Pakistan Protesters fail to live up to Ideals: Financial Times

***Har Soo Hmare Khoon ke Cheente Gire Tau Kya !

Yh Tau Hua Ke Shehr ko Raa’ni mil Gye !***

Pakistan protesters fail to live up to ideals

By Victor Mallet in Islamabad

Demonstrations aim to topple elected government

[RIGHT]
[/RIGHT]

Rehman Ali, a 27-year-old factory worker from Lahore, has declared himself ready for death in the fight against corruption and poverty.

**“I’ve told my wife that if I die here as a martyr, she should make arrangements for my funeral,” **he said last week as thousands of Pakistanis like him prepared to march on parliament and the prime minister’s residence in the capital, Islamabad. He was protected only by pink swimming goggles and a mask over his mouth to keep out the tear gas.

When the assault was finally launched at the weekend by protesters wielding wooden clubs and wire-cutters, at least three people were indeed killed and hundreds injured in the police counter-attack. The stand-off continues, with almost every word and deed broadcast to some 200m Pakistanis on 24-hour television news channels.

But the deeper reasons for Mr Ali’s presence at the barricades, and the motivations of those who led him there for three weeks of street protests aimed at toppling the elected government of Nawaz Sharif, remain an enigma.

**The two protest leaders, who have also offered to martyr themselves in a hail of government bullets, claim to be championing democracy in one of the world’s largest Islamic nations. But their actions and their speeches suggest the opposite.
**

Imran Khan, the former cricket star turned politician, has likened the demonstrations in Islamabad to the Tahrir Square uprising that toppled authoritarian Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak three years ago.

Mr Khan complains that Mr Sharif rigged the election that brought him to power last year but he has not adequately explained why it took him 15 months to reach this pitch of outrage.

Others believe the event is more notable for being the first transfer of power between one democratically elected government and another in the history of coup-prone Pakistan.

**Nor has Mr Khan reminded his supporters that in Egypt, Tahrir Square ushered in a controversial Islamist government followed by brutal suppression and a new military takeover.

Political rivals dismiss his protest as an act of desperation after his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (Pakistan Justice Movement) came third in the general election and he failed in his ambition to become prime minister.**

Tahirul Qadri, the fiery Islamic preacher and self-styled revolutionary who has provided most of the frontline demonstrators in Islamabad (Mr Khan’s generally middle-class supporters arrive in the evening to hear his speeches interspersed with disco music), is harder to explain.

Mr Qadri is based in Canada, not Pakistan, and returns periodically to intervene in politics. In early 2013, just a few months before the election, he led a similar march on Islamabad that failed to overthrow the previous government of Asif Ali Zardari.

**Many Pakistani analysts and politicians say it is the army that deploys Mr Qadri and quietly supports his protests when it wants to oust or destabilise a civilian administration.
**

**The army’s generals certainly distrust Mr Sharif,

****who has sought to make peace with India, delayed army operations against Taliban militants along the Afghan border and is pursuing a treason case against Pervez Musharraf, the former army chief who overthrow him in a military coup d’état in 1999.
**

Mr Sharif himself, however, cannot escape blame for the current crisis. He is regarded as aloof, monarchical and dynastic (his brother Shahbaz is chief minister of the populous Punjab province) and has disappointed supporters who expected him to use his third term as prime minister to revive the struggling economy and tackle Islamist terrorism.

“He didn’t seem to have fire in his belly this time,” says Mushahid Hussain Sayed, a senator who chairs the upper house’s defence committee. “He seems to be bored with the job of prime minister.”

Some critics go further. They call him weak and cowardly, complaining that he has scarcely attended parliament and say he is rattled by the rise of opponents in the previously secure Sharif fiefdom of Punjab (both Mr Qadri and Mr Khan come, like him, from Lahore).

Pakistan, to paraphrase the apocalyptic lines of W.B. Yeats, is torn between politicians full of passionate intensity and those who lack all conviction. The protests have not yet turned to anarchy. But even if Mr Sharif survives this crisis, his government – and Pakistani democracy – will probably be enfeebled.

Re: Pakistan Protesters fail to live up to Ideals: Financial Times

**Daily Mail

THE LAHORE LOG: Sharif must fight Imran for the sake of democracy**

By MEHR F. HUSAIN
PUBLISHED: 00:51 GMT, 5 September 2014 | UPDATED: 00:51 GMT, 5 September 2014
[RIGHT]
[/RIGHT]](http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2744226/THE-LAHORE-LOG-Sharif-fight-Imran-sake-democracy.html#comments)
**

In 2007, people chanted “Go Musharraf Go!” Today they chant “Go Nawaz Go!”

How things change. But generally, there has been little realisation of the difference between expressing contention according to the situation, i.e differentiating between whether the head of state is aggressively claiming sovereignty like Musharraf, or he/she is the result of a rotting system due to lack of political evolution, as in PM Sharif’s case.

Hence, Khan and Qadri’s demand for electoral reform is actually undemocratic as it involves removing the head of state and looking to the military to resolve the situation.

+2

Under threat: There is unanimous agreement that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif must ensure that he is seen to be a more effective leader if he is to avoid being ousted from power

These three flawed players can either destroy what has been achieved politically, or ensure that from this point on, much-needed harsh lessons are taught and will not be forgotten.

But until some form of breakthrough in this deadlock takes place, heads will roll, blood will be shed, and the weak democracy that is just about flickering amid the winds of change will be put out once again.

And it will be for nothing but sheer arrogance, unwillingness, and inability to accept on the part of three men.

Qadri, an unelected cleric, calls for political reforms which involve the removal of the current leader, to be replaced by handpicked, clean technocrats.

The sole aim of Khan, an elected official, is to get the head of state to resign.

Both are apparently part of an anti-government, undemocratic agenda and rely on the military to provide relief from a supposedly illegitimate Government.

Meanwhile, the civilian Government headed by PM Sharif resorts to state violence to contain the protestors while also relying on the military to provide relief from Khan and Qadri.

Turning to the military completely undermines parliamentary democracy. The military, which hasn’t forgotten the anti-Musharraf chants, strategically replied to all three with a ‘sort out the political mess yourself without state violence’.

This can be regarded as a warning and means they are waiting to see if the political forces can work out a solution via dialogue.

Or it can be seen as a means to an end, whereby people who are also crying out for military intervention experience the ugliness of democracy, and thus no criticism against the military can be voiced.

Or it could be that they are waiting for the situation to explode in mass violence, thereby justifying intervention politically.

Whatever it is, the current scenario is this – Qadri has the manpower, Khan has the legitimate protest, the military who can make or break anyone are waiting, and the PM is in trouble for refusing to respect and acknowledge valid concerns.

However, what the Government does have and must respect is Parliament’s support.

Despite the PM rarely making an appearance, Parliament has sided with the PML N and there is unanimous agreement that there are legitimate concerns about the elections that must be addressed, and that to avoid being ousted the Prime Minister must govern better.

His previous two stints were interrupted and for a third time in power, he must now realise what to do and how to do it. Yet there has been no sign of either.

For Khan, who leads a party that has consistently existed on a reactionary basis, there is bound to be limited success due to lack of a progressive stand.

After eighteen years, one reason for his party gaining seats in 2013 is that the PTI was viewed as the alternative to the PPP.

Khan cannot ignore the fine line between the electorate choosing you for your mandate or a means to punish the incumbent.

He needs to examine the current outpouring of supporters and his assumption of electoral victory in the next election.

An angry party leader who has formed his current persona on being competition for PM Sharif, does not amount to being the leader of a nation.

+2
Dissent: Supporters of PTI leader Imran Khan listen to his speech during an anti-Government protest near the Prime Minister’s residence in Islamabad. Khan must understand that his support does not amount to a mandate to take power himself

Removal of the PM is in no way going to ensure that PTI will win the next election. Nor does it promise that a Government run by technocrats will ensure Pakistan will become the utopia envisioned by Qadri. Nor will it fix an already flawed democratic system.

Yes, the weak system with its creaky machinery is frustrating, but democracy has consistently been interrupted, halting political growth.

Consequently, it is disheartening to see how eleven years of Zia-ul-Haq were tolerated, while there are calls not to tolerate PM Sharif for only four more years when it is imperative he stays for the country’s sake.

The writer is a columnist based in Lahore

Read more: THE LAHORE LOG: Sharif must fight Imran for the sake of democracy | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter](http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=MailOnline) | DailyMail on Facebook**

Re: Pakistan Protesters fail to live up to Ideals: Financial Times


What "ideals"?

Re: Pakistan Protesters fail to live up to Ideals: Financial Times

N wht is the po8nt of discussion :konfused:

Re: Pakistan Protesters fail to live up to Ideals: Financial Times

yaaraa Desert Bird, stop copy N paste posts. why don't you just discuss the issues? why do you just vut N paste?

Re: Pakistan Protesters fail to live up to Ideals: Financial Times

The two protest leaders, who have also offered to martyr themselves in a hail of government bullets, claim to be championing democracy in one of the world’s largest Islamic nations. But their actions and their speeches suggest the opposite.

Re: Pakistan Protesters fail to live up to Ideals: Financial Times

Have you all forgotten that during the last election, the major opposition parties, PPP, ANP and MQM were all under terrorist threat by the TTP. The ANP in particualar, had to curtail electioneering in KP…
Militants threaten ANP activists to shut poll offices in Peshawar - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

How then can the PTI’s victory be considered legitimate, if the competition isnt allowed to compete? As a former sportsmen, IK should understand the injustice off that. Yet why does he suddenly not remember the threats against the opposition?!?! Selective memory?