He specifically said ‘I will end corruption in Pakistan in 90 days’. He cannot change that to ‘top order of govt’ - yet another u turn by Imran.
And even if we judge him by that , who makes his ‘top order of govt’ - Sheikh Rashid, SMQ, Jahangir Tareen - some of the most corrupt people we have seen.
According to Corruption Index in 2013, Pakistan was in same position of 127, it is same in 2014, what is the improvement? This index was same as Zardari’s government. However Pakistan is still considered to be one of the most corrupt country, what is this excitement about?
LOL @Iconoclast Im not supporter of any political party of Pakistan. So I dont enchant any silly slogans for or against any specific 'person' but like only some positive ones (Non-shirk ones) for Pakistan no matter which party they come from. And Im just stating facts as I know/have heard. And how the top order is defined, really I was also wondering about the same.
He specifically said 'I will end corruption in Pakistan in 90 days'. He cannot change that to 'top order of govt' - yet another u turn by Imran.
And even if we judge him by that , who makes his 'top order of govt' - Sheikh Rashid, SMQ, Jahangir Tareen - some of the most corrupt people we have seen.
@TheRealDeal, I think he meant the top order of the government of KP. I am not sure the above names you mentioned are the part of KP's top order government? I think the names you mentioned are representing PTI in different cities of Pakistan not in KP? Can you clarify that? Because I myself dont know who forms the top order of KP government (Except for the CP Pervaiz Khattak). I heard that KP government is in coalition with Jamiat Islami? But since Imran Khan took that challenge so yes, we must scrutinize the top order of KP government to know if he has fulfilled his promise.
South K is ranked 46th while North is 175. The lower the ranking, the higher corrupt country is. I'm most impressed with Bhutan reighning over 31st rank above many developed countries.
The picture selected by author is wrong, when he is talking about 2014 then he should’ve selected right graph, the graph/picture clearly says “2013” also see the bolded text from the article: