Pakistan plotted India's downfall to perfection

Pakistan plotted India’s downfall to perfection

Ashish Shukla (Press Trust of India)
Colombo, July 26

Pakistan’s victory over India was a result of a meticulous planning which focused on containing the famed Indian batting line-up through innovative field placements and “controlled aggression”.

Pakistan coach Bob Woolmer said his team had perfectly implemented the strategy drawn up for the crucial Asia Cup match against India on Sunday.

“Inzamam was perfect with his planning against Sachin. We wanted to keep him off the strike and succeeded to the extent he scored only 40 runs from the first 27 overs,” said Woolmer as he looked back at that successful outing which Pakistan won by 59 runs.

Time and again, Tendulkar was bowled on his pads and two men were kept in the deep behind square leg, resulting in only a single and the strike being transferred to the non-striker.

Woolmer also had his plans against Indian captain Sourav Ganguly, aimed at capitalising on his perceived weakness to short-pitched deliveries.

"Shoaib Akhtar came round the wicket to Ganguly and aimed short-pitched deliveries at his chest with a short square leg, short mid-on and short midwicket-fielder in place.

“We saw what happened to him against Nuwan Zoysa in the league game in Dambulla. He pulled a catch straight to mid-on. When I was with South Africa, we had this plan against him where we tried to pick him on the onside. I could have perhaps helped him if he was one of our boys. But he has to sort it out himself,” said the coach.

One of the strategies Woolmer planned and Pakistan adopted in Sunday’s game was the sharp throw which fielders sent in to the wicketkeeper even when the Indian batsmen were not attempting singles.

“It was under a plan of controlled aggression. If you use it regularly you get used to doing it and when a real opportunity comes along, you are ready for it,” Woolmer said.

Analysing Shoaib Akhtar’s performance, he said the fiery speedster could prefer to bowl all his overs in One-Day Internationals from a short run-up in the days to come.

“He was far more consistent when he bowled his final two overs from a short run-up. We discussed this matter after the game and it could come to a stage when he might prefer to bowl all his overs from a short run-up in future. But it would be strictly Shoaib’s call.”

Pakistan batsmen also swept the Indian bowlers a lot but Woolmer said he would have been happy if they had attempted a few reverse sweeps as well.

“Reverse sweeps could have got some handy runs because that area on the off-side was unprotected for most part of the innings,” said Woolmer.

Woolmer, a strong advocate for improved on-field communication between a coach and his team, said from the next tournament onwards, he would send the 12th man into the middle with a walkie-talkie in hand.

“A coach must be allowed to communicate. Suppose if I want a fielder to stand 10 metres inside the ropes or a field placement altered, I should be able to communicate with the team. As of now, ICC has banned wired exchanges between a captain and a coach. So we would try the 12th man with a walkie-talkie from the next tournament onwards.”

http://www.htcricket.com/htcricket/7266_909234,001600760004.htm

Pretty pathetic...

I’m no fence-sitter, India will run away with the game

Kris Srikkanth
July 24

Sri Lanka are on a roll, aren't they? How often do you see 10-wicket victories in one-day cricket?

But play as well as they might, the one thing the Lankans will have to concede is that the most eagerly awaited match in the Asia Cup is the one on Sunday — the first India-Pakistan clash of a brand new season.

Diplomacy is not something that comes naturally to me and neither do I like to sit on the fence. So I am going to stick my neck out and say that my gut feeling is that the Indians will run away with the match or at least not have too much difficulty in beating their arch-rivals.

The feelings are not without reason.

Pakistan are struggling with their batting, while India seem to have got their act sorted out. Even in the match against Lanka, the manner in which the batsmen came back to all but pull off a win, is what gives me heart. On the other hand, the way the Pakistanis capitulated against the hosts, was not funny.

The Pakistan team's strength lies in their fast bowling — at least on paper. Shoaib Akhtar, Mohd Sami and the tall Shabbir can be a dangerous but that's where the depth in the Indian batting order comes in.

Unlike Pakistan's over-dependence on Inzamam, the Indians have their talents well spread out. If Sachin and Sehwag don't take off, there's always Ganguly and Dravid, not to forget Laxman and Yuvraj.

I think it is important for the Indians to let Sehwag carry on with his natural game. If he provides a typical start that lasts even 5-6 overs, his job will be done. It will be up to the others then.

Where the Indians will have a problem is with their team composition.

Normally in Lanka, more so at the Premadasa Stadium, the ball keeps low and slow but in this tournament I have noticed that the wicket has at times helped the quicker bowlers. Nevertheless, based on the fact that at least two games have now been played on the same ground, I would go in for both Kumble and Harbhajan along with Irfan and Nehra.

Please let us not take a chance with Zaheer, who seems fit one day, unfit the other and fit again!

Zaheer is a key bowler for India but he should be allowed time to get fully fit and not rushed. In any case, I don't see him going flat out if he plays.

Of course, it is not the easiest of choices to make and I will respect the judgement of the tour selectors should they decide to stick to three fast bowlers and one spinner. They know the present conditions best. (XSports Bangalore)

Raabutt, iss article ki batti banaa ker srikaanth ko daido. :hehe:

^ us batti ko woh kahan roshan kare ga phir? :Pretty:

How does Woolmer communicate with his players? does he have a translator? Does he understand urdu and communicate in urdu?

As far as I have heard and seen on TV. They do communicate in English and I think they have a translator as well. But, I'm not sure.

Harron Rasheed is team translator.

^ Thanks! Makes more sense now :) I knew after listening to Inzi and Malik that they must have really hard time communicating w/ the coach.

^ errr... and why is he disclosing specifics about his tactics??!!

First of all, there is no obvious benefit of disclosing such specific strategies in public, except to suggest "I am so good, I figured it all out". I suspect Miandad, before he went away, Woolmer kay sarr pe haath pher giya hai... and thats whats given Woolmer the big mouth. Shut up, already!

The comment about Ganguly is hilarious, though ("I could have perhaps helped him if he was one of our boys. But he has to sort it out himself").

About the last part, it suggests as if Inzi is a goofball who needs to be spoonfed by the coach every now and then. Abay agar hai bhi tau sab ko batanay ki kiya zaroorat hai? The role of captain in cricket is much different from many other sports and this nitty gritty of decision-making on the ground separates a good cricket captain from a poor one. If the coach wants to send walkie talkie communications to Inzi, that doesn't say much about his abilities. The coach and captain should practice with the players and come up with strategies before the match. On the field, captain should be... well, captain. Is that too much to ask?

ps. Re: Srikkath, less said the better. Though he is not the only one. People of all teams boast about theirs before the match. They make for amusing reading after the matches, though.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *
... Inzi is a goofball ...
[/QUOTE]

You got that right! :D

In hindsight it is easy to criticize Srikanth. But I suspect most of us would have agreed with him before the match.

Also it is writers job to write whatever he/she feels about the situation. There is nothing wrong with expressing one's opinion as long as one is not disrespectful or uses cheap words for others.and I dont see any thing objectionable in that article. He simply said that pakistani batting is struggling and Indian arein better shape and India would win.isnt what many of even pakistani supporter though before the match. What would you expect him to say after whole team is out on 122.
So just chill and dont react be on high horses Pakistan won a match.This article is no more different than Arjun Ranatunga saying that Indians are in bad shape and Srilanks should win today's match.Would not that be true. If tomorrow India wins I can say that Arjuna got it wrong but It will be stupid of me to say 'Re:Arjuna , less said the better" or "Pretty pathetic..."

Pak coach

Pak coach discloses his tactics against the two best Indian batsman Tendu and Ganguly.... amazing what can I say.

If it were Miadad he would have never done that. If anyone remembers he even stopped Wasim Akram from coaching Indians on how to play reverse swing. Miadad is far better than Woolmer.

if ne 1 thinks inzi is a dumb idiot…umm…who promoted malik to no.3 so that he cud make 143?? inzi…woolmer is jus sayin that there shud be a walkie talki cuz the coach has a better insite inot wat is goin on in the match, and so wud be able to get a better result…lol especailly wid woolmers analysis of the situation…

and ya…the whole world knows gangulys week against the short ball…

and the thing bout tendulkar…even if he dus reveel it…wats gna hapen…tendu cant do nethin against it…cuz its the way he plays…infact itll jus help reduce tendus effectivness as a bat…cuz other teams will use same tactics…and ya…he never disclosed the plans he had against kaif, yuvraj, sehwag or dravid (who is the best batsman in india…not tendu)

woolmer mite even take us in to the finals of the champs trofy in engalnd :smiley: :jhanda:

Inzi is a stupid idiot.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by fair_&_balance: *
In hindsight it is easy to criticize Srikanth. But I suspect most of us ....
[/QUOTE]

Agree 100%. Before the India-Pak match, the Pakis here did not themselves have any faith in their team after the 122 performance. One guy said that Pak will be a$$-whipped by India....
moral of the story : its easy to be wise after the event...