

“There’s been a reversal in the sentiment towards emerging markets over the last two weeks. Everyone loved to hate them, and now, all of sudden everyone is increasing their positions,” said Rajeev DeMello, head of Asia fixed income at SchrodersSDR.LN +0.69% Investment Management in Singapore, which has $435.4 billion of assets under management.

Mr. DeMello’s fund holds Pakistani bonds and said his funds are interested in buying more, and Sri Lankan bonds.
In March emerging markets saw $39 billion in portfolio inflows from global investors—$24 billion of which was into bond markets—up from $25 billion in February and $5 billion in January, the Institute of International Finance estimated.

Pakistan racked up orders worth $7 billion while Sri Lanka drew over eight times the $500 million on offer with orders of $4.3 billion, with a significant uptick of Asian investors’ participation compared with its $1 billion January issuance. The finance ministries of Papua New Guinea, Bangladesh and Bhutan weren’t immediately available for comment.

Devesh Ashra, head of Asia debt syndicate at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said the most important reason these countries are issuing bonds is the expectation that global interest rates are going to rise. The Federal Reserve has started slowing the pace of economic stimulus, meaning it is likely that yields are set to rise as the U.S. economy improves.

“U.S. investors are looking for incremental yield and issuers are ready to lock in rates knowing that we are going to be in a higher-rate environment in one year’s time,” he said.
The debt is sold in dollars, another lure for investors given strong prospects for the greenback in the long run on signs of a slow but renewed recovery.

But even outside the U.S. dollar, there is demand for emerging markets that had been shunned last year. Turkey said Tuesday it would issue a euro-denominated bond and Greece says it will return to the market with an approximately €2 billion ($2.75 billion) debt sale, for the first time after being bailed out.

“Investors are losing patience with the very low yields” in U.S. Treasurys, said Schroders’ Mr. DeMello. Investors are also beginning to realize that they “will be stuck with very low yields for a long time,” so they are paying attention to these higher-yielding markets once again, he said.

Still, some investors are steering clear of these bonds, and say that these countries haven’t done enough to improve their finances and economies yet.
Low returns in the U.S. mean there is “a lot of money being sloshed around,” said Robert Abad, an emerging-markets portfolio manager at Legg Mason’s Western Asset Management in Pasadena, Calif. ,with $451.6 billion under management. While this money will find a home, he said, “it’s all opportunistic. It’s not clear how these proceeds are going to be used.”

Mr. Abad isn’t buying any of these new bonds, while he does hold higher-rated bonds of Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand.

While many other long-term investors remain convinced there is high-growth potential of these emerging markets, several are treading carefully and in some places demanding extra compensation for holding risky assets.

While investors welcomed junk-rated Pakistan’s 10-year bonds, the country had to pay investors a hefty premium for the deal. The yield was at 8.250%, compared with 6.875% it paid to issue a similar-duration bond in 2007 and that is currently trading at 6.338%.

It was a similar story on Tuesday with Zambia, which issued a $1 billion bond, its second-ever dollar bond. The African nation had to pay higher borrowing costs for the deal.

Anjani Trivedi at [EMAIL=“[email protected]”][email protected]

Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets - WSJ.com

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Pakistan hopes to raise $2bn in bond issue - DAWN.COM

Not sure about bonds but they sure did raised 23 dead bodies in Islamabad.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Ghalib was great
ہم سے کھل جاؤ بوقتِ مے پرستی ایک دن
ورنہ ہم چھیڑیں گے رکھ کر عُذرِ مستی ایک دن
غرّۂِ اوجِ بِنائے عالمِ امکاں نہ ہو
اِس بلندی کے نصیبوں میں ہے پستی ایک دن
*قرض کی پیتے تھے مے لیکن سمجھتے تھے کہ ہاں
رنگ لائے گی ہماری فاقہ مستی ایک دن
*
نغمہ ہائے غم کو ہی اے دل غنیمت جانیے
بے صدا ہو جائے گا یہ سازِ زندگی ایک دن
دَھول دَھپّا اُس سراپا ناز کا شیوہ نہیں
ہم ہی کر بیٹھے تھے غالب پیش دستی ایک دن

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

I think, if they decided to invest 2 billion $ in Pakistan then the Pak could gain huge benefit.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Pakistan borrowed (sold bonds) at interest rate of around 8 percent, and that means, Pakistan would pay ~ $160 million each year as interest on those $2 billion bonds.

Actual bond cost:
$1 billion 5 years bond at interest rate of 7.25 percent.
$1 billion 10 years bond at interest rate of 8.25 percent.

[It is possible that interest rate would be higher, as occasionally bonds are not sold at par, rather below par ... and I do not know what price government got for the coupon].

Note: Pakistan is also getting billions of dollar aid from IMF at interest rate of 1 percent.

I think it would have been much better if government only raised around $500 million from bond, not for money but for raising credit worthiness. Certainly 10 years bond carrying interest rate of 8.25 percent was not needed ... but government mouth waters looking at dollars coming to country that they can steal what later generation would pay.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Recently (26 March 2014), Pakistan (Nawaz) government has issued rupee bonds (increased Pakistan debt through issue of bonds) from local market (internal debt) of around Rs 540 billion (or ~$5.5 billion) at average interest rate of ~12.5 percent.

Source: http://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/Auction-Investment.pdf

Above borrowing is on top of billions of rupees Nawaz government borrowed in recent past.

And now they also borrowed $2 billion issuing bonds … this amount is on top of what Pakistan borrowed from IMF and other sources, plus $1.5 billion ‘bheek’ Pakistan received from KSA.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

In 2007 Pakistan went to world market and issued bond. It was not to fulfil any need, but to make Pakistani presence in world market and increase rating. At that time Pakistan paid 3.25 percent more than US treasury rate for its 10 years bond. Even though bonds were hugely oversubscribed. What I remember, government accepted only $500 million even though offer came in the region of ~$10 billion.

Today, due to Pakistan junk economic condition, Pakistan is paying 5.58 percent above US treasury rate for 5 years bond and 5.56 percent above US treasury rate for 10 years bond, still it is surprising that government accepted $2 billion … when offer came was for $5.2 billion.

Single attempt: Pakistan raises $2b through Euro bonds – The Express Tribune



The $1 billion has been raised for five-year at a fixed rate of 7.25%, which is 5.58 % over and above the benchmark five-year US Treasury rate. The rest of the $1 billion was generated through 10-year bonds at a fixed rate of 8.25%, which is 5.56% above the corresponding 10-year US Treasury benchmark rate.

In 2007, the General Musharraf government had issued 10-year bonds at a 6.75% interest rate, which was 3.25% above the US treasury rates at that time.

As against the high premium that Islamabad chose to pay, Sri Lanka on Tuesday sold $500 million five-year bonds at a 5.1%. Pakistan has a junk credit rating of Caa1 by Moody’s Investors Service, which increased the cost of borrowings.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

It is really funny that interest rate for borrowing has gone down all over the world, but for Pakistan, it has gone up. ... Still, government is bent on borrowing more and more, so that rulers can steal.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Qarzon pay tau pala haiy yeah banda.

Election campaign mein bhi qarza qarza karta tha. This was expected.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

^^^ Nice observation. :) ...

On the other hand, qarza for Ganja looks 'fazlay-Rabbi' when Ganja borrows and Kangla Pakistan pays.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

I am no financial wizard. Nor am I great on stock and bonds but I believe (correct me if i am wrong) but this is a 10 year Euro Bond from Pakistan issued in 2007.

Cbonds. International bonds: Pakistan, 2017 (USY8793YAM40)

The coupon rate which I believe is the interest rate is 6.875%

SO NS has gone only 1.5% over what Musharraf issues. In 7 years that is not bad.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

The interest is expensive given the state our economy and security situation and the government's unchecked borrowing spree.

India is going to issue bonds 2.5% above US treasury rates.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Yes and India is the 5th largest economy in the world. As always I am confused if anybody here took any freaking economy classes during their schooling.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

After reading your post, I can affirm that you are not financial wizard for sure, neither you are great on stock and bonds. :slight_smile:

Anyhow, one can also say from your post that you do have some knowledge on the issue. Thus, I would try to explain the significance of Pakistani bond issued in 2007 and today.

First let me explain you interest rate, as sometime borrowing a currency at 10 percent could be good borrowing and at other time borrowing same currency at 5 percent could be bad borrowing.

Interest rate depends on currency one is borrowing as well as market condition. When one borrows, one looks at currency one is borrowing and running interest rate in that currency. For instance, in 1980, borrowing ‘UK pound sterling’ at 15 percent would have been fine but today borrowing ‘UK pound sterling’ at 3 percent would be paying too much interest.

Most Pakistani debt, Pakistan reserves, and Pakistan trading currency is dollars. Pakistan pays interest in dollars, and pay for goods in dollars. That is the reason, Pakistan mostly borrow dollars. If Pakistan borrows any other currency or keep reserve in any other currency, then Pakistan would be considered as taking currency risk, that most country avoid (risk on currency movements).

At any time, dollar market interest rate for borrowers is current interest rate what USA treasury pays to borrow. So, interest rate of borrowing in dollars is evaluated with reference to USA treasury current interest rate.

In 2007, when Pakistan borrowed at 6.875 percent (10 years bond) … USA treasury interest rate was 3.625 percent (10 years bond) … and that is the reason it is said that in 2007, Pakistan paid 3.25 percentage points above US treasury interest rate.

Today Pakistan borrowed at 8.25 percent (10 years bond) … and USA treasury interest rate today is ~2.7 percent (10 years bond) … and that is the reason it is said that Pakistan is paying 5.56 percentage points above US treasury interest rate.

That means, US treasury interest rate has come down by almost full percentage point since 2007, but Pakistan borrowed 2.3 percentage points more expensive than borrowing in 2007. If Pakistan had borrowed at same interest terms what they did in 2007, than interest on their borrowing would have been around 5.95 percentage point … instead of 8.25 percentage point.

Now significance of 2.3 percentage point extra payment on $2 billion borrowing:

Pakistan borrowed $2 billion. If all loan was for 10 years than Pakistan would be paying $165 million a year (@8.25 percent) instead of $119 million (@5.95 percent)… or $46 million a year extra interest. Over 10 year period that comes to approximately half a billion dollars (or ~ 50 billion rupees), and that extra interest payment is quite a lot for poor country like Pakistan.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Why?

[quote]
Most Pakistani debt, Pakistan reserves, and Pakistan trading currency is dollars. Pakistan pays interest in dollars, and pay for goods in dollars. That is the reason, Pakistan mostly borrow dollars. If Pakistan borrows any other currency or keep reserve in any other currency, then Pakistan would be considered as taking currency risk, that most country avoid (risk on currency movements).
[/quote]

Actually that is not the reason but go on.

[quote]
At any time, dollar market interest rate for borrowers is current interest rate what USA treasury pays to borrow. So, interest rate of borrowing in dollars is evaluated with reference to USA treasury current interest rate.

In 2007, when Pakistan borrowed at 6.875 percent (10 years bond) … USA treasury interest rate was 3.625 percent (10 years bond) … and that is the reason it is said that in 2007, Pakistan paid 3.25 percentage points above US treasury interest rate.

Today Pakistan borrowed at 8.25 percent (10 years bond) … and USA treasury interest rate today is ~2.7 percent (10 years bond) … and that is the reason it is said that Pakistan is paying 5.56 percentage points above US treasury interest rate.

That means, US treasury interest rate has come down by almost full percentage point since 2007, but Pakistan borrowed 2.3 percentage points more expensive than borrowing in 2007. If Pakistan had borrowed at same interest terms what they did in 2007, than interest on their borrowing would have been around 5.95 percentage point … instead of 8.25 percentage point.

Now significance of 2.3 percentage point extra payment on $2 billion borrowing:
[/quote]

Why does it matter what the US treasury rate is at?

[quote]
Pakistan borrowed $2 billion. If all loan was for 10 years than Pakistan would be paying $165 million a year (@8.25 percent) instead of $119 million (@5.95 percent)… or $46 million a year extra interest. Over 10 year period that comes to approximately half a billion dollars (or ~ 50 billion rupees), and that extra interest payment is quite a lot for poor country like Pakistan.
[/QUOTE]

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Because it is used as benchmark world over. :smack:

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

Thank you. Now some one explain to me why the a Caa1 bond is being equated to a AAA bond?

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

which one are you calling AAA bond?

If you are talking about US government treasury bonds, then as I said, government bond prices are normally quoted as basis points above US treasury rates for comparison purposes.

Re: Pakistan Re-Enters Global Bond Markets : WSJ

And again I am asking why are comparing the two? Here is the simple thing. The Pakistani economy is no where as robust as the US economy or as stable. So why would you assume they would get the same interest rate as the US T-bill?

Its like comparing a rickshaw to a Ferrari and saying oh look my Rickshaw is not as fast.

The entire bone of contention is that the interest rates are high. Well no **** sherlock they are high. We have Caa1 rating. You don't need to be a financial expert to see that.