Re: Pakistan no 12 on Failed state index
SAARC a bunch of ‘Failed States’ : Indian magazine
http://www.kashmirwatch.com/showheadlines.php?subaction=showfull&id=1182316380&archive=&start_from=&ucat=1&var0news=value0news
By Ramesh Ramachandran
New Delhi, June 19: Six of the eight member states of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc) figure in the top 60 countries ranked in order of their vulnerability to violent internal conflict and societal deterioration, according to the 2007 Failed States Index published by the Foreign Policy magazine.
Afghanistan tops the list, followed by Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bhutan, in that order. Pakistan and Afghanistan occupied the top two slots in the last Failed States Index too. India, which has most of these countries and Burma in her neighbourhood, has improved her position from 93 in 2006 to 110 this year.
The report says Pakistan, which presides over a lawless frontier country and a disenchanted Islamist opposition whose ranks grow by the day, is among the world’s 15 most vulnerable countries to become a member of the nuclear club. Pakistan also fares poorly on the “security apparatus” and “factionalised elites” indicators.
The authors of the report say that the indicator score for security apparatus remains high because the shadowy Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency continues to operate as a state within a state. They go on to observe that the questionable element is the ISI, which is believed to operate with near complete impunity.
According to Prof. Kalim Bahadur, formerly of the Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi, Pakistan helped the Taliban to reconstitute in Waziristan. “Stabilise Pakistan to stabilise Afghanistan,” he asserts, but hastens to add that as long as General Pervez Musharraf occupies power, stability cannot be restored in Afghanistan.
The report echoes Prof. Bahadur’s views. It suggests that fighting by a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan and in the lawless North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan has the potential to spread instability across the region. “In some of the world’s most dangerous regions, failure doesn’t stop at the border’s edge. It’s contagious. [It] is no coincidence that many of the world’s failing states tend to cluster together. Porous borders, cultural affinity, and widespread underdevelopment often bind populations. And when some live in a failing state, their woes can quickly spill over into a neighbour’s backyard,” the report adds.
For the second year in a row, Sudan tops the rankings as the state most at risk of failure. Norway remains the least vulnerable state. China and Russia improved their scores sufficiently to move out of the 60 worst states.
The Failed States Index was first introduced in 2005. It has expanded from 75 countries in 2005 and 146 countries in 2006 to 177 this year. The 2007 Failed States Index ranks the 177 countries based on their social, economic, and political pressures.