Pakistan on the brink

Pakistan on the brink
Benazir Bhutto
July 24, 2007 12:00 AM

Pakistan is facing a deep crisis, a crisis that began almost fifty years ago when President Ayub Khan the country’s first military ruler seized power in 1958. Thirty years ago, in 1977, another military coup d’etat against a democratically elected government further deepened the crisis. Four military dictatorships, most recently General Zia-ul-Haq and General Pervez Musharraf, have ruled my nation for the last 32 years alternating with elected civilian governments that have been summarily brought down by intervention by the military intelligence agencies. Democracy has never been given a chance to grow in Pakistan. Today the crisis has not only continued but it has dangerously accelerated, not only in Pakistan but for the region and the wider world community and much to the dismay of the people of Pakistan, Islamabad has become the site of a training and staging area for Al-Qaeda.

Tragically from our soil, from areas that were under the control of my government but have now been ceded to the militants, pro-Taliban forces linked to al-Qaeda launch almost daily attacks on NATO troops across the border in Afghanistan. They also pose an internal threat to the 160 million people of Pakistan killing members of the armed forces, political workers, and innocent civilians across the length and breadth of Pakistan. Last week we had four suicide attacks and in the last suicide attack that took place in Islamabad 18 people were killed. From parts of the Pakistani territory that the present regime has termed ungovernable those forces of militancy and extremism are planning further acts of terror and aggression against the West and against the people of Pakistan threatening to match or even exceed the scale of the September 11th atrocities. Without hesitation I believe that the future of democracy in South Asia and, without exaggeration, the stability of the entire world lies in the balance directly as a result of the international community’s acquiescence to military dictatorship.

In the view of my party military dictatorship fuels the forces of extremism by putting into place a government that is unaccountable, unrepresentative, undemocratic and unable to fulfil the aspirations of the great and hardworking people of Pakistan. Military dictatorship born from the power of the gun undermines the concept of the rule of law and gives birth to a culture of weapons, violence and intolerance. The suppression of democracy in my homeland has had profound institutional consequences; the major infrastructural building blocs of democracy have been weakened, political parties have been marginalised, NGOs dismantled, judges sacked and civil society undermined. The Red Mosque incident which we saw earlier this month is the direct result of an eight year military regime’s policy of the so called Islamisation of my nation. Just as the military establishment of the 80s used the so called Islamic card to promote military dictatorship while demonising political parties so too has the military dictatorship of the 21st century used the so called Islamic card to pressure the international community into backing military dictatorship in Pakistan. We in the PPP agree that the militants of the Red Mosque had to be stopped from taking over Islamabad and imposing their own brand of politics which they wrongly tried to justify in the name of Islam. But we believe that this incident should have been dealt with six months back when burka-clad people took over a government owned library.

It is sometimes argued in the West traumatised by terrorism that a military regime is the only thing that stands in the way of a nuclear armed fundamentalist Pakistan. Nothing can be further from the truth. The militant dictatorship needs the external crutch of a militant threat to justify its existence to the international community. Whether in the East or whether in the West dictatorship fuels extremism rather than contains it. The Red Mosque siege has shown us how dangerous parts of Pakistan have become since democracy was derailed in the country in 1996, when Pakistan was one of the ten emerging markets of the world. If the military regime and its civilian allies are allowed to rig the upcoming election scheduled for later this year I am in no doubt that it will give the Taliban sympathisers five more years to spread their tentacles across the nooks and corners of our country and if that is the case then we really could be facing an Islamist takeover of Pakistan in five years time. The choice in Pakistan is not really between military and the mullahs, the choice in Pakistan is between dictatorship and democracy, and it’s not just the choice in Pakistan in my view, humbly, I say that is the choice the world too faces with us.

Yet to understand the present and to change the future we must understand how we came to this point. Shortly after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 international calls for a Pakistani return to democracy subsided. The West saw an opportunity to use the events in Afghanistan to hobble the Soviet Union. The Western policy at that time was directed to only one goal; to use Afghanistan as the final nail in the coffin of the Soviet Union. Short-term advantages checkmated long term policy goals as the West funnelled aid and training of the extremist mujahideen through Pakistan’s intelligence services which were then commanded by a military dictator with close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. He turned to the Muslim Brotherhood within Pakistan and to the Muslim Brotherhood outside Pakistan to put together the Afghan mujahideen. The mujahideen would later morph into the Taliban and the Taliban would morph, in turn, into al-Qaeda and the rest is ugly, painful history. But it was not necessarily unpredicted. A short-term policy decision has generated a long-term crisis not just for South Asia but for the entire world. Decisions made in the early 1980s can be directly linked to the terrorist attacks of 9/11, to the attacks on Madrid, London, Glasgow, Peshawar, Islamabad and Quetta and to the continuing plots emanating out of al-Qaeda and the Taliban from the safe haven that they have established in the tribal areas of Pakistan against my people and against yours.

Comment, opinion and discussion from the Guardian US | The Guardian](http://www.iiss.org/)

Re: Pakistan on the brink

This was another absolutely rubbish article posted by a megamaniac, power hungry and corrupt ex-PM of Pakistan.

Let's talk about BB's role in helping the Taliban, the Babar conduit?

Lets talk about her usurption of democracy and the extrajudicial killings of her political enemies and allegedly her brother?

I bet there are many PPP/BB supporters lurking about. Have you ever met Benazir or Asif? How about the the "esteemed" present Pak. Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi? If not, I really hope that you see them in their element. A few choice words for Pakistani people.

Re: Pakistan on the brink

FATA was never under her control, there was just little to argue about then. her govt let FATA go about their business, and FATA let her govt go along with her business. Actually FATA was happy with her, rather Her pal babar who at her orders engineered the whole taleban deal to begin with.

Many people felt that her regime while it got into office by votes (real or fake, rigged or clean is a diff debate) but once it got into power, it did little for the people.

as far as extremism goes. it was the 90's when we saw the rise of sectarian violence in Pakistan, somethign she did little to control.

the major infrastructrual building blocs of democracy are unfortunately hollow, mold infested, and not sound.

so Nawaz govt was not democratic then? kewl by that token Musharraf did not over throw a democratically elected leader :) well thats a refreshing bit of news.

It was her govt that helped mujahideen morph into al qaeda
and taleban were not al qaeda, and still are nto al qaeda, taleban as brutal as they were had no real plans to go global, alqaeda just found like minded ppl and a safe haven.
Now the interests of al qaeda and taleban are aligned in many areas, just like the interests of al qaeda are aligned with the sectarian and ethnic nationalists in Iraq.

Re: Pakistan on the brink

I am surprised she did not mention again that the court case against her in swiss courts was an attempt by swiss authorities to divert attention from some nazi gold controversy :D

Re: Pakistan on the brink

all she wants to say is she comes and all shall be well :p

Re: Pakistan on the brink

Pakone, While you have no problem bringing up mistakes of the past you continue to support bad policy of the present. Where do you think appeasement towards the tribal areas will lead Pakistan?

Re: Pakistan on the brink

Waaao, it seems like she is willing to do whatever it takes, say whatever it takes.....to try to bring to International community's notice that how bad a place, how bad a system Pak is and how is she the only one person who make changes over night!

Re: Pakistan on the brink

There is nothing to base a forward facing view , there is no noted change in the forward direction out. what does she intend to do differently.

what you are sayign about pakone i.e. bringing up mistakes of the past, that is what banazir's article is about as well, although intellectually dishonest because she fails to admit her part or of her failure to do anything about it while she was in office.

what is going to be her policy change. Its easy to do monday morning quarterbacking. But where is the suggestion on what needs to be differently at this point in time.

as far as appeasment of tribals, it will lead Pakistan in the same direction that it has led NATO led afghanistan due to makign deals with the warlords there.

so benazir....give us a plan. give me a 90 day plan of what you will do. I will make it easy as hell, dont even give me stuff on health and infrastructure, and education and tax and what nots.

give me a 90 day plan of what you will do in dealing with the militants, how, when, where, etc etc. milestones, established goals.

come on...harvard and oxford must have taught you that much.

Re: Pakistan on the brink

BB , Not again , a big no from me side

Re: Pakistan on the brink

Benazir was pretty hot in her youth, sexy and chic, educated...she should have been an actress, a Hollywood leading lady, and not a politician, cos her record in that field stinks.

Re: Pakistan on the brink

what she is trying to convey is that Pakistan is not a good place to have all those billions of dollars in reserve, she is the best person to hold/utilize all that money in the interest of the nation/region.

Re: Pakistan on the brink

she might have got a role of mother of villain

Re: Pakistan on the brink

I have no problem bringing up the past because BB is calling for the return to the 'glorious' democracy, presumably under her leadership. If she will criticize anyone, then her hypocrisy must be exposed.

You still did not answer my questions about BB. Oh just for fun let's add:

  • What was BB's role in the Khalistan matter? Direct contacts with Rajiv Ghandi?

  • What was her position on the Kashmir issue? Particularly in the UK and Indian publications?

You should read my other post the tribal areas. Just a simple question: Are they Pakistanis or not? You answer that question and will restate my position.

Re: Pakistan on the brink

pakistan is not helped by the prevailing conditions. what pakistan needs is time and a settled world especially in the region. as we all know this time isnt available so some amount of being and staying on the brink is to be expected for the following few years atleast.
military government is not a problem initself, neither is a civilian administration. the problems facing the government will remain the same. corruption, mismanagement and the world famous militancy will effect all governments for the forthcoming years.
by looking at international media it seems like the directional politics of the different players is what wins votes, as most of you know this isnt true in reality. pak politics is an infastructure affair, the collective biradary votes and political offices are what gains votes. ppp has the best infastructure

thats why any leader in pak can always expect massive organised friction to his/her rule

Re: Pakistan on the brink

I do not wish to intrude in your debate with underthedome, but if what you insinuate from your questions is correct, one is constrained to ask: Why was Benazir or PPP not charged for the said crimes when the military came into power itself (Khalistan and Kashmir Policy has always been run by the military) or by her arch nemesis, Nawaz Sharif?

Re: Pakistan on the brink

No problem. In regards to the Khalistan comment, the 1990 BB dismissal by G.I.Khan under a litany of charges including anti-state activities. NS was not a player at that time. If you have access to the GoP archives, you can verify the specifics.

As for the comments on Kashmir, the military govt did want to table treason charges against BB until politic of power got in the way. Just look up a particular rediff interview.

Both NS and the military have played the game of politics. For NS, he has more than enough dirty dealings in his past (including his OWN treason charges) that he has enough reason to fear a PPP backlash. The military, while having the power, faces two issues: 1. Monkeyboy generals who are in support of PPP 2. President Musharraf's desire to hang on to power by possibly co-opting the "liberal-secularist" bloc controlled by PP.

Not to divert the topic but NS should have been executed for treason not allowed to leave country under that pansy agreement. Now are you going ask me why the military allowed that to happen as well?

Re: Pakistan on the brink

1: If the military brass has not charged the PPP for such a serious crime only because of political reasons, then it is just as guilty of the crime.

2: If NS should have been hanged for treason, the same rule must also apply to PPP. Why is the application of law so selective?

3: Musharraf hated PPP and BB until recently so the question of not going after PPP because he wanted to co-opt secular liberals does not arise. He did, after all, pursue all corruption cases against BB and her husband for a long time.

Re: Pakistan on the brink

1: If the military brass has not charged the PPP for such a serious crime only because of political reasons, then it is just as guilty of the crime.

I am not sure if you're aware the laws of Pakistan, International law or even the basic concepts of logic, however placing the military brass in the same category as the traitor is called "guilty by association." Please read up on that concept.

Has the military not performed its duties by fully prosecuting BB? the answer is yes.

**
2: If NS should have been hanged for treason, the same rule must also apply to PPP. Why is the application of law so selective?
**

Not sure about what you are referring to here. NS both in his words and practice has committed treason and should be punished as well. Are you calling for PPP to punished for treason as well? I don't think that EVERYone in PPP is responsible just BB.

**
3: Musharraf hated PPP and BB until recently so the question of not going after PPP because he wanted to co-opt secular liberals does not arise. He did, after all, pursue all corruption cases against BB and her husband for a long time.**

Musharraf has been more than occupied with more crucial matters of the state after he took over power. He pursued the cases against BB because they were already on the books. Like I said, he let NS go, something that I disagree with.

If we execute NS or BB? Do you know the sort of turmoil Pakistan would be thrown in?

Let me put it this way, both ex PMs have these brainwashed provincial blocs which would rise up against anyone who actually applies the rule of law for their crimes. Perhaps you fall into that category. That person's government (whether democratic or military) would be thrown in turmoil and possibly overthrown.

I don't have a background that has placed me near NS. However for BB, I can tell you that any and all Pakistanis supporting her are misguided to say the least.

Re: Pakistan on the brink

I am an ordinary joe not versed with any of those spiffy concepts u mentioned. But I have a question. If we r going to be applying the "guilty by association" concept here, then should Musharraf also be declared a traitor or would-be traitor for trying to make a deal with BB?

I gather u want him to executed for treason. My point is, BB (and by association, all of PPP?), committed treason too by giving out the Sikh lists. Why should she not be executed as well? Y this selective application of law?

ok :)

So a large disparity between what we can do and what we should do. hmm

Re: Pakistan on the brink

Much the same as appeasing the US by going in to places all guns blazing

Pakistans power elite is divided into two groups those whom there is a selective application of law on one group (politicians like BB, NS, PML-Q) and the second group consists of those above the law. The latter consists of people whose personal corruption of power or money is a non issue and often lecture the people on who is good or bad.